UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant                              Filed by a Party other than the Registrant 

Check the appropriate box:

 Preliminary Proxy Statement

 Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))

 Definitive Proxy Statement

 Definitive Additional Materials

 Soliciting Material under Rule14a-12

NETFLIX, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)

 No fee required.
 Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.
  1 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  2 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  3 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule0-11 (set
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined):

 

  4 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

  5 

Total fee paid:

 

 Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 1 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 2 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 3 

Filing Party:

 

 4 

Date Filed:

 

 

 

 


LOGOLOGO

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF


LOGO

Letter from Our Lead

Independent Director

LOGO

Jay Hoag

FELLOW STOCKHOLDERS,

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 6, 2018We hope you and your families are healthy and safe. The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented challenges and 2020 was a year marked with extraordinary loss for many. Throughout the year, we were fortunate to be able to adapt our business operations to protect the well-being of our employees and partners while also ensuring business continuity. We are grateful that we have been able to provide our members with a source of escape, connection and comfort during these challenging times.

  This past year also brought issues of racial and social injustice to the forefront. As a global company with a broad member base, we believe that talented employees with diverse backgrounds, cultures, perspectives, and experiences unlock and drive innovation, creativity, and the variety of our storytelling. We believe that more diversity in our company leads to more diversity behind the camera and more diversity on screen, and we published our first Inclusion Report in January 2021, providing a snapshot of representation within the company, and how we plan to increase it and cultivate a community of belonging. We followed that with a groundbreaking study, from the USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative, examining diversity in our US original series and films, which we shared publicly to benchmark our progress and hold ourselves accountable for our goals of ongoing improvement.

We are humbled by our talented and dedicated teams who continued to create and deliver world class entertainment during these extraordinary times. Our original stories deeply resonated with audiences and were nominated for 160 Emmys and an industry-leading 36 Academy Award nominations within the last year.

In 2020, we had approximately 204 million paid memberships, achieved approximately $25 billion in revenue, representing 24% year-over-year growth, and approximately $4.6 billion of operating income, representing 76% year-over-year growth, as well as improved our cash flows from operations. We prioritize creating long-term value for our stockholders, demonstrated by our strong total stockholder return. As of December 31, 2020, we delivered 67% in annualized total stockholder return over the prior one-year period and 40% since our initial public offering in 2002 through December 31, 2020.

We believe we are in the early stages of the transition to streaming entertainment all around the world. To support continued growth, we evolved the management team with the appointment of Ted Sarandos as Co-Chief Executive Officer, in addition to his role as Chief Content Officer, and Greg Peters as Chief Operating Officer, in addition to his role as Chief Product Officer. Ted was also appointed to the Board. Reed Hastings continues to serve as Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Ted is instrumental to the innovation and success of Netflix, particularly in driving the content strategy. Both Co-Chief Executive Officers collaborate closely on corporate strategy and are involved in all aspects of management. Greg oversees global operations and our team responsible for product, ensuring that Netflix stays aligned, productive and able to improve rapidly. We believe this is an effective leadership model and mostly formalized the prior working relationship between Reed and Ted.

The Board, alongside management, continued to actively engage with stockholders to seek their input and provide perspective on our policies and practices. This year, the discussions were focused on environmental, social and governance matters; diversity, equity and inclusion; and our executive compensation program.

On behalf of the Board, we thank you for your investment and wish you and your families good health.

Warm regards,

LOGO

Jay C. Hoag

Lead Independent Director

LOGO


Notice of Annual Meeting

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 3, 2021

To the Stockholders of Netflix, Inc.:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Netflix, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held on June 6, 20183, 2021 at 3:00 p.m. Pacific Time. You can attend the Annual Meeting via the internet and vote your shares electronically and submit your questions during the Annual Meeting, by visiting nflx.onlineshareholdermeeting.comwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFLX2021 (there is no physical location for the Annual Meeting). You will need to have your16-Digit Control Number included on your Notice or your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials) to join the Annual Meeting.

The Annual Meeting will be held for the following purposes:

 

1.

To elect four Class I directors to hold office until the 20212024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;

2.

To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018;2021;

3.

Advisory approval of the Company’s named executive officer compensation;

4.

To consider sixthree stockholder proposals, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and

5.

To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.

These business items are described more fully in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice. Only stockholders who owned our common stock at the close of business on April 9, 20188, 2021 can vote at this meeting or any adjournments that may take place.

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting via the internet.

For ten days prior to the meeting,Annual Meeting, a complete list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the meeting. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, please email board@netflix.com to make arrangements to examine the stockholder list. The stockholder list will also be available during the annual meeting during ordinary business hours at the address of the Company’s executive offices noted above.by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFLX2021 and entering your 16-Digit Control Number.

By order of the Board of Directors

 

LOGOLOGO

David Hyman

General CounselChief Legal Officer and Secretary

April 23, 20182021

Los Gatos, California

LOGO


YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE OVER THE INTERNET, WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING VIA THE INTERNET. IF YOU RECEIVED A PAPER PROXY CARD AND VOTING INSTRUCTIONS BY MAIL, PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE, WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING VIA THE INTERNET.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JUNE 6, 2018: 3, 2021: THIS PROXY STATEMENT, THE NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND THE ANNUAL REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT WWW.PROXYVOTE.COM.WWW.PROXYVOTE.COM.

LOGO


LOGOLOGO

PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JUNE 6, 2018

LOGO


LOGO

INFORMATION CONCERNING                    

SOLICITATION AND VOTING

General


GENERAL

The attached proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Netflix, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”“Company,” “Netflix,” “we,” “us” or “our”), for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 6, 2018,3, 2021, at 3:00 p.m. Pacific Time (the “Annual Meeting”), or at any adjournment or postponement of this meeting, for the purposes set forth in this Proxy Statement and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and form of proxy. This year’s annual meetingAnnual Meeting will be held entirely via the internet.internet and will be conducted by our Chief Legal Officer and Secretary. Stockholders may participate in the annual meetingAnnual Meeting by visiting the following website: nflx.onlineshareholdermeeting.com.www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFLX2021. To participate in the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, you will need the16-digit control number included on your Notice, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. We encourage you to access the Annual Meeting webcast prior to the start time. Online check-in will begin at 2:45 p.m. Pacific Time, and you should allow ample time for the check-in procedures. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual shareholder meeting log in page.

Hosting the Annual Meeting via the internet provides expanded access, reduced environmental impact and cost savings for our stockholders and the Company. Hosting a virtual meeting enables increased stockholder attendance and participation. In addition, we intend that the virtual meeting format provides stockholders a similar level of transparency to the traditional in person meeting format. As a longstanding practice for many years, our stockholders are able to submit questions four times a year as part of our quarterly earnings interview, and answers to top investors questions are available on our Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net. As such, questions at our Annual Meeting will be limited to those for our auditors, if any. Instructions on how to ask questions for our quarterly earnings interviews are found in the press release announcing the date on which we will release each quarter’s earnings results.

Pursuant to rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the internet. Accordingly, the Companywe will mail, on or about April 23, 2018,2021, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to stockholders of record and beneficial owners as of the close of business on April 9, 2018,8, 2021, referred to as the Record Date. On the date of mailing of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, all stockholders will have the ability to access all of the proxy materials athttp:https://ir.netflix.com/annuals.cfm.ir.netflix.net/financials/annual-reports-and-proxies/default.aspx. Should you request it, we will make paper copies of these proxy materials available free of charge. To request a copy, please send your request to the Company’sour Secretary at the address listed below.

Our principal executive offices are located at 100 Winchester Circle, Los Gatos, California 95032, and our telephone number is(408) 540-3700. Our internet website address iswww.netflix.com. You may find our SEC filings, including our annual reports on Form10-K, on our Investor Relations website athttp:https://ir.netflix.com/sec.cfm.ir.netflix.net/financials/sec-filings/default.aspx.

Revocability of ProxiesREVOCABILITY OF PROXIES

You may change your vote at any time prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting. If you are a stockholder of record as of the Record Date, you may change your vote by granting a new proxy bearing a later date (which automatically revokes the earlier proxy), by providing a written notice of revocation to the Company’sour Secretary at the address above prior to your shares being voted, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting via the internet. Attendance at the meetingAnnual Meeting will not cause your previously

1


granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically make that request. For shares you hold beneficially in the name of a broker, trustee or other nominee, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, trustee or nominee, or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker or nominee giving you the right to vote your shares, by attending the meetingAnnual Meeting and voting via the internet.

Voting and Solicitation

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          3


VOTING AND SOLICITATION

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the Record Date, there were 434,692,559443,402,736 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each holder of record of shares of common stock on that date will be entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting.

You may vote via the internet by going towww.proxyvote.com and following the instructions on the screen. As explained in greater detail in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, to vote your shares, you may vote via the internet by visitingwww.proxyvote.com and having available your16-digit control number(s) contained on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. If you received your proxy materials by mail, you may vote by completing the enclosed proxy card, dating and signing it and returning it in the postage-paid envelope provided.provided, or you may vote by phone by following the instructions on your proxy card. You may vote via the internet or by phone up until 8:59 PMp.m. Pacific Time on June 5, 2018.2, 2021. If you vote by mail, your proxy card must be received by June 5, 2018.2, 2021. If you are a stockholder of record on the Record Date, you can participate in the Annual Meeting online atnflx.onlineshareholdermeeting.comwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFLX2021 and vote your shares during the Annual Meeting.

Properly delivered proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the specifications made. Where no specifications are given, such proxies will be voted “FOR” all nominees, “FOR” proposals Two and Three, and “AGAINST” proposals Four through Nine.Six. It is not expected that any matters other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement will be brought before the Annual Meeting. If, however, any matter not described in this Proxy Statement is properly presented for action at the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies in the enclosed form of proxy will have authority to vote according to their own discretion.

The required quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting is the presence via the internet or by proxy of holders of a majority of the stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting as of the Record Date. Shares that are voted “FOR,” “AGAINST,” “WITHHELD”“WITHHOLD” or “ABSTAIN,” referred to as the Votes Cast, are treated as being present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against proposals Two through Nine.Six. Brokernon-votes will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business, but suchnon-votes will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of Votes Cast with respect to any proposal. Thus, a brokernon-vote will not affect the outcome of the voting on proposals One through Eight.Six. A failure to vote or a “brokernon-vote”, will have the same effect as a vote against proposal Nine. A “brokernon-vote” occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that proposal and has not received instructions with respect to that proposal from the beneficial owner.

If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee (“street name”) it is critical that you cast your vote if you want it to count in the election of directors (Proposal One of this Proxy Statement), advisory approval of executive officer compensation (Proposal Three of this Proxy Statement), or any

2


of the stockholder proposals (Proposals Four, through NineFive and Six of this Proxy Statement). Thus, if you hold your shares in “street name” and you do not instruct your bank or broker how to vote in the election of directors, no vote will be cast on your behalf on these proposals.

The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. The Companyus. We may reimburse banks and brokers and other persons representing beneficial owners for their reasonableout-of-pocket costs. The Company may use the services of itsOur officers, directors and others tomay solicit proxies, personally or by telephone, facsimile or electronic mail, without additional compensation. If you vote using the internet or by phone, you may incur data or telephone usage charges from internet access providers or phone companies. The CompanyWe will not reimburse those costs.

LOGO

4          LOGO


STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Stockholder Proposals

Proposals of stockholdersproposals that are intended to be presented at our 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in theour proxy materials for such meeting must comply with the requirements of SEC Rule14a-8 and must be received by our Secretary no later than December 24, 20182021 in order to be included in theour Proxy Statement and proxy materials relating to our 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Stockholder nominations for director that are intended to be presented at our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in our proxy materials for such meeting must comply with our bylaws and must be received by our Secretary no earlier than November 24, 2021 and no later than December 24, 2021 in order to be considered for inclusion in our Proxy Statement and proxy materials relating to our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. A stockholder proposal or a nomination for director or on any other matter that will not be included in our Proxy Statement and proxy materials, but that a stockholder intends to present via the internet at the meeting, must generally be submitted to our Secretary no earlier than February 7, 2019,2022, and no later than March 9, 2019.2022. Such proposal or nomination must also comply with the requirements set forth in our bylaws. Proposals and nominations should be mailed to: Netflix, Inc., 100 Winchester Circle, Los Gatos, California 95032, Attention: Secretary. Our bylaws have been filed with the SEC and are available at www.sec.gov.www.sec.gov.

 

3LOGO


PROPOSAL ONE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS2021 PROXY STATEMENT          5


LOGO

Netflix 2020 Year in Review

BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

In a profoundly challenging year, we were grateful to present TV series, documentaries and feature films in more than 30 languages and 190 countries that resonated so deeply with audiences and earned a record 160 Emmy nominations and 36 Academy Award nominations within the last year. In 2020, we had approximately 204 million paid memberships, and financial highlights for 2020 included achieving approximately $25 billion in annual revenue, representing 24% year-over-year growth, and approximately $4.6 billion in operating income, representing 76% year-over-year growth. Our cash provided by operating activities also improved in 2020. We prioritize creating long-term value for our stockholders demonstrated by our strong stockholder return. As of December 31, 2020, we delivered 67%, 41%, 36% and 36% in annualized total stockholder returns over the prior one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods, respectively, and 40% since our initial public offering in 2002.

EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP CHANGES

In July 2020, Ted Sarandos was appointed to the Board and promoted to the role of Co-Chief Executive Officer, in addition to his role as Chief Content Officer. Reed Hastings continues to serve as Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Mr. Sarandos has served as the Chief Content Officer since 2000, and this promotion formalized the evolution and growth of his duties and responsibilities. Messrs. Hastings and Sarandos have a long history of collaboration and will continue to work closely on corporate strategy and planning and are involved in all aspects of management.

Also in July 2020, Greg Peters was appointed as Chief Operating Officer, in addition to his role as Chief Product Officer, in which he has served since 2017. Mr. Peters has been with Netflix since 2008, holding positions of increasing responsibility, bringing strategic and analytical strength to the executive team. In his role as Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Peters oversees global operations and our team responsible for product – anything a member or non-member touches when they come to our service, ensuring that we stay aligned, productive and able to improve rapidly.

We believe the Co-Chief Executive Officer leadership structure and the addition of the Chief Operating Officer role provide an efficient and effective leadership model to support our future growth.

BOARD COMPOSITION

In 2020, we added two new members to the Board, Ted Sarandos, our Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Content Officer, who was appointed to the Board in July 2020 and Strive Masiyiwa, who was appointed to the Board in December 2020. Ambassador Susan Rice resigned from the Board effective January 20, 2021. More information on each Board member can be found in the section titled, “Proposal One: Our Board of Directors—Election of Directors—Who We Are.”

RESPONSE TO COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic and precautions to mitigate the spread of the virus significantly impacted the media and entertainment industry, including our business and operations. In an effort to protect the health and safety of our

LOGO

6          LOGO


LOGO

employees, our workforce has had, and continues in most instances, to spend a significant amount of time working from home. While we and our partners have resumed productions and related operations in most parts of the world, certain of our productions continue to experience disruption, as do the productions of our third-party content suppliers. As a result, our ability to produce content remains affected by the pandemic. The Board and management team continue to actively monitor the situation and alter our business operations as may be required by federal, state, local or foreign authorities, or that we determine are in the best interests of our employees, customers, partners and stockholders.

At the onset of the pandemic, most filming stopped globally, with the exception of a few countries. Recognizing the devastating impact on hundreds of thousands of crew and cast members, many of whom are paid hourly wages and work project-to-project, we established a $150 million hardship fund to directly support the hardest hit workers in the creative community. While most of the fund supports members of our own productions, $30 million of the fund will go to third parties and non-profits, providing emergency relief to out-of-work crew and cast across the broader TV and film industry in countries where we have a large production base.

INCLUSION AND DIVERSITY

Our company culture remains an important aspect of our operations. As we have expanded our offices globally, we have also become mindful of cultural differences across and within regions. Fostering a work environment that is culturally diverse, inclusive and equitable is a major focus for us. We employ a team reporting to our VP of Inclusion Strategy who works to build diversity, inclusion and equity into all aspects of our operations globally, with the goal of having diversity and inclusion function as a critical lens through which each Netflix employee carries out their role. We want more people and cultures to see themselves reflected on screen—so it’s important that our employees are diverse like the communities we serve. We strive to increase representation by training our recruiters on how to hire more inclusively, and to help the company and senior leaders diversify their networks.

We published in January 2021 an Inclusion Report on our website that provides a snapshot of representation within the company, how we plan to increase it, and how we cultivate a community of belonging and allyship. We have also published our U.S. Employer Equal Opportunity data (EEO-1 data) reaching back to our 2014 filing.

We also support numerous employee resource groups (ERGs), representing employees and allies from a broad array of historically underrepresented and/or marginalized communities. Our ERGs are important in creating a more inclusive environment for all employees, allowing space to connect on shared experiences, providing mentoring, career development and volunteering opportunities, and to provide the Company with insight into the perspectives, needs and lived experiences of the communities. Each ERG is supported by senior leaders across the Company.

TRANSPARENCY

We are committed to continued stockholder engagement and transparency. In response to input from our stockholders, we began publishing in 2020 an Environmental Social Governance report that covers our ESG performance for the prior year. We use the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) reporting framework for the “Internet & Media Services” and “Media & Entertainment” industries. The ESG reports for 2019 and 2020 are available at ir.netflix.net. In addition, we will continue to publish our Inclusion Report and EEO-1 data on our website annually.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          7


Proposal 1

Our Board of Directors

Election of Directors

THE BOARD

UNANIMOUSLY

RECOMMENDS THAT

THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE

“FOR” RICHARD N. BARTON,

RODOLPHE BELMER,

BRADFORD L. SMITH AND ANNE M. SWEENEY

LOGO

Nominees

 

LOGO


DIRECTORS STANDING FOR ELECTION

Four Class I directors, Richard N. Barton, Rodolphe Belmer, Bradford L. Smith and Anne M. Sweeney, are to be elected at the Annual Meeting. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them for Messrs. Barton, Belmer, and Smith and Ms. Sweeney, each of whom is currently a director of the Company. If Messrs.Mr. Barton, Mr. Belmer, Mr. Smith or Ms. Sweeney is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for a substitute nominee designated by the Board to fill the vacancy. Messrs.Each of Mr. Barton, Mr. Belmer, Mr. Smith and Ms. Sweeney each has agreed to serve as a director of the Company if elected. The term of the office of directordirectors elected at this Annual Meeting will continue until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held in 20212024 or until such director’s successor has been duly elected or appointed and qualified, or until their earlier resignation or removal.

Required Vote

The four nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative Votes Cast will each be elected as Class I directors.

Netflix Recommendation

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW.

 

Nominee

  

Age

    

Principal Occupation

Richard N. Barton

  5053    Chief Executive ChairmanOfficer and co-founder of the Board of Zillow Group, Inc.Zillow-Group

Rodolphe Belmer

  4851    Chief Executive Officer of Eutelsat Communications S.A.

Bradford L. Smith

  5962    President and Chief Legal Officer of Microsoft Corp.

Anne M. Sweeney

  6063    FormerCo-Chair, Disney Media Networks and President, Disney/ABC Television Group

Each nominee has extensive business experience, education and personal skills that qualifies him or her to serve as an effective Board member. The specific experience, qualifications and skills of Messrs. Barton, Belmer, and Smith and Ms. Sweeney are set forth below. The Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates potential candidates for service on the Board. Mr. Belmer was recommended by executive officers

Required Vote

The four nominees receiving the highest number of the Companyaffirmative Votes Cast will each be elected as well as by entertainment and technology executives.Class I directors.

Richard N. Barton has served as one of the Company’s directors since 2002. In late 2004, Mr. Bartonco-founded Zillow Group, Inc. where he is now Executive Chairman of the Board. Additionally, Mr. Barton is a Venture Partner with Benchmark Capital. In 1994, Mr. Barton founded Expedia, Inc. and was its President, Chief Executive Officer and director from November 1999 to March 2003. Mr. Barton was a director of InterActiveCorp from February 2003 until January 2005. Mr. Barton also serves as a director for Avvo, Inc., Glassdoor.com, and Liberty Interactive. Mr. Barton holds a B.S. in general engineering: industrial economics from Stanford University.Netflix Recommendation

 

LOGO


The Board unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote “FOR” the nominees listed above.

4

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          9


Having foundedWho We Are

BOARD OVERVIEW

Our Board is composed of 12 highly experienced, talented, and qualified directors with experience as board members and executives at some of the world’s most successful internet-based companies, Mr. Barton provides strategic and technical insightcompanies. We believe that the Board is well situated to navigate the Board. As an executive chairman and director of other companies, Mr. Barton also brings managerial, operational and corporate governance experiencechanging competitive terrain that Netflix operates within. The Board has led Netflix through its evolution from a US DVD-by-mail company to the Board. In addition, Mr. Barton brings experience with respecta global streaming company to marketing products to consumers through the internet.

Rodolphe Belmer has served as one of the Company’s directors since January 2018. Since March 2016, Mr. Belmer has served as CEO of Eutelsat, the leading satellite operator in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. He previously held several roles at Canal + Group, which he joined in 2001, most recently serving as its CEO from 2012 to 2015. Mr. Belmer began his careerentertainment companies in the marketing department of Procter & Gamble France before joining McKinsey in 1998. He is a graduate of France’s HEC business school.

As a media executive located in France, Mr. Belmer brings a unique international perspective to the Board. In additional, his media experienceworld, while effectively managing risk and business acumen provides the Company with valuable insight as it expands its global operations.

Bradford L. Smith has served as one of the Company’s directorsoverseeing management performance. By successfully navigating this evolution, our annualized total stockholder return since March 2015. Mr. Smith has been with Microsoft since 1993 and became the general counsel and executive vice president of Legal and Corporate Affairsour initial public offering in 2002 and currently serves as the President and Chief Legal Officer. Prior to joining Microsoft hethrough December 31, 2020 was an associate and then partner at the Washington, D.C.-based firm of Covington and Burling. Mr. Smith holds a BA in international relations and economics from Princeton University and a JD from Columbia University School of Law. He also studied international law and economics at the Graduate Institute of International Studies in Geneva.

With a leading role at Microsoft, Mr. Smith brings to the Board broad business and international experience on a variety of issues including government affairs and public policy.

Anne M. Sweeney has served as one of the Company’s directors since March 2015. Most recently, Ms. Sweeney wasco-chair, Disney Media Networks, and president, Disney/ABC Television Group. Previously, Ms. Sweeney served as Chairman and CEO of the FX Networks, part of the Fox Entertainment Group of 21st Century Fox and spent more than 12 years at Viacom’s Nickelodeon network. Ms. Sweeney holds a BA from The College of New Rochelle and an Ed. M. from Harvard University.

Having held various senior positions with large entertainment companies, Ms. Sweeney brings broad strategic and operational experience to the Board. Her experience in the entertainment industry provides a unique business perspective to the Company as it builds its global internet TV network.

5


Directors Not Standing For Election

The members of the Board whose terms or directorships do not expire at the Annual Meeting and who are not standing for election at this year’s Annual Meeting are set forth below:40%.

 

Name

LOGO

 

AgeBoard Tenure

LOGO

Gender Diversity

Board balances fresh thinking, new perspectives, and emerging skill needs with institutional knowledge and stability

A quarter of directors are women.

LOGOLOGO

LOGO

LOGO

10          LOGO


OUR DIRECTORS

Directors standing for election:

LOGO

RICHARD BARTON

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2002 CLASS: I AGE: 53

COMMITTEES: AUDIT

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Having founded successful internet-based companies (including Zillow, Expedia and GlassDoor), Mr. Barton provides strategic and technical insight to the Board. In addition, Mr. Barton brings experience with respect to marketing products to consumers through the internet.

Also...

Mr. Barton was a venture partner at Benchmark, a venture capital firm that has been an early-stage investor in companies like Twitter, Instagram, Uber and Zillow, from 2005 until 2018. He has served on many public company boards. Mr. Barton holds a B.S. in general engineering: industrial economics from Stanford University.

Career Snapshot:

•  Chief Executive and co-founder of Zillow-Group (since 2010)

•  Co-founder and Chairman of GlassDoor (2007-2018)

•  Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Expedia (1996-2003)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Qurate (formerly Liberty Interactive)

•  Zillow Group

•  Altimeter Growth Corp.

•  Altimeter Growth Corp. 2

LOGO

RODOLPHE BELMER

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2018 CLASS: I AGE: 51

COMMITTEES: COMPENSATION

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

As a media executive located in France, Mr. Belmer brings a unique international perspective to the Board. In addition, his media experience and business acumen provide the Board with valuable insight as it expands its global operations.

Also...

Mr. Belmer began his career in the marketing department of Procter & Gamble France before joining McKinsey in 1998. He is a graduate of France’s HEC business school.

Career Snapshot:

•  CEO and director of Eutelsat, the leading satellite operator in Europe, the Middle East and Africa (since 2016)

•  CEO of Canal + Group (2012-2015); various additional roles since joining in 2001

Other Public Company Boards

•  None

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          11


LOGO

BRAD SMITH

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2015 CLASS: I AGE: 62

COMMITTEES: NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

With a leading role at Microsoft, Mr. Smith brings broad business and international experience on a variety of issues, including government affairs and public policy to the Board. Mr. Smith also brings experience playing a key role in representing Microsoft externally and in leading Microsoft’s work on a number of critical issues, including privacy, security, accessibility, environmental sustainability and digital inclusion, among others, which provides additional expertise to the Board.

Also...

Mr. Smith has led a push for diversity within Microsoft’s legal division, advocating for increasing employment of diverse employees at the company and associated law firms. Mr. Smith holds a B.A. in international relations and economics from Princeton, a J.D. from Columbia University School of Law and also studied international law and economics at the Graduate Institute of International Studies in Geneva.

Career Snapshot:

•  President and Chief Legal Officer of Microsoft (since 2015); he originally joined Microsoft in 1993

•  Associate and then Partner, Covington & Burling (1986-1993)

Other Public Company Boards

•  None

LOGO

ANNE SWEENEY

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2015 CLASS: I AGE: 63

COMMITTEES: COMPENSATION

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Ms. Sweeney has held various senior positions with large entertainment companies, which provided her with broad strategic and operational experience. Her experience in the entertainment industry provides a unique business perspective to the Board as Netflix builds its global internet TV network.

Also...

Ms. Sweeney’s entertainment experience spans more than three decades, including her oversight of Disney’s cable, broadcast and satellite properties globally for 18 years. During that time, she was charged with launching and running over 118 Disney Channels in 164 countries in 34 languages, and had oversight over various ABC properties including ABC Television Network, ABC Studios and the Disney ABC Cable Networks Group. Prior to Disney, she was CEO of FX Networks, Inc. from 1993 to 1996 and spent more than 12 years at Viacom’s Nickelodeon Network. She holds an Ed. M. From Harvard University and a B.A. from the College of New Rochelle.

Career Snapshot:

•  Co-chair of Disney Media Networks and President of Disney/ABC Television Group (1996-2015)

•  Chairman and CEO of FX Networks, part of the Fox Entertainment Group/21st Century Fox (1993-1996)

Other Public Company Boards

•  None

LOGO

12          LOGO


Directors not standing for election:

LOGO

REED HASTINGS

CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT OF THE COMPANY, AND CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

DIRECTOR AND CHAIRMAN SINCE: 1997 CLASS: III (EXPIRES 2023) AGE: 60
COMMITTEES: NONE

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Mr. Hastings, as co-founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer, deeply understands the technology and business of Netflix and brings strategic and operational insight to the Board. He is also a software engineer, holds an MSCS in Artificial Intelligence from Stanford University, and has unique management and industry insights.

Also...

Mr. Hastings is an active educational philanthropist: he served on the California State Board of education from 2000 to 2004, and after receiving his B.A. from Bowdoin College in 1983 served in the Peace Corps as a high school math teacher in Swaziland. Mr. Hastings previously served on the board of Facebook, Inc. from 2011-2019.

Career Snapshot:

•  Founder, Co-Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of Netflix (since 1997)

•  Founder, Pure Software (1991) through IPO (1995) and ultimate sale to Rational Software

Other Public Company Boards

•  None

LOGO

JAY C. HOAG

LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 1999 CLASS: III (EXPIRES 2023) AGE: 62

COMMITTEES: NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE (CHAIR)

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

As a venture capital investor, Mr. Hoag brings strategic insights and financial experience to the Board. He has evaluated, invested in and served as a board member on numerous companies, both public and private, and is familiar with a full range of corporate and board functions. His many years of experience in helping companies shape and implement strategy provide the Board with unique perspectives on matters such as risk management, corporate governance, talent selection and management.

Also...

Mr. Hoag has been a technology investor and venture capitalist for more than 38 years, involved in a large number of technology investments including Altiris (acquired by Symantec), CNET, Expedia, Facebook, Fandango (acquired by Comcast), Intuit, and Sybase. Mr. Hoag is on the Investment Advisory Committee at the University of Michigan, the Board of Trustees of Northwestern University, and the Board of Trust at Vanderbilt University. Previously, Mr. Hoag has served on the board of directors of numerous other public and private companies, including TechTarget, Inc. from 2004-2016. Mr. Hoag holds an M.B.A. from the University of Michigan and a B.A. from Northwestern University.

Career Snapshot:

•  Founding General Partner at TCV (Technology Crossover Ventures), a venture capital firm (since 1995)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Electronic Arts

•  Peloton Interactive

•  TCV Acquisition Corp.

•  TripAdvisor

•  Zillow Group

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          13


LOGO

MATHIAS DÖPFNER

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2018 CLASS: III (EXPIRES 2023) AGE: 58

COMMITTEES: COMPENSATION

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

As a media executive located in Germany, Mr. Döpfner brings international perspective, media experience and business acumen to the Board.

Also...

Mr. Döpfner has extensive experience in media and digital transformation and a strong track record of increasing revenues related to digital activities. He previously served on the boards of Vodafone Group plc (2015-2018) and Time Warner Inc. (2006-2018). Additionally, his relationships and honorary offices at entities including the American Academy, the American Jewish Committee and the European Publishers Council among many others provide him with relevant insight and perspective in international media. He studied Musicology, German and Theatrical Arts in Frankfurt and Boston.

Career Snapshot:

•  Chairman and CEO, Axel Springer SE, Europe’s leading digital publishing house (since 2002)

•  His former roles at Axel Springer SE include editor-in-chief of Die Welt (1998-2000) and as a member of the Management Board (starting in 2000)

•  Visiting Professor in media at University of Cambridge, St. John’s College (2010)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Warner Music Group

LOGO

TIMOTHY HALEY

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 1998 CLASS: II (EXPIRES 2022) AGE: 66
COMMITTEES: COMPENSATION (CHAIR)

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

As a venture capital investor, Mr. Haley brings strategic and financial experience to the Board. He has evaluated, invested in and served as a board member on numerous companies. His executive recruiting background also provides the Board with insight into talent selection and management.

Also...

Mr. Haley was President of Haley Associates, an executive recruiting firm serving the high technology industry from 1986 - 1998, and serves on the boards of several private companies. Mr. Haley holds a B.A. from Santa Clara University.

Career Snapshot:

•  Managing Director, Redpoint Ventures, a venture capital firm (since 1999)

•  Managing Director, Institutional Venture Partners, a venture capital firm (since 1998)

Other Public Company Boards

•  2U, Inc.

•  ThredUp

•  Zuora

LOGO

14          LOGO


LOGO

LESLIE KILGORE

DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2012 (INDEPENDENT SINCE 2015) CLASS: II (EXPIRES 2022) AGE: 55
COMMITTEES: AUDIT

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Ms. Kilgore’s experience as a marketing executive with internet retailers and consumer product companies provides a unique business perspective and her numerous managerial positions provide strategic and operational experience to the Board.

Also...

As our former Chief Marketing Officer, Ms. Kilgore deeply understands the Netflix business and is able to bring years of marketing experience to the Board. She holds an M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business and a B.S. from The Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania. She previously served on the board of LinkedIn Corp., and she currently serves on the boards of several other companies.

Career Snapshot:

•  Chief Marketing Officer of Netflix (2000-2012)

•  Director of Marketing at Amazon (1999-2000)

•  Brand manager at The Procter & Gamble Company (1992-1999)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Medallia

•  Pinterest

LOGO

STRIVE MASIYIWA

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2020 CLASS: II (EXPIRES 2022) AGE: 60

COMMITTEES: NONE

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

As the Chairman and founder of Econet Global, a telecommunications and technology group with operations and investments in 29 countries in Africa and Europe, Mr. Masiyiwa provides a unique international perspective to the Board. In addition, his experience in building businesses across Africa and the world provides the Company with valuable insight as it expands globally.

Also...

Mr. Masiyiwa serves on several international boards including Unilever Plc, National Geographic Society, Asia Society, and the Global Advisory boards of Bank of America, the Council on Foreign Relations (in the US), Stanford University, and the Prince of Wales Trust for Africa, and is a longstanding board member of the United States Holocaust Museum’s Committee on Conscience. A former board member of the Rockefeller Foundation for 15 years, he is Chairman Emeritus of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) and African Union Special Envoy to the continent’s COVID response. He received a BSc in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the University of Wales. Mr. Masiyiwa has received honorary doctorates from Morehouse College, Yale University, Nelson Mandela University and Cardiff University.

Career Snapshot:

•  Founder and Executive Chairman of Econet Global (1993-Present)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Unilever Plc

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          15


LOGO

ANN MATHER

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2010 CLASS: II (EXPIRES 2022) AGE: 61

COMMITTEES: AUDIT (CHAIR, FINANCIAL EXPERT)

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Ms. Mather’s experience as an executive with several major media companies provides a unique business perspective. As a former CFO and senior finance executive at major corporations, she brings more than 20 years of financial and accounting expertise to the Board. Additionally, Ms. Mather’s numerous managerial positions and service on public company boards provides strategic, operational and corporate governance experience.

Also...

Ms. Mather previously served on the board of Shutterfly, Inc., a photography and image-sharing company (2013-2019) and Glu Mobile Inc., a publisher of mobile games (2005-2021). She has also been an independent trustee to the board of trustees of Dodge & Cox Funds, a mutual fund, since May 2011. She received her M.A. from Cambridge University, and is an Honorary Fellow of Sidney Sussex College Cambridge.

Career Snapshot:

•  Executive Vice President and CFO of Pixar (1999 - 2004)

•  Executive Vice President and CFO of Village Roadshow Pictures (1999)

•  Various executive positions at The Walt Disney Company (1993-1999)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Alphabet (formerly Google)

•  Airbnb

•  Bumble

•  Arista Networks

LOGO

TED SARANDOS

CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF CONTENT OFFICER OF THE COMPANY

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2020 CLASS: III (EXPIRES 2023) AGE: 56

COMMITTEES: NONE

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Mr. Sarandos, as Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Content Officer, is integral to developing corporate strategy and oversees the teams responsible for the acquisition, creation and promotion of all Netflix content including original series from around the world. His in-depth knowledge about Netflix and experience in the entertainment industry provide a unique business perspective to the Board.

Also...

Mr. Sarandos has been responsible for all content operations since 2000, and led the Company’s transition into original content production that began in 2013 with the launch of series such as House of Cards, Arrested Development and Orange is the New Black. With more than 20 years’ experience in home entertainment, he is recognized in the industry as an innovator in film acquisition and distribution and was named one of Time Magazine’s 100 Most Influential People of 2013. He is a Henry Crown Fellow at the Aspen Institute and serves on the board of Exploring The Arts, a nonprofit focused on arts in schools. Mr. Sarandos also serves on the Film Advisory Board for the Tribeca and Los Angeles Film Festivals, is an American Cinematheque board member, an Executive Committee Member of the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences and is a trustee of the American Film Institute.

Career Snapshot:

•  Co-Chief Executive Officer (since July 2020) and Chief Content Officer of Netflix (since 2000)

•  Executive at video distributor ETD and Video City/West Coast video, a video rental retail chain

•  Producer/Executive Producer for award-winning and critically acclaimed documentaries and independent films including the Emmy-nominated Outrage and Tony Bennett: The Music Never Ends.

Other Public Company Boards

•  Spotify

LOGO

16          LOGO


BOARD SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE

Our Board believes that having a diverse mix of directors with complementary skills, experience, and expertise is important to meeting its oversight responsibility. That diversity, combined with transparent and broad access to information and exposure to management beyond the executive officers, allows the Board to exercise effective management oversight and to ensure the care of our stockholders’ interests. Below are a number of skills that our Board members bring to Netflix. If an individual is not listed under a particular attribute, it does not signify a director’s lack of ability to contribute in such area.

LOGO  

Leadership

  

Class/Term Expiration

Experience and expertise in identifying and developing opportunities for long-term value creation, including experience in driving innovation, opening markets, improving operations, identifying risks, and executing successfully.

Richard Barton

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Timothy Haley

Reed Hastings

Jay Hoag

Leslie Kilgore

Strive Masiyiwa

Ann Mather

Brad Smith

Ted Sarandos

Anne Sweeney

Timothy M. Haley

LOGO  

Strategy

  63

Experience and expertise in identifying and developing opportunities for long-term value creation, including experience in driving innovation, opening markets, improving operations, identifying risks, and executing successfully.

 Class II/2019

Richard Barton

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Timothy Haley

Reed Hastings

Jay Hoag

Leslie Kilgore

Strive Masiyiwa

Ann Mather

Ted Sarandos

Brad Smith

Anne Sweeney

Leslie Kilgore

LOGO  

Finance & Accounting

  52

Management or oversight of the finance function of an enterprise, resulting in proficiency in complex financial management, capital allocation, and financial reporting processes.

 Class II/2019

Richard Barton

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Timothy Haley

Reed Hastings

Jay Hoag

Leslie Kilgore

Ann Mather

Anne Sweeney

Ann Mather

LOGO  

Entertainment & Media

  58

Experience and expertise with the entertainment and media industry, resulting in a deep understanding of consumer expectations and innovations in content and delivery.

 Class II/2019

Richard Barton

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Reed Hastings

Leslie Kilgore

Ann Mather

Ted Sarandos

Anne Sweeney

Susan Rice

LOGO  

Demographic Diversity

  53

Representation of gender, ethnic, race, geographic, cultural, or other perspectives that expand the Board’s understanding of the needs and viewpoints of our members, partners, employees, governments, and other stakeholders worldwide.

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Leslie Kilgore

Strive Masiyiwa

Ann Mather

Anne Sweeney

LOGO

     Class II/20192021 PROXY STATEMENT          17


Reed Hastings

LOGO  

Global Business & Government Relations

  57

Expertise in global business cultures, consumer preferences, and /or government relations gained through local experience in international markets or senior positions overseeing public policy.

 Class III/2020

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Strive Masiyiwa

Ann Mather

Brad Smith

Jay C. Hoag

LOGO  

Technology

  59

Experience and expertise in technology-related business or technology functions, resulting in knowledge of how to anticipate technological trends, understand and manage technology related risks, generate disruptive innovation, and extend or create new business models.

 Class III/2020

Richard Barton

Reed Hastings

Jay Hoag

Strive Masiyiwa

Brad Smith

A. George (Skip) Battle

LOGO  

Marketing

  74

Experience and expertise developing strategies to grow market share, package and position product offerings, build brand awareness and equity, and enhance enterprise reputation.

Richard Barton

Rodolphe Belmer

Leslie Kilgore

Ted Sarandos

LOGO  

Human Capital Management

  Class III/2020

Experience and expertise related to human resource issues such as attracting and retaining talent, succession planning, engagement of employees, and the development and evolution of culture, including the alignment of culture and long-term strategy.

Timothy Haley

Reed Hastings

Ted Sarandos

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Barton, Belmer, Döpfner, Haley, Hoag, Masiyiwa and Smith, and Mses. Kilgore, Mather, and Sweeney are independent under the applicable rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market; therefore, every member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee is an independent director in accordance with those standards. In addition, the Board determined that Ambassador Rice was independent during the time she served on the Board.

LOGO

18          LOGO


How We are Selected,

Elected and Evaluated

CONSIDERATION OF DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Director Qualifications

In discharging its responsibilities to nominate candidates for election to the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee has not specified any minimum qualifications for serving on the Board. However, the Nominating and Governance Committee endeavors to evaluate, propose and approve candidates with business experience, diversity, as well as personal skills and knowledge with respect to technology, finance, marketing, financial reporting and any other areas that may be expected to contribute to an effective Board. With respect to diversity, the committee may consider such factors as diversity in viewpoint, professional experience, education, international experience, skills and other individual qualifications and attributes that contribute to board heterogeneity, including characteristics such as gender, race, and national origin.

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors

The Nominating and Governance Committee utilizes a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. Candidates may come to the attention of the Nominating and Governance Committee through management, current Board members, stockholders or other persons. These candidates are evaluated at meetings of the Nominating and Governance Committee as necessary and discussed by the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee from time to time. Candidates may be considered at any point during the year.

The Nominating and Governance Committee considers properly submitted stockholder nominations for candidates for the Board. Following verification of the stockholder status of persons proposing candidates, recommendations are aggregated and considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee. If any materials are provided by a stockholder in connection with the nomination of a director candidate, such materials are forwarded to the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee also reviews materials provided by professional search firms or other parties in connection with a nominee who is not proposed by a stockholder.

Stockholder Nominees

The Nominating and Governance Committee considers properly submitted stockholder nominations for candidates for membership on the Board as described above under “Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors.” Any stockholder nominations proposed for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for Board membership. In addition, they should be submitted within the time frame as specified under “Stockholder Proposals” above and mailed to: Netflix, Inc., 100 Winchester Circle, Los Gatos, California 95032, Attention: Secretary.

Our bylaws provide a proxy access right for stockholders, pursuant to which a stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, owning at least three percent of outstanding shares of our common stock continuously for at least three years, may nominate and include in our annual meeting proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of (a) two directors or (b) twenty percent of the Board, subject to certain limitations and provided that the stockholders and nominees satisfy the requirements specified in our bylaws.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          19


OUR BOARD EVALUATION PROCESS

Each year, our Board conducts a self-evaluation process to help assure and enhance its performance. This process is overseen by the Nominating and Governance Committee, and involves interviews of each director by our Chief Legal Officer. Feedback is sought primarily in the following areas: (a) the Board’s effectiveness, structure, culture and composition, (b) the quality of and access to information shared with the Board about our business and (c) performance of the directors and quality of Board discussions.

How We Govern

and are Governed

OUR APPROACH TO CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Philosophy

Netflix operates in a dynamic industry and has extensive business experience, educationbeen in a state of constant innovation since inception. We have redefined how people watch video—first through DVD-by-mail, then streaming video, and personal skills in their respective fields that qualify them to serve as an effective Board member. The specific experience, qualifications and skills of each director is set forth below.

Timothy M. Haley has servednow as one of the Company’s directorsworld’s leading entertainment services with approximately 208 million memberships in 190 countries. Our success has not gone unnoticed, and we are seeing increasing competition, even as this dynamic market continues to evolve.

Our corporate governance structure is built against this backdrop. Governance, in this context, means finding the right balance of rights and responsibilities among stockholders, the Board, and management, and ensuring that there are appropriate checks and balances in place. With the rapid evolution of technology and the changing media landscape, we are continually adjusting our service to meet the dynamic needs and desires of our consumers. Our governance structure is built to help us to do that. Our focus is on creating long-term value for our stockholders, and we have been successful at that – since 1998. Mr. Haleyour initial public offering in 2002, annualized total stockholder return through December 31, 2020 was 40%.

Our governance structure is unconventional. We have several provisions that give our Board and our management team the freedom to be forward-thinking, such as making investments to build our own production studios and developing our own animation capabilities, with the confidence that they will be able to see those investments to fruition. At the same time, we have paid attention to our stockholders and increased our accountability to them by adopting provisions such as proxy access. We are proud of our governance structure, both because of how it has supported our success to date and for being innovative, such as the way that our Board has unfettered access to management and is able to seek information directly from employees all around the enterprise.

We strive to stay in tune with our ownership base. Our Board and our management team engage directly with our stockholders, and our Board and its committees consider stockholders’ feedback in assessing our governance structure, including our compensation program. These discussions provide a good opportunity to share views and answer questions; the input from our stockholders will continue to inform our ongoing evaluation of our structure.

We believe our approach to governance will continue to provide the greatest benefit to Netflix and our stockholders. We realize that elements of our structure may not fit within the standard corporate governance practices and that some stockholders take a different view. But we believe that Netflix’s long-term value is currently best optimized with our approach to governance.

LOGO

20          LOGO


Stockholder Engagement and 2020 Stockholder Proposals

At our 2020 annual meeting, stockholders presented three proposals for vote. One proposal requested additional disclosure around political spending, and the proposal did not receive majority support from stockholders. The second proposal requested that we lower the two-thirds supermajority requirement for amending our charter and bylaws to a simple majority. This proposal did receive majority support from stockholders. The third proposal sought a public report regarding our equal employment opportunity policy, and received less than 1% support from stockholders.

We consider the voting results for stockholders proposals in our Board discussions and as we contemplate our governance structure.

We also engaged with stockholders to solicit feedback on a broad range of topics, including these stockholder proposals. We held 10 virtual meetings in the fall of 2020 with stockholders representing approximately 25% of our common stock outstanding. Members of the Board, accompanied by Company representatives as appropriate, participated in each of these conversations. We also held numerous engagement meetings earlier in 2020, prior to our 2020 annual meeting.

In addition to governance and compensation matters, our discussions in 2020 centered on our approach to environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters; diversity, equity and inclusion; our response to the COVID-19 pandemic; and our dual CEO management structure. Investors expressed a desire to see improved disclosure on environmental and social matters, which the recent hire of our Sustainability Officer is intended to help address. We have also recently increased our disclosure about these topics partly in response to investor feedback by publishing an Inclusion Report in January 2021 along with our EEO-1 and ESG reports.

We also discussed our approach to governance, including our goal of ensuring that we are best able to execute our long-term vision, which we believe is in the best interests of all stockholders. Investors understood our rationale for our governance structure, even if they disagreed with it. While investors inquired about our dual CEO model and how it works for Netflix, none expressed that it was inappropriate for us. We explained that the dual CEO model formalized the prior working relationship between Reed and Ted, and was an effective leadership model to further support our continued growth and international expansion. Stockholders gave us high marks for our response to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as our focus on employee well-being and our efforts to support the creative industry through our establishment of hardship funds.

The feedback on our compensation program was limited, with many investors understanding and supportive of our approach to compensation. While we did not hear thematic concerns about our compensation program during our meetings, one stockholder questioned some components of our compensation program, including the ability of our executives to allocate their compensation between cash and stock options.

We further note that our current practice with respect to our supermajority provision is a mainstream practice. According to data from FactSet, more than forty percent of S&P 500 companies have supermajority provisions in place, and our threshold is common and among the lower thresholds that companies have adopted. After consideration of stockholder feedback, industry trend data, and our corporate governance philosophy, we decided at this point not to lower the voting requirement from its current supermajority level. A simple majority vote requirement already applies to most corporate matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. We believe that in the current dynamic business environment, the supermajority we have in place is appropriate to increase stability in our operations, while still being set low enough for stockholders to have a voice on issues where there is strong consensus. We will continue to monitor and evaluate this issue.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          21


THE ROLE OF THE BOARD IN RISK OVERSIGHT

The Board’s role in our risk oversight process includes reviewing and discussing with members of management areas of material risk to the Company, including strategic, operational, financial and legal risks. The Board as a whole primarily deals with matters related to strategic and operational risk. The Audit Committee deals with matters of financial and legal risk, including cybersecurity risk. The Compensation Committee addresses risks related to compensation and other talent-related matters. The Nominating and Governance Committee manages risks associated with Board independence and corporate governance. Committees report to the full Board regarding their respective considerations and actions. Throughout 2020, in response to the co-founderCOVID-19 pandemic, management, with the support of our Board and Audit Committee, engaged, assessed and led our efforts to mitigate operational, employee and other risks to our business associated with the pandemic.

How We are Organized

BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES

The Board held five meetings during 2020. Each Board member attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of Board meetings and meetings of the Board committees.

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board has three standing committees: (1) the Compensation Committee; (2) the Audit Committee; and (3) the Nominating and Governance Committee.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

In 2020, the Compensation Committee of the Board consisted of four non-employee directors: Messrs. Belmer, Döpfner, Haley (Chair), and Ms. Sweeney. Mr. Hoag also served on the Compensation Committee until Mr. Döpfner’s appointment to the Compensation Committee in March 2020. Each member of the Compensation Committee is independent in compliance with the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market as they pertain to Compensation Committee members. Each of the Compensation Committee members is also a non-employee director under Rule 16b-3 of Redpoint Ventures, a venture capital firm,the Exchange Act and has been a Managing Directoran outside director under section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves all forms of compensation to be provided to our executive officers and directors. For a description of the role of the executive officers in recommending compensation and the role of any compensation consultants, please see the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below. The Compensation Committee held four meetings in 2020. Each member attended all the Compensation Committee meetings held in 2020.

The Report of the Compensation Committee is included in this Proxy Statement. In addition, the Board has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, which is available on our Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee of the Board consists of three non-employee directors: Mr. Barton, and Mses. Kilgore and Mather (Chair), each of whom is independent in compliance with the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market as they pertain to audit committee members. The Board has determined that Ms. Mather is an audit committee financial expert as defined by Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

LOGO

22          LOGO


The Audit Committee engages the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, since October 1999.reviews the Company’s financial controls, evaluates the scope of the annual audit, reviews audit results, consults with management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm prior to the presentation of financial statements to stockholders and, as appropriate, initiates inquiries into aspects of the Company’s internal accounting controls and financial affairs. The Audit Committee met seven times in 2020. Each member attended at least 75% of the Audit Committee meetings held in 2020.

The Report of the Audit Committee is included in this Proxy Statement. In addition, the Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which is available on our Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board consists of two non-employee directors, Messrs. Hoag (Chair) and Smith. Ambassador Rice served on the Nominating and Governance Committee through her resignation date, January 20, 2021. Each director serving on the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews and approves candidates for election and to fill vacancies on the Board, including re-nominations of members whose terms are due to expire, and reviews and provides guidance to the Board on corporate governance matters. The Nominating and Governance Committee met two times in 2020. Each member attended all the Nominating and Governance Committee meetings held in 2020, other than Mr. HaleySmith who did not attend one meeting.

The Board has beenadopted a Managing Directorwritten charter for the Nominating and Governance Committee, which is available on our investor relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

None of Institutional Venture Partners, a venture capital firm, since February 1998. From June 1986 to February 1998, Mr. Haley was the President of Haley Associates, anour executive recruiting firm in the high technology industry. Mr. Haley currentlyofficers serves on the board of directors or compensation committee of several private companies. Mr. Haley holds a B.A. from Santa Clara University.

Ascompany that has an executive officer that serves on our Board or Compensation Committee. No member of our Board is an executive officer of a venture capital investor, Mr. Haley brings strategic and financial experience to the Board. He has evaluated, investedcompany in and served as a board member on numerous companies. His executive recruiting background also provides the Board with insight into talent selection and management.

Leslie Kilgore has served aswhich one of the Company’s directors since 2012. From 2010 to 2016, Ms. Kilgore was a director of LinkedIn Corporation and servedour executive officers serves as chair on its compensation committee. Ms. Kilgore served as the Company’s Chief Marketing Officer (formerly Vice President of Marketing) from 2000 until her resignation in February 2012. From February 1999 to March 2000, Ms. Kilgore served as Director of Marketing for Amazon.com, Inc., an internet retailer. Ms. Kilgore served as a brand manager for The Procter & Gamble Company, a manufacturer and marketer of consumer products, from August 1992 to February 1999. Ms. Kilgore holds an M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business and a B.S. from The Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.

Ms. Kilgore’s numerous managerial positions provide strategic and operational experience to the Board. Her experience as a marketing executive with internet retailers and consumer product companies provides a unique business perspective. As the former Chief Marketing Officer of Netflix, Ms. Kilgore deeply understands the Netflix business and is able to bring years of marketing experience to the Board.

Ann Mather has served as one of the Company’s directors since 2010. Ms. Mather has also been a member of the board of directors of: Glu Mobile Inc.or compensation committee of that company.

In 2020, the Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Belmer, Döpfner (from March 2020), Haley, Hoag (through March 2020) and Ms. Sweeney, none of whom is currently or was formerly an officer or employee of the Company. None of Messrs. Belmer, Döpfner, Haley, or Hoag or Ms. Sweeney had a publisherrelationship with the Company that required disclosure under Item 404 of mobile games, since SeptemberRegulation S-K. In addition to Messrs. Belmer, Döpfner, Haley, and Hoag and Ms. Sweeney, our Co-Chief Executive Officer, Reed Hastings, and Chief Talent Officer participated in the executive compensation process for the year ended December 31, 2020 as described below in the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

POLICY REGARDING DIRECTOR ATTENDANCE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Our policy regarding directors’ attendance at the annual meetings of stockholders and their attendance record at last year’s annual meeting of stockholders can be found on our Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

 

6LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          23


THE BOARD’S LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

The Board combines the role of Chairman and Chief Executive. While the Board reassesses maintaining the combined role from time to time, the Board believes that Mr. Hastings, a Co-Chief Executive Officer, is best situated to serve as Chairman because he is the director most familiar with our business and industry and is therefore best able to identify the strategic priorities to be discussed by the Board. The Board also believes that combining the role of Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer facilitates information flow between management and the Board and fosters strategic development and execution. The Board has appointed Jay Hoag as its lead independent director. As lead independent director, Mr. Hoag’s responsibilities include:

coordinating the activities of the independent directors, and authorization to call meetings of the independent directors;

coordinating with the Co-Chief Executive Officers and corporate secretary to set the agenda for Board meetings, soliciting and taking into account suggestions from other members of the Board;

chairing executive sessions of the independent directors;

providing feedback and perspective to the Co-Chief Executive Officers about discussions among the independent directors;

helping facilitate communication among the Co-Chief Executive Officers and the independent directors;

presiding at Board meetings where the Chair is not present; and

performing other duties assigned from time to time by the Board.

In addition, the Board maintains effective independent oversight through a number of governance practices, including, open and direct communication with management, input on meeting agendas, annual performance evaluations and regular executive sessions.

How to Communicate with Us

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

We provide a process for stockholders to send communications to the Board through the email address board@netflix.com. Information regarding stockholder communications with the Board can be found on the Company’s Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

LOGO

24          LOGO


How We are Paid

Since 2015, none of our directors receive cash for services they provide as directors or members of Board committees but may be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses for attending Board and Board committee meetings. Each non-employee director receives stock options pursuant to the Director Equity Compensation Plan. The Director Equity Compensation Plan provides for a monthly grant of stock options to each non-employee director of the Company in consideration for services provided to us and subject to the terms and conditions of our equity compensation plans.

We believe that for our company, compensating directors only with options is appropriate and creates the right incentives and long-term value alignment with stockholders. Without long-term value creation, directors are not compensated as the intrinsic value of options on dates of grant is zero.

The actual number of options granted each month to each of our directors is determined by the following formula: $25,000 / ([fair market value on the date of grant] x 0.40). Each monthly grant is made on the first trading day of the month, is fully vested upon grant and is exercisable at a strike price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. The table below sets forth information concerning the compensation of our non-employee directors during 2020.

In each of 2018 and 2019, Compensia advised the Board on our compensation program for our Board for the upcoming year, based on a comparison against our peer group’s board compensation programs and other compensation-related developments. The prior time Compensia reviewed our Board’s compensation program was in 2015, and we adjusted our Board’s compensation program in 2016. We have not made any changes to the compensation program for our Board since then.

Name

  

Option Awards

($)(1)

   

Total

($)

 

Richard N. Barton

   376,943        376,943(4) 

Rodolphe Belmer

   377,175        377,175(5) 

Mathias Döpfner

   377,201        377,201(6) 

Timothy M. Haley

   376,943        376,943(7) 

Jay C. Hoag

   376,943        376,943(8) 

Leslie Kilgore

   376,943        376,943(9) 

Strive Masiyiwa(2)

   —         

Ann Mather

   376,943        376,943(10) 

Susan E. Rice(3)

   377,017        377,017(11) 

Bradford L. Smith

   376,943        376,943(12) 

Anne M. Sweeney

   376,943        376,943(13) 

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          25


(1)

Option awards reflect the monthly grant of stock options to each non-employee director on the dates and at the aggregate grant date fair values computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 as shown below. Only options to purchase whole shares are granted with any remaining amount of the grant value carried over to the next monthly grant. The differences in option award values for each of Messrs. Belmer and Döpfner and Ambassador Rice reflect the different carryover amounts relating to the appointment month for each director. For a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation reflected in the Option Awards column, refer to Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on January 28, 2021.

Grant Date

Fair Value
($)

1/2/2020

29,336  

2/3/2020

29,485  

3/2/2020

29,407  

4/1/2020

31,573  

5/1/2020

31,800  

6/1/2020

31,752  

7/1/2020

32,038  

8/3/2020

32,381  

9/1/2020

32,127  

10/1/2020

32,261  

11/2/2020

32,618  

12/1/2020

32,166  

(2)

Mr. Strive Masiyiwa was appointed to the Board on December 16, 2020 and did not receive a prorated grant of stock options.

(3)

Ambassador Susan Rice served on the Board through January 20, 2021.

(4)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Barton at December 31, 2020 was 31,411.

(5)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Belmer at December 31, 2020 was 4,078.

(6)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Döpfner at December 31, 2020 was 4,654.

(7)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Haley at December 31, 2020 was 37,361.

(8)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Hoag at December 31, 2020 was 34,162.

(9)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Kilgore at December 31, 2020 was 11,240.

(10)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Mather at December 31, 2020 was 16,401.

(11)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Rice at December 31, 2020 was 4,426.

(12)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Smith at December 31, 2020 was 23,407.

(13)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Sweeney at December 31, 2020 was 8,240.

LOGO

26          LOGO


Certain Relationships and

Related Transactions

AGREEMENTS WITH DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. These agreements require us to indemnify such individuals, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, for certain liabilities to which they may become subject as a result of their affiliation with us.

PROCEDURES FOR APPROVAL OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

We have a written policy concerning the review and approval of related party transactions. Potential related party transactions are identified through an internal review process that includes a review of payments made in connection with transactions in which related persons may have had a direct or indirect material interest. Those transactions that are determined to be related party transactions under Item 404 of Regulation S-K are submitted for review by the Audit Committee for approval and to conduct a conflicts-of-interest analysis. The individual identified as the “related party” may not participate in any review or analysis of the related party transaction.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          27


Proposal 2

Our Auditors

Ratification of

Appointment of

Independent Registered

Public Accounting Firm

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY

RECOMMENDS THAT THE

STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT

OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS

THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING

FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING

DECEMBER 31, 2021

LOGO

LOGO


The Audit Committee of the Board has selected Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”), an independent registered public accounting firm, to audit the financial statements of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2021. We are submitting its selection of Ernst & Young for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. A representative of Ernst & Young is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions. Ernst & Young has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since March 21, 2012. Neither applicable law nor our bylaws require that stockholders ratify the selection of Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firm. However, we are submitting the selection of Ernst & Young to stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If stockholders do not ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain Ernst & Young. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, at its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the year if they determine that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

During 2020 and 2019, fees for services provided by Ernst & Young was as follows (in thousands):

  

 

  2020   2019 

Audit Fees

  $5,351  $4,936

Audit-Related Fees

   70    

Tax Fees

   2,096   2,927

Total

  $7,517  $7,863

Audit Fees include amounts related to the audit of our annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, and quarterly review of the financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Audit fees also include amounts related to accounting consultations and services rendered in connection with the Company’s issuance of senior notes in 2020 and 2019, respectively, as well as fees for statutory audit filings.

Audit-Related Fees include fees related to assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, including attestation services that are not required by statute or regulation.

Tax Fees include fees billed for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services.

There were no other fees billed by Ernst & Young for services rendered to us, other than the services described above, in 2020 and 2019.

The Audit Committee has determined that the rendering of non-audit services by Ernst & Young was compatible with maintaining their independence.

POLICY ON AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL OF AUDIT AND PERMISSIBLE NON-AUDIT SERVICES OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year, and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          29


public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. During 2020, services provided by Ernst & Young were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with this policy.

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of the majority of the Votes Cast is required for ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021. The vote is an advisory vote, and therefore not binding.

Netflix Recommendation

LOGO

The Board unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021.

LOGO

30          LOGO


Report of the Audit Committee

of the Board

The Audit Committee engages and supervises the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. Management has the primary responsibility for the preparation of financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 with management, including a discussion of the quality of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments made by management and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Audit Committee reviewed with Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst��& Young”), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, who is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, its judgments as to the quality of the Company’s accounting principles and the other matters required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, including the matters required by Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young its independence from management and the Company, including the written disclosures and the letter regarding its independence as required by PCAOB Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence.

The Audit Committee also reviewed the fees paid to Ernst & Young during the year ended December 31, 2020 for audit and non-audit services, which fees are described under the heading “Principal Accountant Fees and Services.” The Audit Committee has determined that the rendering of all non-audit services by Ernst & Young were compatible with maintaining its independence.

The Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young the overall scope and plans for its audit. The Audit Committee met with Ernst & Young, with and without management present, to discuss the results of its examinations, its evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Audit Committee of the Board

Richard N. Barton

Leslie Kilgore

Ann Mather

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          31


LOGO


2005 and serves on its nominating and governance committee; Google, Inc., since November 2005 and serves as chair of its audit committee; MGM Holdings Inc. (“MGM”), the independent, privately-held motion picture, television, home video, and theatrical production and distribution company, since 2010; Shutterfly, Inc., a manufacturer and digital retailer of personalized products and services, since May 2013; and Arista Networks, a provider of cloud networking services, since July 2013, and serves on its audit committee. Ms. Mather has also been an independent trustee to the Dodge & Cox Funds board of trustees since May 2011. Ms. Mather was previously a director of: Central European Media Enterprises Group, a developer and operator of national commercial television channels and stations in Central and Eastern Europe, from 2004 to 2009; Zappos.com, Inc., a privately held, online retailer, until it was acquired by Amazon.com, Inc. in 2009; Ariat International, Inc., a privately-held manufacturer of footwear for equestrian athletes, from 2005 to 2012; MoneyGram International, a global payment services company, and served as chair of its audit committee, from 2010 to 2013; and Solazyme, Inc., a renewable oil and bioproducts company, from 2011 to 2014. From 1999 to 2004, Ms. Mather was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pixar, a computer animation studio. Prior to her service at Pixar, Ms. Mather was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Village Roadshow Pictures, the film production division of Village Roadshow Limited. From 1993 to 1999, she held various executive positions at The Walt Disney Company, including Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration for its Buena Vista International Theatrical Division. Ms. Mather was made an Honorary Fellow of Sidney Sussex College Cambridge in October 2016. Ms. Mather holds a Master of Arts degree from Cambridge University.LOGO

Ms. Mather’s numerous managerial positions and her service on several public company boards provides strategic, operational and corporate governance experience to the Board. Her experience as an executive with several major media companies provides unique business perspective. As a former chief financial officer and senior finance executive at major corporations and her service on the audit committee of several publicly traded companies, Ms. Mather brings financial and accounting expertise to the Board.OUR COMPANY                     

Susan Rice joined the Company’s Board of Directors in 2018. Ambassador Rice is a former US National Security Advisor and Ambassador to the United Nations. She is currently a Distinguished Visiting Research Fellow at American University’s School of International Service,Non-ResidentEXECUTIVE OFFICERS                      Senior Fellow at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, and Contributing Opinion Writer for the New York Times.

From 2013-2017, Ambassador Rice directed the National Security Council staff, chaired the Cabinet-level National Security Principals committee, provided the daily national security briefing to President Barack Obama, and was responsible for the formulation, coordination and implementation of all aspects of the administration’s foreign and national security policy, intelligence and military efforts. From 2009 to 2013, she served as the US Permanent Representative to the United Nations and as a cabinet member.

Ambassador Rice received her Master’s degree (M.Phil.) and PhD (D.Phil.) in International Relations from New College, Oxford University, England, where she was a Rhodes Scholar, and her BA in History with honors from Stanford University in 1986. In 2017, French President Francois Hollande presented Ambassador Rice with the Award of Commander, the Legion of Honor of France, for her contributions to Franco-American relations.

As a US diplomat and National Security Advisor, Ambassador Rice brings her unique experience in government affairs and public policy matters to the Board.

Reed Hastingsco-founded Netflix in 1997 and has served as Chairman of the Board since inception.

 

7


In 1991, Mr. Hastings founded Pure Software, which made tools for software developers. After a 1995 IPO, and several acquisitions, Pure was acquired by Rational Software in 1997.

Mr. Hastings is an active educational philanthropist and served on the California State BoardOur executive officers as of Education from 2000 to 2004. He is currently on the board of several educational organizations including CCSA, Dreambox Learning, KIPP, and Pahara.

Mr. Hastings is also a board member of Facebook, and was on the board of Microsoft from 2007 to 2012.

Mr. Hastings received a BA from Bowdoin College in 1983, and an MSCS in Artificial Intelligence from Stanford University in 1988. Between Bowdoin and Stanford, Mr. Hastings served in the Peace CorpsApril 23, 2021 are as a high school math teacher in Swaziland.

AsCo-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Netflix, Mr. Hastings deeply understands the technology and business of Netflix. He brings strategic and operational insight to the Board. Mr. Hastings is also a software engineer and has unique management and industry insights.

Jay C. Hoag has served as one of the Company’s directors since 1999. Since 1995, Mr. Hoag has served as a founding General Partner at Technology Crossover Ventures, a venture capital firm. Mr. Hoag serves on the board of directors of Electronic Arts, Inc. and Zillow Group, Inc. and several private companies. Mr. Hoag is on the Investment Advisory Committee at the University of Michigan, the Board of Trustees of Northwestern University, and the Board of Trust at the Vanderbilt University. Previously, Mr. Hoag has served on the board of directors of numerous other public and private companies. Mr. Hoag holds an M.B.A. from the University of Michigan and a B.A. from Northwestern University.

As a venture capital investor, Mr. Hoag brings strategic insights and financial experience to the Board. He has evaluated, invested in and served as a board member on numerous companies, both public and private, and is familiar with a full range of corporate and board functions. His many years of experience in helping companies shape and implement strategy provide the Board with unique perspectives on matters such as risk management, corporate governance, talent selection and management.

A. George (Skip) Battle has served as one of the Company’s directors since 2005. Mr. Battle was previously Executive Chairman of the Board of Ask Jeeves, Inc. which was acquired by IAC/InterActiveCorp in July 2005. He was Chief Executive Officer of Ask Jeeves from 2000 to 2003. From 1968 until his retirement in 1995, Mr. Battle served in management roles at Arthur Andersen LLP and then Andersen Consulting LLP (now Accenture), where he became worldwide managing partner of market development and a member of the firm’s executive committee. Educated at Dartmouth College and the Stanford Graduate School of Business, Mr. Battle currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Fair Isaac Corporation and as a director of Workday, Inc. and Expedia, Inc. He was previously a director of Advent Software, Inc., OpenTable, Inc., the Masters Select family of mutual funds, and LinkedIn Corporation.

Mr. Battle brings business insight and experience to the Board. He was a business consultant for more than 25 years, has served as a chief executive officer and currently serves on a number of boards. As such, he brings to the Board strategic, operational, financial and corporate governance experience.follows:

 

8


Executive OfficersStockholder Nominees

The Nominating and Governance Committee considers properly submitted stockholder nominations for candidates for membership on the Board as described above under “Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors.” Any stockholder nominations proposed for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for Board membership. In addition, they should be submitted within the time frame as specified under “Stockholder Proposals” above and mailed to: Netflix, Inc., 100 Winchester Circle, Los Gatos, California 95032, Attention: Secretary.

Our bylaws provide a proxy access right for stockholders, pursuant to which a stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, owning at least three percent of outstanding shares of our common stock continuously for at least three years, may nominate and include in our annual meeting proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of (a) two directors or (b) twenty percent of the Board, subject to certain limitations and provided that the stockholders and nominees satisfy the requirements specified in our bylaws.

 

For information about Mr. Hastings, see “Proposal One – Election of Directors.” Our other executive officers are set forth below:

LOGO

Other Executive Officers

Age

     

Position

2021 PROXY STATEMENT    
      19


OUR BOARD EVALUATION PROCESS

Each year, our Board conducts a self-evaluation process to help assure and enhance its performance. This process is overseen by the Nominating and Governance Committee, and involves interviews of each director by our Chief Legal Officer. Feedback is sought primarily in the following areas: (a) the Board’s effectiveness, structure, culture and composition, (b) the quality of and access to information shared with the Board about our business and (c) performance of the directors and quality of Board discussions.

How We Govern

and are Governed

OUR APPROACH TO CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Philosophy

Netflix operates in a dynamic industry and has been in a state of constant innovation since inception. We have redefined how people watch video—first through DVD-by-mail, then streaming video, and now as one of the world’s leading entertainment services with approximately 208 million memberships in 190 countries. Our success has not gone unnoticed, and we are seeing increasing competition, even as this dynamic market continues to evolve.

Our corporate governance structure is built against this backdrop. Governance, in this context, means finding the right balance of rights and responsibilities among stockholders, the Board, and management, and ensuring that there are appropriate checks and balances in place. With the rapid evolution of technology and the changing media landscape, we are continually adjusting our service to meet the dynamic needs and desires of our consumers. Our governance structure is built to help us to do that. Our focus is on creating long-term value for our stockholders, and we have been successful at that – since our initial public offering in 2002, annualized total stockholder return through December 31, 2020 was 40%.

Our governance structure is unconventional. We have several provisions that give our Board and our management team the freedom to be forward-thinking, such as making investments to build our own production studios and developing our own animation capabilities, with the confidence that they will be able to see those investments to fruition. At the same time, we have paid attention to our stockholders and increased our accountability to them by adopting provisions such as proxy access. We are proud of our governance structure, both because of how it has supported our success to date and for being innovative, such as the way that our Board has unfettered access to management and is able to seek information directly from employees all around the enterprise.

We strive to stay in tune with our ownership base. Our Board and our management team engage directly with our stockholders, and our Board and its committees consider stockholders’ feedback in assessing our governance structure, including our compensation program. These discussions provide a good opportunity to share views and answer questions; the input from our stockholders will continue to inform our ongoing evaluation of our structure.

We believe our approach to governance will continue to provide the greatest benefit to Netflix and our stockholders. We realize that elements of our structure may not fit within the standard corporate governance practices and that some stockholders take a different view. But we believe that Netflix’s long-term value is currently best optimized with our approach to governance.

LOGO

Kelly Bennett

20      
    LOGO     


Stockholder Engagement and 2020 Stockholder Proposals

At our 2020 annual meeting, stockholders presented three proposals for vote. One proposal requested additional disclosure around political spending, and the proposal did not receive majority support from stockholders. The second proposal requested that we lower the two-thirds supermajority requirement for amending our charter and bylaws to a simple majority. This proposal did receive majority support from stockholders. The third proposal sought a public report regarding our equal employment opportunity policy, and received less than 1% support from stockholders.

We consider the voting results for stockholders proposals in our Board discussions and as we contemplate our governance structure.

We also engaged with stockholders to solicit feedback on a broad range of topics, including these stockholder proposals. We held 10 virtual meetings in the fall of 2020 with stockholders representing approximately 25% of our common stock outstanding. Members of the Board, accompanied by Company representatives as appropriate, participated in each of these conversations. We also held numerous engagement meetings earlier in 2020, prior to our 2020 annual meeting.

In addition to governance and compensation matters, our discussions in 2020 centered on our approach to environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters; diversity, equity and inclusion; our response to the COVID-19 pandemic; and our dual CEO management structure. Investors expressed a desire to see improved disclosure on environmental and social matters, which the recent hire of our Sustainability Officer is intended to help address. We have also recently increased our disclosure about these topics partly in response to investor feedback by publishing an Inclusion Report in January 2021 along with our EEO-1 and ESG reports.

We also discussed our approach to governance, including our goal of ensuring that we are best able to execute our long-term vision, which we believe is in the best interests of all stockholders. Investors understood our rationale for our governance structure, even if they disagreed with it. While investors inquired about our dual CEO model and how it works for Netflix, none expressed that it was inappropriate for us. We explained that the dual CEO model formalized the prior working relationship between Reed and Ted, and was an effective leadership model to further support our continued growth and international expansion. Stockholders gave us high marks for our response to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as our focus on employee well-being and our efforts to support the creative industry through our establishment of hardship funds.

The feedback on our compensation program was limited, with many investors understanding and supportive of our approach to compensation. While we did not hear thematic concerns about our compensation program during our meetings, one stockholder questioned some components of our compensation program, including the ability of our executives to allocate their compensation between cash and stock options.

We further note that our current practice with respect to our supermajority provision is a mainstream practice. According to data from FactSet, more than forty percent of S&P 500 companies have supermajority provisions in place, and our threshold is common and among the lower thresholds that companies have adopted. After consideration of stockholder feedback, industry trend data, and our corporate governance philosophy, we decided at this point not to lower the voting requirement from its current supermajority level. A simple majority vote requirement already applies to most corporate matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. We believe that in the current dynamic business environment, the supermajority we have in place is appropriate to increase stability in our operations, while still being set low enough for stockholders to have a voice on issues where there is strong consensus. We will continue to monitor and evaluate this issue.

LOGO

46Chief Marketing Officer

Jonathan Friedland

2021 PROXY STATEMENT           59Chief Communications Officer

David Hyman

52General Counsel and Secretary

Jessica Neal

41Chief Talent Officer

Greg Peters

47Chief Product Officer

Ted Sarandos

53Chief Content Officer

David Wells

46Chief Financial Officer21

Kelly Bennett became Netflix’s Chief Marketing Officer in 2012 after nearly a decade at Warner Bros. where he was most recently Vice President Interactive, World Wide Marketing with the pictures group, leading international online campaigns for Warner Bros. movies. Before that, Mr. Bennett ran digital marketing for Warner Bros. Pictures in Europe, the Middle East and Africa and worked in promotion and business development at the company. He previously held executive positions at Dow Jones International and Ignition Media as well as being a partner in online marketing agency Cimex Media. The Canada-born Bennett is a graduate of Simon Fraser University.

Jonathan Friedland joined Netflix in 2011 from The Walt Disney Company, where he was SVP, Corporate Communications. Before that, he spent over 20 years as a foreign correspondent and editor, mainly with The Wall Street Journal, in the U.S., Asia and Latin America andco-founded the Diarios Rumbo chain of Spanish-language newspapers in Texas. Mr. Friedland, who has a MSc. Economics from the London School of Economics and a BA from Hampshire College, was a member of the WSJ team that won the Pulitzer Prize for its coverage of the 9/11 attacks.

David Hyman is General Counsel for Netflix, responsible for all legal and public policy matters for the Company. He has served in this capacity since 2002 and also serves as the Company’s Secretary.

Prior to Netflix, Mr. Hyman was the General Counsel of Webvan, an online internet retailer, having previously held the role of senior corporate counsel. He also practiced law at Morrison & Foerster in San Francisco and Arent Fox in Washington, DC.

Mr. Hyman earned his JD and Bachelor’s degrees from the University of Virginia.

Jessica Nealis a Netflix veteran, starting at the company in 2006 and has been heavily involved in improving the Netflix culture as the company grew.

In 2013 she left to become head of human resources at Coursera, which provides online access to the world’s best university courses, and, later, Chief People Officer at Scopely, a leading player in the mobile gaming industry.

She returned to Netflix in the first half of 2017, at first overseeing HR for the 2000-person product engineering team responsible for continuously improving the Netflix consumer experience before being promoted to her current role.

Ms. Neal also serves on the board of directors of the Association for Talent Development. She holds a B.A. in Fine Art from School of Visual Arts.

9


Greg Peters assumedTHE ROLE OF THE BOARD IN RISK OVERSIGHT

The Board’s role in our risk oversight process includes reviewing and discussing with members of management areas of material risk to the role of Chief Product Officer in July 2017Company, including strategic, operational, financial and leads the product team, which designs, buildslegal risks. The Board as a whole primarily deals with matters related to strategic and optimizes the Netflix experience. Previously, Greg was International Development Officer for Netflix, responsible for the global partnerships with consumer electronics companies, internet service providers and multi-channel video programming distributors that enable Netflix to deliver movies and TV shows across a full range of devices and platforms.

Prior to joining Netflix in 2008, Mr. Peters was senior vice president of consumer electronics products for Macrovision Solutions Corp. (later renamed to Rovi Corporation) and previously held positions at digital entertainment software provider, Mediabolic Inc., Red Hat Network, the provider of Linux and Open Source technology, and online vendor Wine.com. Mr. Peters holds a degree in physics and astronomy from Yale University. Mr. Peters joined the board of 2U, Inc., a global leader in education technology, in March of 2018.

Ted Sarandos has led content acquisition for Netflix since 2000. With more than 20 years’ experience in home entertainment, Mr. Sarandos is recognized in the industry as an innovator in film acquisition and distribution.

Before Netflix, Mr. Sarandos was an executive at video distributor ETD and Video City / West Coast Video.

Mr. Sarandos is a Henry Crown Fellow at the Aspen Institute and serves on the board of Exploringoperational risk. The Arts, anon-profit focused on arts in schools. He also serves on the Film Advisory Board for Tribeca and Los Angeles Film Festival, is an American Cinematheque board member, an Executive Committee Member of the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences, and is a trustee of the American Film Institute.

David Wells has served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer since 2010. His responsibilities include a number of operating duties such as customer service, real estate, and employee technology. Mr. Wells has been at Netflix since March 2004, serving in a variety of roles, most recently as VP of Financial Planning & Analysis. He spent two years, from July 2015 to July 2017, living and performing his global CFO role from the Netherlands as part of building up Netflix’s European operations.

Prior to joining Netflix, Mr. Wells served in progressive roles at Deloitte Consulting from August 1998 to March 2004 and at variousnon-profit organizations before getting his MBA.

Mr. Wells joined the board of The Trade Desk, a public company that provides a technology platform for ad buyers, in January 2016, and serves as Audit Committee Chairdeals with matters of financial and onlegal risk, including cybersecurity risk. The Compensation Committee addresses risks related to compensation and other talent-related matters. The Nominating and Governance Committee manages risks associated with Board independence and corporate governance. Committees report to the Compensation Committee.

Mr. Wells holds an MBAfull Board regarding their respective considerations and MPP from The University of Chicago and a Bachelor’s Degreeactions. Throughout 2020, in Commerce fromresponse to the University of Virginia.

There are no family relationships among anyCOVID-19 pandemic, management, with the support of our directors, nominees for directorBoard and executive officers.Audit Committee, engaged, assessed and led our efforts to mitigate operational, employee and other risks to our business associated with the pandemic.

Board Meetings and CommitteesHow We are Organized

BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES

The Board held eightfive meetings during 2017.2020. Each Board member attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of Board meetings in 2017.

In 2017,and meetings of the Board had fourcommittees.

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board has three standing committees: (1) the Compensation Committee; (2) the Audit Committee; and (3) the Nominating and Governance Committee; and (4) the Stock Option Committee.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

10


Compensation Committee

TheIn 2020, the Compensation Committee of the Board consistsconsisted of fournon-employee directors: Messrs. Battle,Belmer, Döpfner, Haley (Chair), and Hoag and Ms. Sweeney. Ms. Sweeney was appointedMr. Hoag also served on the Compensation Committee until Mr. Döpfner’s appointment to the Compensation Committee in 2017.March 2020. Each member of the Compensation Committee is independent in compliance with the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market as they pertain to Compensation Committee members. Each of the Compensation Committee members is also anon-employee director under Rule16b-3 of the Exchange Act and an outside director under section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves all forms of compensation to be provided to theour executive officers and directors of the Company. The Compensation Committee may not delegate these duties.directors. For a description of the role of the executive officers in recommending compensation and the role of any compensation consultants, please see the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below. The Compensation Committee held threefour meetings in 2017.2020. Each member attended at least 75% of the aggregate ofall the Compensation Committee meetings held in 2017, except for Ms. Sweeney who was absent from the only meeting that was held after her appointment.2020.

The Report of the Compensation Committee is included in this Proxy Statement. In addition, the Board has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, which is available on the Company’sour Investor Relations website athttp:https://ir.netflix.com/governance.cfmir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

Audit CommitteeAUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee of the Board consists of threenon-employee directors: Mr. Barton, and Mses. Kilgore and Mather (Chair). In 2017, Ms. Kilgore replaced Mr. Haley on the Audit Committee. Each member, each of the Audit Committteewhom is independent in compliance with the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market as they pertain to audit committee members. The Board has determined that Ms. Mather is an audit committee financial expert as defined by Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of RegulationS-K of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

LOGO

22          LOGO


The Audit Committee engages the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, reviews the Company’s financial controls, evaluates the scope of the annual audit, reviews audit results, consults with management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm prior to the presentation of financial statements to stockholders and, as appropriate, initiates inquiries into aspects of the Company’s internal accounting controls and financial affairs. The Audit Committee met seven times in 2017.2020. Each member attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the Audit Committee meetings held in 2017 which occurred during their tenure on the Audit Committee, except Mr. Barton who attended at least 71% of such meetings.2020.

The Report of the Audit Committee is included in this Proxy Statement. In addition, the Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which is available on the Company’sour Investor Relations website athttp:https://ir.netflix.com/governance.cfmir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

Nominating and Governance CommitteeNOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board consists of threetwo non-employee directors, Messrs. Barton, Hoag (Chair) and Smith. Mr. Smith was appointed toAmbassador Rice served on the Nominating and Governance Committee in 2017.through her resignation date, January 20, 2021. Each member ofdirector serving on the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews and approves candidates for election and to fill

11


vacancies on the Board, includingre-nominations of members whose terms are due to expire, and reviews and provides guidance to the Board on corporate governance matters. The Nominating and Governance Committee met two times in 2017. Messrs. Barton and Hoag2020. Each member attended all the Nominating and Governance Committee meetings andheld in 2020, other than Mr. Smith waswho did not a member of the Committee at the time of the meetings in 2017.attend one meeting.

The Board has adopted a written charter for the Nominating and Governance Committee, which is available on the Company’s Investor Relationsour investor relations website athttp:https://ir.netflix.com/governance.cfmir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

Stock Option Committee

The Stock Option Committee of the Board consisted of one employee director in 2017: Mr. Hastings. The Stock Option Committee had authority to review and approve the stock options granted to employees, other than to directors or executive officers of the Company pursuant to the Company’s option grant program. The Board has also authorized certain executive officers to review and approve these stock options on behalf of the Stock Option Committee. The Board retained the power to adjust, eliminate or otherwise modify the Company’s option granting practices, any option allocation or portions thereof not previously granted, including without limitation the monthly option formula.

The Stock Option Committee did not hold meetings in 2017. The Stock Option Committee acts pursuant to powers delegated to it by the Board. The Board has not adopted a written charter for the Stock Option Committee. In 2018, the Board dissolved the Stock Option Committee.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

None of the Company’sour executive officers serves on the board of directors or compensation committee of a company that has an executive officer that serves on the Company’sour Board or Compensation Committee. No member of the Company’sour Board is an executive officer of a company in which one of the Company’sour executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of that company.

TheIn 2020, the Compensation Committee consistsconsisted of Messrs. Battle,Belmer, Döpfner (from March 2020), Haley, and Hoag (through March 2020) and Ms. Sweeney, none of whom is currently or was formerly an officer or employee of the Company. None of Messrs. Battle,Belmer, Döpfner, Haley, or Hoag or Ms. Sweeney had a relationship with the Company that required disclosure under Item 404 of RegulationS-K. In addition to Messrs. Battle,Belmer, Döpfner, Haley, and Hoag and Ms. Sweeney, the Company’sour Co-Chief Executive Officer, Reed Hastings, and Chief ExecutiveTalent Officer participated in the executive compensation process for the year ended December 31, 2020 as described below in the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Director IndependencePOLICY REGARDING DIRECTOR ATTENDANCE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Our policy regarding directors’ attendance at the annual meetings of stockholders and their attendance record at last year’s annual meeting of stockholders can be found on our Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

 

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          23


THE BOARD’S LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

The Board combines the role of Chairman and Chief Executive. While the Board reassesses maintaining the combined role from time to time, the Board believes that Mr. Hastings, a Co-Chief Executive Officer, is best situated to serve as Chairman because he is the director most familiar with our business and industry and is therefore best able to identify the strategic priorities to be discussed by the Board. The Board also believes that combining the role of Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer facilitates information flow between management and the Board and fosters strategic development and execution. The Board has appointed Jay Hoag as its lead independent director. As lead independent director, Mr. Hoag’s responsibilities include:

coordinating the activities of the independent directors, and authorization to call meetings of the independent directors;

coordinating with the Co-Chief Executive Officers and corporate secretary to set the agenda for Board meetings, soliciting and taking into account suggestions from other members of the Board;

chairing executive sessions of the independent directors;

providing feedback and perspective to the Co-Chief Executive Officers about discussions among the independent directors;

helping facilitate communication among the Co-Chief Executive Officers and the independent directors;

presiding at Board meetings where the Chair is not present; and

performing other duties assigned from time to time by the Board.

In addition, the Board maintains effective independent oversight through a number of governance practices, including, open and direct communication with management, input on meeting agendas, annual performance evaluations and regular executive sessions.

How to Communicate with Us

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

We provide a process for stockholders to send communications to the Board through the email address board@netflix.com. Information regarding stockholder communications with the Board can be found on the Company’s Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

LOGO

24          LOGO


How We are Paid

Since 2015, none of our directors receive cash for services they provide as directors or members of Board committees but may be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses for attending Board and Board committee meetings. Each non-employee director receives stock options pursuant to the Director Equity Compensation Plan. The Director Equity Compensation Plan provides for a monthly grant of stock options to each non-employee director of the Company in consideration for services provided to us and subject to the terms and conditions of our equity compensation plans.

We believe that for our company, compensating directors only with options is appropriate and creates the right incentives and long-term value alignment with stockholders. Without long-term value creation, directors are not compensated as the intrinsic value of options on dates of grant is zero.

The actual number of options granted each month to each of our directors is determined by the following formula: $25,000 / ([fair market value on the date of grant] x 0.40). Each monthly grant is made on the first trading day of the month, is fully vested upon grant and is exercisable at a strike price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. The table below sets forth information concerning the compensation of our non-employee directors during 2020.

In each of 2018 and 2019, Compensia advised the Board on our compensation program for our Board for the upcoming year, based on a comparison against our peer group’s board compensation programs and other compensation-related developments. The prior time Compensia reviewed our Board’s compensation program was in 2015, and we adjusted our Board’s compensation program in 2016. We have not made any changes to the compensation program for our Board since then.

Name

  

Option Awards

($)(1)

   

Total

($)

 

Richard N. Barton

   376,943        376,943(4) 

Rodolphe Belmer

   377,175        377,175(5) 

Mathias Döpfner

   377,201        377,201(6) 

Timothy M. Haley

   376,943        376,943(7) 

Jay C. Hoag

   376,943        376,943(8) 

Leslie Kilgore

   376,943        376,943(9) 

Strive Masiyiwa(2)

   —         

Ann Mather

   376,943        376,943(10) 

Susan E. Rice(3)

   377,017        377,017(11) 

Bradford L. Smith

   376,943        376,943(12) 

Anne M. Sweeney

   376,943        376,943(13) 

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          25


(1)

Option awards reflect the monthly grant of stock options to each non-employee director on the dates and at the aggregate grant date fair values computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 as shown below. Only options to purchase whole shares are granted with any remaining amount of the grant value carried over to the next monthly grant. The differences in option award values for each of Messrs. Belmer and Döpfner and Ambassador Rice reflect the different carryover amounts relating to the appointment month for each director. For a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation reflected in the Option Awards column, refer to Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on January 28, 2021.

Grant Date

Fair Value
($)

1/2/2020

29,336  

2/3/2020

29,485  

3/2/2020

29,407  

4/1/2020

31,573  

5/1/2020

31,800  

6/1/2020

31,752  

7/1/2020

32,038  

8/3/2020

32,381  

9/1/2020

32,127  

10/1/2020

32,261  

11/2/2020

32,618  

12/1/2020

32,166  

(2)

Mr. Strive Masiyiwa was appointed to the Board on December 16, 2020 and did not receive a prorated grant of stock options.

(3)

Ambassador Susan Rice served on the Board through January 20, 2021.

(4)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Barton at December 31, 2020 was 31,411.

(5)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Belmer at December 31, 2020 was 4,078.

(6)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Döpfner at December 31, 2020 was 4,654.

(7)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Haley at December 31, 2020 was 37,361.

(8)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Hoag at December 31, 2020 was 34,162.

(9)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Kilgore at December 31, 2020 was 11,240.

(10)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Mather at December 31, 2020 was 16,401.

(11)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Rice at December 31, 2020 was 4,426.

(12)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Smith at December 31, 2020 was 23,407.

(13)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Sweeney at December 31, 2020 was 8,240.

LOGO

26          LOGO


Certain Relationships and

Related Transactions

AGREEMENTS WITH DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. These agreements require us to indemnify such individuals, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, for certain liabilities to which they may become subject as a result of their affiliation with us.

PROCEDURES FOR APPROVAL OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

We have a written policy concerning the review and approval of related party transactions. Potential related party transactions are identified through an internal review process that includes a review of payments made in connection with transactions in which related persons may have had a direct or indirect material interest. Those transactions that are determined to be related party transactions under Item 404 of Regulation S-K are submitted for review by the Audit Committee for approval and to conduct a conflicts-of-interest analysis. The individual identified as the “related party” may not participate in any review or analysis of the related party transaction.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          27


Proposal 2

Our Auditors

Ratification of

Appointment of

Independent Registered

Public Accounting Firm

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY

RECOMMENDS THAT THE

STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT

OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS

THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING

FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING

DECEMBER 31, 2021

LOGO

LOGO


The Audit Committee of the Board has selected Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”), an independent registered public accounting firm, to audit the financial statements of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2021. We are submitting its selection of Ernst & Young for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. A representative of Ernst & Young is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions. Ernst & Young has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since March 21, 2012. Neither applicable law nor our bylaws require that stockholders ratify the selection of Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firm. However, we are submitting the selection of Ernst & Young to stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If stockholders do not ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain Ernst & Young. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, at its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the year if they determine that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

During 2020 and 2019, fees for services provided by Ernst & Young was as follows (in thousands):

  

 

  2020   2019 

Audit Fees

  $5,351  $4,936

Audit-Related Fees

   70    

Tax Fees

   2,096   2,927

Total

  $7,517  $7,863

Audit Fees include amounts related to the audit of our annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, and quarterly review of the financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Audit fees also include amounts related to accounting consultations and services rendered in connection with the Company’s issuance of senior notes in 2020 and 2019, respectively, as well as fees for statutory audit filings.

Audit-Related Fees include fees related to assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, including attestation services that are not required by statute or regulation.

Tax Fees include fees billed for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services.

There were no other fees billed by Ernst & Young for services rendered to us, other than the services described above, in 2020 and 2019.

The Audit Committee has determined that eachthe rendering of Messrs. Barton, Battle, Belmer, Haley, Hoagnon-audit services by Ernst & Young was compatible with maintaining their independence.

POLICY ON AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL OF AUDIT AND PERMISSIBLE NON-AUDIT SERVICES OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and Smith,permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax and Mses. Kilgore, Matherother services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year, and Sweeneyany pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent underregistered

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          29


public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval, and the applicable rulesfees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. During 2020, services provided by Ernst & Young were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with this policy.

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of the SEC and the listing standardsmajority of the NASDAQ Stock Market;Votes Cast is required for ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021. The vote is an advisory vote, and therefore every membernot binding.

Netflix Recommendation

LOGO

The Board unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021.

LOGO

30          LOGO


Report of the Audit Committee Compensation

of the Board

The Audit Committee engages and Nominatingsupervises the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and Governanceoversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. Management has the primary responsibility for the preparation of financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 with management, including a discussion of the quality of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments made by management and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Audit Committee reviewed with Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst��& Young”), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, who is responsible for expressing an independent directoropinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in accordancethe United States of America, its judgments as to the quality of the Company’s accounting principles and the other matters required to be discussed with those standards. See “Proceduresthe Audit Committee under the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, including the matters required by Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young its independence from management and the Company, including the written disclosures and the letter regarding its independence as required by PCAOB Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence.

The Audit Committee also reviewed the fees paid to Ernst & Young during the year ended December 31, 2020 for Approvalaudit and non-audit services, which fees are described under the heading “Principal Accountant Fees and Services.” The Audit Committee has determined that the rendering of Related Party Transactions”all non-audit services by Ernst & Young were compatible with maintaining its independence.

The Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young the overall scope and plans for its audit. The Audit Committee met with Ernst & Young, with and without management present, to discuss the results of its examinations, its evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in this Proxy Statementthe annual report on Form 10-K for more information.the year ended December 31, 2020, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Audit Committee of the Board

Richard N. Barton

Leslie Kilgore

Ann Mather

 

12LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          31


LOGO


Consideration of Director NomineesLOGO

OUR COMPANY                     

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS                     

 


Our executive officers as of April 23, 2021 are as follows:

Stockholder Nominees

The Nominating and Governance Committee considers properly submitted stockholder nominations for candidates for membership on the Board as described belowabove under “Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors.” Any stockholder nominations proposed for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for Board membership. In addition, they should be submitted within the time frame as specified under “Stockholder Proposals” above and mailed to: Netflix, Inc., 100 Winchester Circle, Los Gatos, California 95032, Attention: Secretary.

Director Qualifications

In discharging its responsibilitiesOur bylaws provide a proxy access right for stockholders, pursuant to which a stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, owning at least three percent of outstanding shares of our common stock continuously for at least three years, may nominate candidates for electionand include in our annual meeting proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of (a) two directors or (b) twenty percent of the Board, subject to certain limitations and provided that the stockholders and nominees satisfy the requirements specified in our bylaws.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          19


OUR BOARD EVALUATION PROCESS

Each year, our Board conducts a self-evaluation process to help assure and enhance its performance. This process is overseen by the Nominating and Governance Committee, has not specified any minimum qualifications for serving onand involves interviews of each director by our Chief Legal Officer. Feedback is sought primarily in the Board. However,following areas: (a) the NominatingBoard’s effectiveness, structure, culture and Governance Committee endeavorscomposition, (b) the quality of and access to evaluate, propose and approve candidates with business experience, diversity as well as personal skills and knowledge with respect to technology, finance, marketing, financial reporting and any other areas that may be expected to contribute to an effective Board. With respect to diversity, the committee may consider such factors as differences in viewpoint, professional experience, education, skills and other individual qualifications and attributes that contribute to board heterogeneity, including characteristics such as gender, race and national origin.

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors

The Nominating and Governance Committee utilizes a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. Candidates may come to the attention of the Nominating and Governance Committee through management, current Board members, stockholders or other persons. These candidates are evaluated at meetings of the Nominating and Governance Committee as necessary and discussed by the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee from time to time. Candidates may be considered at any point during the year. As described above, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers properly submitted stockholder nominations for candidates for the Board. Following verification of the stockholder status of persons proposing candidates, recommendations are aggregated and considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee. If any materials are provided by a stockholder in connection with the nomination of a director candidate, such materials are forwarded to the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee also reviews materials provided by professional search firms or other parties in connection with a nominee who is not proposed by a stockholder.

Communicationsinformation shared with the Board about our business and (c) performance of the directors and quality of Board discussions.

How We Govern

and are Governed

OUR APPROACH TO CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Philosophy

Netflix operates in a dynamic industry and has been in a state of constant innovation since inception. We have redefined how people watch video—first through DVD-by-mail, then streaming video, and now as one of the world’s leading entertainment services with approximately 208 million memberships in 190 countries. Our success has not gone unnoticed, and we are seeing increasing competition, even as this dynamic market continues to evolve.

Our corporate governance structure is built against this backdrop. Governance, in this context, means finding the right balance of rights and responsibilities among stockholders, the Board, and management, and ensuring that there are appropriate checks and balances in place. With the rapid evolution of technology and the changing media landscape, we are continually adjusting our service to meet the dynamic needs and desires of our consumers. Our governance structure is built to help us to do that. Our focus is on creating long-term value for our stockholders, and we have been successful at that – since our initial public offering in 2002, annualized total stockholder return through December 31, 2020 was 40%.

Our governance structure is unconventional. We have several provisions that give our Board and our management team the freedom to be forward-thinking, such as making investments to build our own production studios and developing our own animation capabilities, with the confidence that they will be able to see those investments to fruition. At the same time, we have paid attention to our stockholders and increased our accountability to them by adopting provisions such as proxy access. We are proud of our governance structure, both because of how it has supported our success to date and for being innovative, such as the way that our Board has unfettered access to management and is able to seek information directly from employees all around the enterprise.

We strive to stay in tune with our ownership base. Our Board and our management team engage directly with our stockholders, and our Board and its committees consider stockholders’ feedback in assessing our governance structure, including our compensation program. These discussions provide a good opportunity to share views and answer questions; the input from our stockholders will continue to inform our ongoing evaluation of our structure.

We believe our approach to governance will continue to provide the greatest benefit to Netflix and our stockholders. We realize that elements of our structure may not fit within the standard corporate governance practices and that some stockholders take a different view. But we believe that Netflix’s long-term value is currently best optimized with our approach to governance.

 

The Company provides a process for stockholders to send communications to the Board. Information regarding stockholder communications with the Board can be found on the Company’s Investor Relations website athttp://ir.netflix.com/governance.cfm.LOGO

13

20          LOGO


Policy Regarding Director Attendance at the Annual MeetingStockholder Engagement and 2020 Stockholder Proposals

The Company’s policy regarding directors’ attendance at the annual meetings of stockholders and their attendance record at last year’sAt our 2020 annual meeting, stockholders presented three proposals for vote. One proposal requested additional disclosure around political spending, and the proposal did not receive majority support from stockholders. The second proposal requested that we lower the two-thirds supermajority requirement for amending our charter and bylaws to a simple majority. This proposal did receive majority support from stockholders. The third proposal sought a public report regarding our equal employment opportunity policy, and received less than 1% support from stockholders.

We consider the voting results for stockholders proposals in our Board discussions and as we contemplate our governance structure.

We also engaged with stockholders to solicit feedback on a broad range of topics, including these stockholder proposals. We held 10 virtual meetings in the fall of 2020 with stockholders can be found on the Company’s Investor Relations website athttp://ir.netflix.com/governance.cfm.

The Rolerepresenting approximately 25% of our common stock outstanding. Members of the Board, accompanied by Company representatives as appropriate, participated in Risk Oversighteach of these conversations. We also held numerous engagement meetings earlier in 2020, prior to our 2020 annual meeting.

In addition to governance and compensation matters, our discussions in 2020 centered on our approach to environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters; diversity, equity and inclusion; our response to the COVID-19 pandemic; and our dual CEO management structure. Investors expressed a desire to see improved disclosure on environmental and social matters, which the recent hire of our Sustainability Officer is intended to help address. We have also recently increased our disclosure about these topics partly in response to investor feedback by publishing an Inclusion Report in January 2021 along with our EEO-1 and ESG reports.

We also discussed our approach to governance, including our goal of ensuring that we are best able to execute our long-term vision, which we believe is in the best interests of all stockholders. Investors understood our rationale for our governance structure, even if they disagreed with it. While investors inquired about our dual CEO model and how it works for Netflix, none expressed that it was inappropriate for us. We explained that the dual CEO model formalized the prior working relationship between Reed and Ted, and was an effective leadership model to further support our continued growth and international expansion. Stockholders gave us high marks for our response to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as our focus on employee well-being and our efforts to support the creative industry through our establishment of hardship funds.

The feedback on our compensation program was limited, with many investors understanding and supportive of our approach to compensation. While we did not hear thematic concerns about our compensation program during our meetings, one stockholder questioned some components of our compensation program, including the ability of our executives to allocate their compensation between cash and stock options.

We further note that our current practice with respect to our supermajority provision is a mainstream practice. According to data from FactSet, more than forty percent of S&P 500 companies have supermajority provisions in place, and our threshold is common and among the lower thresholds that companies have adopted. After consideration of stockholder feedback, industry trend data, and our corporate governance philosophy, we decided at this point not to lower the voting requirement from its current supermajority level. A simple majority vote requirement already applies to most corporate matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. We believe that in the current dynamic business environment, the supermajority we have in place is appropriate to increase stability in our operations, while still being set low enough for stockholders to have a voice on issues where there is strong consensus. We will continue to monitor and evaluate this issue.

 

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          21


THE ROLE OF THE BOARD IN RISK OVERSIGHT

The Board’s role in the Company’sour risk oversight process includes reviewing and discussing with members of management areas of material risk to the Company, including strategic, operational, financial and legal risks. The Board as a whole primarily deals with matters related to strategic and operational risk. The Audit Committee deals with matters of financial and legal risk, including reviewing periodically the Company’s exposure to cybersecurity risk. The Compensation Committee addresses risks related to compensation and other talent-related matters. The Nominating and Governance Committee manages risks associated with Board independence and corporate governance. Committees report to the full Board regarding their respective considerations and actions. Throughout 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, management, with the support of our Board and Audit Committee, engaged, assessed and led our efforts to mitigate operational, employee and other risks to our business associated with the pandemic.

How We are Organized

BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES

The Board’s Leadership StructureBoard held five meetings during 2020. Each Board member attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of Board meetings and meetings of the Board committees.

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board has three standing committees: (1) the Compensation Committee; (2) the Audit Committee; and (3) the Nominating and Governance Committee.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

In 2020, the Compensation Committee of the Board consisted of four non-employee directors: Messrs. Belmer, Döpfner, Haley (Chair), and Ms. Sweeney. Mr. Hoag also served on the Compensation Committee until Mr. Döpfner’s appointment to the Compensation Committee in March 2020. Each member of the Compensation Committee is independent in compliance with the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market as they pertain to Compensation Committee members. Each of the Compensation Committee members is also a non-employee director under Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act and an outside director under section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves all forms of compensation to be provided to our executive officers and directors. For a description of the role of the executive officers in recommending compensation and the role of any compensation consultants, please see the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below. The Compensation Committee held four meetings in 2020. Each member attended all the Compensation Committee meetings held in 2020.

The Report of the Compensation Committee is included in this Proxy Statement. In addition, the Board has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, which is available on our Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee of the Board consists of three non-employee directors: Mr. Barton, and Mses. Kilgore and Mather (Chair), each of whom is independent in compliance with the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market as they pertain to audit committee members. The Board has determined that Ms. Mather is an audit committee financial expert as defined by Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

LOGO

22          LOGO


The Audit Committee engages the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, reviews the Company’s financial controls, evaluates the scope of the annual audit, reviews audit results, consults with management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm prior to the presentation of financial statements to stockholders and, as appropriate, initiates inquiries into aspects of the Company’s internal accounting controls and financial affairs. The Audit Committee met seven times in 2020. Each member attended at least 75% of the Audit Committee meetings held in 2020.

The Report of the Audit Committee is included in this Proxy Statement. In addition, the Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which is available on our Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board consists of two non-employee directors, Messrs. Hoag (Chair) and Smith. Ambassador Rice served on the Nominating and Governance Committee through her resignation date, January 20, 2021. Each director serving on the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews and approves candidates for election and to fill vacancies on the Board, including re-nominations of members whose terms are due to expire, and reviews and provides guidance to the Board on corporate governance matters. The Nominating and Governance Committee met two times in 2020. Each member attended all the Nominating and Governance Committee meetings held in 2020, other than Mr. Smith who did not attend one meeting.

The Board has adopted a written charter for the Nominating and Governance Committee, which is available on our investor relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

None of our executive officers serves on the board of directors or compensation committee of a company that has an executive officer that serves on our Board or Compensation Committee. No member of our Board is an executive officer of a company in which one of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of that company.

In 2020, the Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Belmer, Döpfner (from March 2020), Haley, Hoag (through March 2020) and Ms. Sweeney, none of whom is currently or was formerly an officer or employee of the Company. None of Messrs. Belmer, Döpfner, Haley, or Hoag or Ms. Sweeney had a relationship with the Company that required disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. In addition to Messrs. Belmer, Döpfner, Haley, and Hoag and Ms. Sweeney, our Co-Chief Executive Officer, Reed Hastings, and Chief Talent Officer participated in the executive compensation process for the year ended December 31, 2020 as described below in the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

POLICY REGARDING DIRECTOR ATTENDANCE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Our policy regarding directors’ attendance at the annual meetings of stockholders and their attendance record at last year’s annual meeting of stockholders can be found on our Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          23


THE BOARD’S LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

The Board combines the role of Chairman and Chief Executive. While the Board reassesses maintaining the combined role from time to time, the Board believes that the ChiefMr. Hastings, a Co-Chief Executive Officer, is best situated to serve as Chairman because he is the director most familiar with the Company’sour business and industry and is therefore best able to identify the strategic priorities to be discussed by the Board. The Board also believes that combining the role of Chairman and ChiefCo-Chief Executive Officer facilitates information flow between management and the Board and fosters strategic development and execution. The Board has appointed Jay Hoag as its lead independent director. As lead independent director, Mr. Hoag’s responsibilities include:

 

coordinating the activities of the independent directors, and is authorizedauthorization to call meetings of the independent directors;

 

coordinating with the chief executive officerCo-Chief Executive Officers and corporate secretary to set the agenda for Board meetings, soliciting and taking into account suggestions from other members of the Board;

 

chairing executive sessions of the independent directors;

 

providing feedback and perspective to the chief executive officerCo-Chief Executive Officers about discussions among the independent directors;

 

helping facilitate communication betweenamong the chief executive officerCo-Chief Executive Officers and the independent directors;

 

presiding at Board meetings where the Chair is not present; and

 

14


performing other duties assigned from time to time by the Board.

In addition, the Board maintains effective independent oversight through a number of governance practices, including, open and direct communication with management, input on meeting agendas, annual performance evaluations and regular executive sessions.

How to Communicate with Us

15COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

We provide a process for stockholders to send communications to the Board through the email address board@netflix.com. Information regarding stockholder communications with the Board can be found on the Company’s Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

LOGO

24          LOGO


How We are Paid

Since 2015, none of our directors receive cash for services they provide as directors or members of Board committees but may be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses for attending Board and Board committee meetings. Each non-employee director receives stock options pursuant to the Director Equity Compensation Plan. The Director Equity Compensation Plan provides for a monthly grant of stock options to each non-employee director of the Company in consideration for services provided to us and subject to the terms and conditions of our equity compensation plans.

We believe that for our company, compensating directors only with options is appropriate and creates the right incentives and long-term value alignment with stockholders. Without long-term value creation, directors are not compensated as the intrinsic value of options on dates of grant is zero.

The actual number of options granted each month to each of our directors is determined by the following formula: $25,000 / ([fair market value on the date of grant] x 0.40). Each monthly grant is made on the first trading day of the month, is fully vested upon grant and is exercisable at a strike price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. The table below sets forth information concerning the compensation of our non-employee directors during 2020.

In each of 2018 and 2019, Compensia advised the Board on our compensation program for our Board for the upcoming year, based on a comparison against our peer group’s board compensation programs and other compensation-related developments. The prior time Compensia reviewed our Board’s compensation program was in 2015, and we adjusted our Board’s compensation program in 2016. We have not made any changes to the compensation program for our Board since then.

Name

  

Option Awards

($)(1)

   

Total

($)

 

Richard N. Barton

   376,943        376,943(4) 

Rodolphe Belmer

   377,175        377,175(5) 

Mathias Döpfner

   377,201        377,201(6) 

Timothy M. Haley

   376,943        376,943(7) 

Jay C. Hoag

   376,943        376,943(8) 

Leslie Kilgore

   376,943        376,943(9) 

Strive Masiyiwa(2)

   —         

Ann Mather

   376,943        376,943(10) 

Susan E. Rice(3)

   377,017        377,017(11) 

Bradford L. Smith

   376,943        376,943(12) 

Anne M. Sweeney

   376,943        376,943(13) 

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          25


(1)

Option awards reflect the monthly grant of stock options to each non-employee director on the dates and at the aggregate grant date fair values computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 as shown below. Only options to purchase whole shares are granted with any remaining amount of the grant value carried over to the next monthly grant. The differences in option award values for each of Messrs. Belmer and Döpfner and Ambassador Rice reflect the different carryover amounts relating to the appointment month for each director. For a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation reflected in the Option Awards column, refer to Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on January 28, 2021.

PROPOSAL TWO

Grant Date

  Fair Value
($)

1/2/2020

29,336  

2/3/2020

29,485  

3/2/2020

29,407  

4/1/2020

31,573  

5/1/2020

31,800  

6/1/2020

31,752  

7/1/2020

32,038  

8/3/2020

32,381  

9/1/2020

32,127  

10/1/2020

32,261  

11/2/2020

32,618  

12/1/2020

32,166  

(2)

Mr. Strive Masiyiwa was appointed to the Board on December 16, 2020 and did not receive a prorated grant of stock options.

(3)

Ambassador Susan Rice served on the Board through January 20, 2021.

(4)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Barton at December 31, 2020 was 31,411.

(5)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Belmer at December 31, 2020 was 4,078.

(6)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Döpfner at December 31, 2020 was 4,654.

(7)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Haley at December 31, 2020 was 37,361.

(8)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Hoag at December 31, 2020 was 34,162.

(9)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Kilgore at December 31, 2020 was 11,240.

(10)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Mather at December 31, 2020 was 16,401.

(11)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Rice at December 31, 2020 was 4,426.

(12)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Smith at December 31, 2020 was 23,407.

(13)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Sweeney at December 31, 2020 was 8,240.

LOGO

26          LOGO


Certain Relationships and

Related Transactions

AGREEMENTS WITH DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. These agreements require us to indemnify such individuals, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, for certain liabilities to which they may become subject as a result of their affiliation with us.

PROCEDURES FOR APPROVAL OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

We have a written policy concerning the review and approval of related party transactions. Potential related party transactions are identified through an internal review process that includes a review of payments made in connection with transactions in which related persons may have had a direct or indirect material interest. Those transactions that are determined to be related party transactions under Item 404 of Regulation S-K are submitted for review by the Audit Committee for approval and to conduct a conflicts-of-interest analysis. The individual identified as the “related party” may not participate in any review or analysis of the related party transaction.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          27


Proposal 2

Our Auditors

Ratification of

Appointment of

Independent Registered

Public Accounting Firm

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY

RECOMMENDS THAT THE

STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT

OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS

THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING

FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING

DECEMBER 31, 2021

LOGO

LOGO


The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has selected Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”), an independent registered public accounting firm, to audit the financial statements of Netflix, Inc.the Company for the year ending December 31, 2018. The Company is2021. We are submitting its selection of Ernst & Young for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. A representative of Ernst & Young is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions. Ernst & Young has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since March 21, 2012. Neither applicable law nor the Company’s Bylawsour bylaws require that stockholders ratify the selection of Ernst & Young as the Company’sour independent registered public accounting firm. However, the Company iswe are submitting the selection of Ernst & Young to stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If stockholders do not ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain Ernst & Young. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, at its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the year if they determine that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and itsour stockholders.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

During 20172020 and 2016,2019, fees for services provided by Ernst & Young was as follows (in thousands):

 

  2020   2019 

 2017 2016 

Audit Fees

 $              3,957   $              3,123    $5,351  $4,936

Audit-Related Fees

   70    

Tax Fees

 1,275   1,791     2,096   2,927

 

 

  

 

 

Total

 $5,232   $4,914    $7,517  $7,863

 

 

  

 

 

Audit Feesinclude amounts related to the audit of the Company’sour annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, and quarterly review of the financial statements included in the Company’sour Quarterly Reports onForm 10-Q. Audit fees also include amounts related to accounting consultations and services rendered in connection with the Company’s issuance of senior notes in 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively, as well as fees for statutory audit filings.

Audit-Related Fees include fees related to assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, including attestation services that are not required by statute or regulation.

Tax Fees include fees billed for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services.

There were no other fees billed by Ernst & Young for services rendered to the Company, other than the services described above, in 2017 and 2016.Required Vote

The Audit Committee has determined thatfour nominees receiving the renderinghighest number ofnon-audit services by Ernst & Young was compatible with maintaining their independence. affirmative Votes Cast will each be elected as Class I directors.

Netflix Recommendation

 

LOGO


The Board unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote “FOR” the nominees listed above.

16

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          9


Policy on Audit CommitteeWho We Are

BOARD OVERVIEW

Our Board is composed of 12 highly experienced, talented, and qualified directors with experience as board members and executives at some of the world’s most successful companies. We believe that the Board is well situated to navigate the changing competitive terrain that Netflix operates within. The Board has led Netflix through its evolution from a US Pre-ApprovalDVD-by-mail company to a global streaming company to one of Auditthe leading entertainment companies in the world, while effectively managing risk and PermissibleNon-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firmoverseeing management performance. By successfully navigating this evolution, our annualized total stockholder return since our initial public offering in 2002 through December 31, 2020 was 40%.

LOGO

Board Tenure

LOGO

Gender Diversity

Board balances fresh thinking, new perspectives, and emerging skill needs with institutional knowledge and stability

A quarter of directors are women.

LOGOLOGO

 

The Audit Committeepre-approves all audit and permissiblenon-audit services provided by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax and other services.Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year, and anypre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with thispre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may alsopre-approve particular services on acase-by-case basis. During 2017, services provided by Ernst & Young werepre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with this policy.

Required VoteLOGO

 

The affirmative vote of the majority of the Votes Cast is requiredLOGO

10          LOGO


OUR DIRECTORS

Directors standing for ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018. The vote is an advisory vote, and therefore not binding.

Netflix Recommendationelection:

 

LOGO

RICHARD BARTON

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2002 CLASS: I AGE: 53

COMMITTEES: AUDIT

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Having founded successful internet-based companies (including Zillow, Expedia and GlassDoor), Mr. Barton provides strategic and technical insight to the Board. In addition, Mr. Barton brings experience with respect to marketing products to consumers through the internet.

Also...

Mr. Barton was a venture partner at Benchmark, a venture capital firm that has been an early-stage investor in companies like Twitter, Instagram, Uber and Zillow, from 2005 until 2018. He has served on many public company boards. Mr. Barton holds a B.S. in general engineering: industrial economics from Stanford University.

Career Snapshot:

•  Chief Executive and co-founder of Zillow-Group (since 2010)

•  Co-founder and Chairman of GlassDoor (2007-2018)

•  Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Expedia (1996-2003)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Qurate (formerly Liberty Interactive)

•  Zillow Group

•  Altimeter Growth Corp.

•  Altimeter Growth Corp. 2

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2018.

LOGO

RODOLPHE BELMER

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2018 CLASS: I AGE: 51

COMMITTEES: COMPENSATION

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

As a media executive located in France, Mr. Belmer brings a unique international perspective to the Board. In addition, his media experience and business acumen provide the Board with valuable insight as it expands its global operations.

Also...

Mr. Belmer began his career in the marketing department of Procter & Gamble France before joining McKinsey in 1998. He is a graduate of France’s HEC business school.

Career Snapshot:

•  CEO and director of Eutelsat, the leading satellite operator in Europe, the Middle East and Africa (since 2016)

•  CEO of Canal + Group (2012-2015); various additional roles since joining in 2001

Other Public Company Boards

•  None

 

17LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          11


PROPOSAL THREELOGO ADVISORY APPROVAL OF

BRAD SMITH

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2015 CLASS: I AGE: 62

COMMITTEES: NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

With a leading role at Microsoft, Mr. Smith brings broad business and international experience on a variety of issues, including government affairs and public policy to the Board. Mr. Smith also brings experience playing a key role in representing Microsoft externally and in leading Microsoft’s work on a number of critical issues, including privacy, security, accessibility, environmental sustainability and digital inclusion, among others, which provides additional expertise to the Board.

Also...

Mr. Smith has led a push for diversity within Microsoft’s legal division, advocating for increasing employment of diverse employees at the company and associated law firms. Mr. Smith holds a B.A. in international relations and economics from Princeton, a J.D. from Columbia University School of Law and also studied international law and economics at the Graduate Institute of International Studies in Geneva.

Career Snapshot:

•  President and Chief Legal Officer of Microsoft (since 2015); he originally joined Microsoft in 1993

•  Associate and then Partner, Covington & Burling (1986-1993)

Other Public Company Boards

•  None

LOGO

ANNE SWEENEY

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2015 CLASS: I AGE: 63

COMMITTEES: COMPENSATION

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Ms. Sweeney has held various senior positions with large entertainment companies, which provided her with broad strategic and operational experience. Her experience in the entertainment industry provides a unique business perspective to the Board as Netflix builds its global internet TV network.

Also...

Ms. Sweeney’s entertainment experience spans more than three decades, including her oversight of Disney’s cable, broadcast and satellite properties globally for 18 years. During that time, she was charged with launching and running over 118 Disney Channels in 164 countries in 34 languages, and had oversight over various ABC properties including ABC Television Network, ABC Studios and the Disney ABC Cable Networks Group. Prior to Disney, she was CEO of FX Networks, Inc. from 1993 to 1996 and spent more than 12 years at Viacom’s Nickelodeon Network. She holds an Ed. M. From Harvard University and a B.A. from the College of New Rochelle.

Career Snapshot:

•  Co-chair of Disney Media Networks and President of Disney/ABC Television Group (1996-2015)

•  Chairman and CEO of FX Networks, part of the Fox Entertainment Group/21st Century Fox (1993-1996)

Other Public Company Boards

•  None

LOGO

12          LOGO


Directors not standing for election:

LOGO

REED HASTINGS

CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATIONAND PRESIDENT OF THE COMPANY, AND CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

DIRECTOR AND CHAIRMAN SINCE: 1997 CLASS: III (EXPIRES 2023) AGE: 60
COMMITTEES: NONE

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Mr. Hastings, as co-founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer, deeply understands the technology and business of Netflix and brings strategic and operational insight to the Board. He is also a software engineer, holds an MSCS in Artificial Intelligence from Stanford University, and has unique management and industry insights.

Also...

Mr. Hastings is an active educational philanthropist: he served on the California State Board of education from 2000 to 2004, and after receiving his B.A. from Bowdoin College in 1983 served in the Peace Corps as a high school math teacher in Swaziland. Mr. Hastings previously served on the board of Facebook, Inc. from 2011-2019.

Career Snapshot:

•  Founder, Co-Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of Netflix (since 1997)

•  Founder, Pure Software (1991) through IPO (1995) and ultimate sale to Rational Software

Other Public Company Boards

•  None

As required by section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), we are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to cast anon-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC (also referred to as“say-on-pay”).

As described in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we have adopted an executive compensation philosophy designed to attract and retain outstanding performers. The Company’s compensation practices are guided by market rates and tailored to account for the specific needs and responsibilities of the particular position as well as the performance and unique qualifications of the individual employee, rather than by seniority or overall Company performance.

Required Vote
LOGO

JAY C. HOAG

LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 1999 CLASS: III (EXPIRES 2023) AGE: 62

COMMITTEES: NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE (CHAIR)

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

As a venture capital investor, Mr. Hoag brings strategic insights and financial experience to the Board. He has evaluated, invested in and served as a board member on numerous companies, both public and private, and is familiar with a full range of corporate and board functions. His many years of experience in helping companies shape and implement strategy provide the Board with unique perspectives on matters such as risk management, corporate governance, talent selection and management.

Also...

Mr. Hoag has been a technology investor and venture capitalist for more than 38 years, involved in a large number of technology investments including Altiris (acquired by Symantec), CNET, Expedia, Facebook, Fandango (acquired by Comcast), Intuit, and Sybase. Mr. Hoag is on the Investment Advisory Committee at the University of Michigan, the Board of Trustees of Northwestern University, and the Board of Trust at Vanderbilt University. Previously, Mr. Hoag has served on the board of directors of numerous other public and private companies, including TechTarget, Inc. from 2004-2016. Mr. Hoag holds an M.B.A. from the University of Michigan and a B.A. from Northwestern University.

Career Snapshot:

•  Founding General Partner at TCV (Technology Crossover Ventures), a venture capital firm (since 1995)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Electronic Arts

•  Peloton Interactive

•  TCV Acquisition Corp.

•  TripAdvisor

•  Zillow Group

 

The affirmative vote of the majority of the Votes Cast is required to approve the compensation of our named executive officers disclosed in this Proxy Statement. The vote is an advisory vote, and therefore not binding.LOGO

Netflix Recommendation

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

18

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          13


PROPOSAL FOURLOGO STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING

MATHIAS DÖPFNER

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2018 CLASS: III (EXPIRES 2023) AGE: 58

COMMITTEES: COMPENSATION

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

As a media executive located in Germany, Mr. Döpfner brings international perspective, media experience and business acumen to the Board.

Also...

Mr. Döpfner has extensive experience in media and digital transformation and a strong track record of increasing revenues related to digital activities. He previously served on the boards of Vodafone Group plc (2015-2018) and Time Warner Inc. (2006-2018). Additionally, his relationships and honorary offices at entities including the American Academy, the American Jewish Committee and the European Publishers Council among many others provide him with relevant insight and perspective in international media. He studied Musicology, German and Theatrical Arts in Frankfurt and Boston.

Career Snapshot:

•  Chairman and CEO, Axel Springer SE, Europe’s leading digital publishing house (since 2002)

•  His former roles at Axel Springer SE include editor-in-chief of Die Welt (1998-2000) and as a member of the Management Board (starting in 2000)

•  Visiting Professor in media at University of Cambridge, St. John’s College (2010)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Warner Music Group

In accordance with SEC rules, we have set forth below a stockholder proposal, along with the supporting statement of the stockholder proponent, for which we and our Board accept no responsibility. The stockholder proposal is required to be voted upon at our Annual Meeting only if properly presented at our Annual Meeting. As explained below, our Board unanimously recommends that you vote “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal.

Myra K. Young, 9295 Yorkship Court, Elk Grove, CA 95758, the beneficial owner of no less than 700 shares of the Company’s common stock on the date the proposal was submitted, has notified the Company of her intent to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting.

RESOLVED: The shareholders of Netflix Inc. (‘Netflix’ or ‘Company’) hereby request that the Board of Directors take the steps necessary to amend our bylaws and each appropriate governing document to give holders with an aggregate of 15% net long of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareowner meeting. This proposal does not impact our board’s current power to call a special meeting.

Supporting Statement
LOGO

TIMOTHY HALEY

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 1998 CLASS: II (EXPIRES 2022) AGE: 66
COMMITTEES: COMPENSATION (CHAIR)

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

As a venture capital investor, Mr. Haley brings strategic and financial experience to the Board. He has evaluated, invested in and served as a board member on numerous companies. His executive recruiting background also provides the Board with insight into talent selection and management.

Also...

Mr. Haley was President of Haley Associates, an executive recruiting firm serving the high technology industry from 1986 - 1998, and serves on the boards of several private companies. Mr. Haley holds a B.A. from Santa Clara University.

Career Snapshot:

•  Managing Director, Redpoint Ventures, a venture capital firm (since 1999)

•  Managing Director, Institutional Venture Partners, a venture capital firm (since 1998)

Other Public Company Boards

•  2U, Inc.

•  ThredUp

•  Zuora

 

Delaware law allows 10% of company shares to call a special meeting. A shareholder right to call a special meeting is a way to bring an important matter to the attention of both management and shareholders outside the annual meeting cycle. This is important because there could be15-months between annual meetings.LOGO

A shareholder right to act by written consent and to call a special meeting are two complimentary[sic] ways to bring an important matter to the attention of both management and shareholders outside the annual meeting cycle. Both are associated with increased governance quality and shareholder value. Our Company makes no provisions for either right.

Currently, 64% of S&P 500 companies have adopted company bylaws, articles of incorporation, or charter provisions to allow shareholders to call a special meeting. Even more than half of all S&P 1500 companies allow shareholders this right.

This proposal topic also won majority votes last year at Salesforce.com, NETGEAR, and United Rentals. It may be possible to adopt this proposal by simply incorporating this text into our governing documents:

“Special meetings of the stockholders, for any purpose or purposes, unless otherwise prescribed by statute, may be called by the Chairman of the Board or the President, and shall be called by the Chairman of the Board or President or Secretary upon the order in writing of a majority of or by resolution of the Board of Directors, or at the request in writing of stockholders owning 15% net long of the entire capital stock of the Corporation issued and outstanding and entitled to vote.”

19


This proposal should be seen in the context that in 2017 a majority of shares voted to declassify the board, move to a majority vote standard for elect directors in uncontested elections and eliminate supermajority standards. To date, Netflix has failed to adoptanyof those initiatives.

We urge the Board to join the mainstream of major U.S. companies and establish a right for shareholders owning 15% of our outstanding common sock[sic] to call a special meeting.

Please vote for: Special Shareowner Meetings - Proposal 4

Netflix Opposing Statement

The Board has considered the stockholder proposal and, for the reasons described below, believes that the proposal is not in the best interests of Netflix and our stockholders.

The Board believes that maintaining the Company’s current requirements for calling special meetings is in the best interest of its stockholders. Each of the Company’s directors has a fiduciary duty to represent all stockholders when determining whether a matter is so pressing that it must be addressed at a special meeting. In contrast, stockholders do not have any fiduciary obligations to the Company or other stockholders. The foregoing proposal would permit a small group of stockholders who have a special interest to use the right to call a special meeting to serve their narrow self-interests that are not shared by the Company’s stockholders generally. With the Company’s current special meeting requirements, stockholders nonetheless have significant protections under state law, other regulations and the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws as stockholder approval is already required for a variety of fundamental corporate decisions, such as a merger or sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets or for issuing shares above a prescribed threshold. Lastly, it should be noted that for a company with as many stockholders as the Company, a special meeting of stockholders is a very expensive and time-consuming affair because of the legal costs in preparing required disclosure documents, printing and mailing costs, and the time commitment required of the Board and members of senior management to prepare for and conduct the meeting.

For the foregoing reasons, the Board unanimously believes that this proposal is not in the best interests of Netflix or our stockholders, and recommends that you vote “AGAINST” Proposal Four.

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of the majority of the Votes Cast is required to approve the stockholder proposal. The proposal is precatory and, accordingly, is not binding on the Board or the Company.

Netflix Recommendation

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “AGAINST” THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR A SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING.

20

14          LOGO


PROPOSAL FIVELOGO STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR PROXY ACCESS

LESLIE KILGORE

DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2012 (INDEPENDENT SINCE 2015) CLASS: II (EXPIRES 2022) AGE: 55
COMMITTEES: AUDIT

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Ms. Kilgore’s experience as a marketing executive with internet retailers and consumer product companies provides a unique business perspective and her numerous managerial positions provide strategic and operational experience to the Board.

Also...

As our former Chief Marketing Officer, Ms. Kilgore deeply understands the Netflix business and is able to bring years of marketing experience to the Board. She holds an M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business and a B.S. from The Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania. She previously served on the board of LinkedIn Corp., and she currently serves on the boards of several other companies.

Career Snapshot:

•  Chief Marketing Officer of Netflix (2000-2012)

•  Director of Marketing at Amazon (1999-2000)

•  Brand manager at The Procter & Gamble Company (1992-1999)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Medallia

•  Pinterest

In accordance with SEC rules, we have set forth below a stockholder proposal, along with the supporting statement of the stockholder proponent, for which we and our Board accept no responsibility. The stockholder proposal is required to be voted upon at our Annual Meeting only if properly presented at our Annual Meeting. As explained below, our Board unanimously recommends that you vote “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal.

The New York City Employees’ Retirement System, the New York City Fire Pension Fund, the New York City Teachers’ Retirement System, and the New York City Police Pension Fund and the New York City Board of Education Retirement System (the “Systems”), Municipal Building, One Centre Street, 8th Floor North, New York, N.Y. 10007-2341, the beneficial owners of an aggregate of 684,401 shares of the Company’s common stock on the date the proposal was submitted, has notified the Company of its intent to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting.

The proposal isco-sponsored by the Connecticut Retirement Plans Trust Funds, the beneficial owner of shares of the Company’s common stock with a market value greater than $2,000.00 on the date the proposal was submitted.

RESOLVED: Shareholders of the Netflix, Inc. (the “Company”) ask the board of directors (the “Board”) to take the steps necessary to adopt a “proxy access” bylaw. Such a bylaw shall require the Company to include in proxy materials prepared for a shareholder meeting at which directors are to be elected the name, Disclosure and Statement (as defined herein) of any person nominated for election to the board by a shareholder or group (the “Nominator”) that meets the criteria established below. The Company shall allow shareholders to vote on such nominee on the Company’s proxy card.

The number of shareholder-nominated candidates appearing in proxy materials shall not exceed the larger of two or one quarter of the directors then serving. This bylaw, which shall supplement existing rights under Company bylaws, should provide that a Nominator must:

 

a.have beneficially owned 3% or more
LOGO

STRIVE MASIYIWA

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2020 CLASS: II (EXPIRES 2022) AGE: 60

COMMITTEES: NONE

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

As the Chairman and founder of Econet Global, a telecommunications and technology group with operations and investments in 29 countries in Africa and Europe, Mr. Masiyiwa provides a unique international perspective to the Board. In addition, his experience in building businesses across Africa and the world provides the Company with valuable insight as it expands globally.

Also...

Mr. Masiyiwa serves on several international boards including Unilever Plc, National Geographic Society, Asia Society, and the Global Advisory boards of Bank of America, the Council on Foreign Relations (in the US), Stanford University, and the Prince of Wales Trust for Africa, and is a longstanding board member of the Company’s outstanding common stock continuouslyUnited States Holocaust Museum’s Committee on Conscience. A former board member of the Rockefeller Foundation for 15 years, he is Chairman Emeritus of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) and African Union Special Envoy to the continent’s COVID response. He received a BSc in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the University of Wales. Mr. Masiyiwa has received honorary doctorates from Morehouse College, Yale University, Nelson Mandela University and Cardiff University.

Career Snapshot:

•  Founder and Executive Chairman of Econet Global (1993-Present)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Unilever Plc

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          15


LOGO

ANN MATHER

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2010 CLASS: II (EXPIRES 2022) AGE: 61

COMMITTEES: AUDIT (CHAIR, FINANCIAL EXPERT)

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Ms. Mather’s experience as an executive with several major media companies provides a unique business perspective. As a former CFO and senior finance executive at least threemajor corporations, she brings more than 20 years before submittingof financial and accounting expertise to the nomination;Board. Additionally, Ms. Mather’s numerous managerial positions and service on public company boards provides strategic, operational and corporate governance experience.

Also...

Ms. Mather previously served on the board of Shutterfly, Inc., a photography and image-sharing company (2013-2019) and Glu Mobile Inc., a publisher of mobile games (2005-2021). She has also been an independent trustee to the board of trustees of Dodge & Cox Funds, a mutual fund, since May 2011. She received her M.A. from Cambridge University, and is an Honorary Fellow of Sidney Sussex College Cambridge.

Career Snapshot:

•  Executive Vice President and CFO of Pixar (1999 - 2004)

•  Executive Vice President and CFO of Village Roadshow Pictures (1999)

•  Various executive positions at The Walt Disney Company (1993-1999)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Alphabet (formerly Google)

•  Airbnb

•  Bumble

•  Arista Networks

 

b.give
LOGO

TED SARANDOS

CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF CONTENT OFFICER OF THE COMPANY

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2020 CLASS: III (EXPIRES 2023) AGE: 56

COMMITTEES: NONE

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Mr. Sarandos, as Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Content Officer, is integral to developing corporate strategy and oversees the Company, withinteams responsible for the time period identifiedacquisition, creation and promotion of all Netflix content including original series from around the world. His in-depth knowledge about Netflix and experience in its bylaws, written noticethe entertainment industry provide a unique business perspective to the Board.

Also...

Mr. Sarandos has been responsible for all content operations since 2000, and led the Company’s transition into original content production that began in 2013 with the launch of series such as House of Cards, Arrested Development and Orange is the New Black. With more than 20 years’ experience in home entertainment, he is recognized in the industry as an innovator in film acquisition and distribution and was named one of Time Magazine’s 100 Most Influential People of 2013. He is a Henry Crown Fellow at the Aspen Institute and serves on the board of Exploring The Arts, a nonprofit focused on arts in schools. Mr. Sarandos also serves on the Film Advisory Board for the Tribeca and Los Angeles Film Festivals, is an American Cinematheque board member, an Executive Committee Member of the information required byAcademy of Television Arts & Sciences and is a trustee of the bylawsAmerican Film Institute.

Career Snapshot:

•  Co-Chief Executive Officer (since July 2020) and any SecuritiesChief Content Officer of Netflix (since 2000)

•  Executive at video distributor ETD and Exchange Commission rules about (i)Video City/West Coast video, a video rental retail chain

•  Producer/Executive Producer for award-winning and critically acclaimed documentaries and independent films including the nominee, including consent to being named in the proxy materialsEmmy-nominated Outrage and to serving as director if elected; and (ii) the Nominator, including proof it owns the required shares (the “Disclosure”); andTony Bennett: The Music Never Ends.

Other Public Company Boards

•  Spotify

 

LOGO

16       c.    LOGOcertify that (i) it will assume liability stemming from any legal or regulatory violation arising out of the Nominator’s communications with the Company shareholders, including the Disclosure and Statement; (ii) it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations if it uses soliciting material other than the Company’s proxy materials; and (iii) to the best of its knowledge, the required shares were acquired in the ordinary course of business and not to change or influence control at the Company.

The Nominator may submit with the Disclosure a statement not exceeding 500 words in support of each nominee (the “Statement”). The Board shall adopt procedures for promptly resolving disputes

21


over whether noticeBOARD SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE

Our Board believes that having a diverse mix of directors with complementary skills, experience, and expertise is important to meeting its oversight responsibility. That diversity, combined with transparent and broad access to information and exposure to management beyond the executive officers, allows the Board to exercise effective management oversight and to ensure the care of our stockholders’ interests. Below are a nomination was timely, whether the Disclosure and Statement satisfy the bylaw and applicable federal regulations, and the prioritynumber of skills that our Board members bring to be givenNetflix. If an individual is not listed under a particular attribute, it does not signify a director’s lack of ability to multiple nominations exceeding theone-quarter limit.

Supporting Statementcontribute in such area.

 

We believe proxy access will make directors more accountable and enhance shareholder value. A 2014 study by the CFA Institute concluded that proxy access could raise overall US market capitalization by up to $140.3 billion if adopted market-wide, “with little cost or disruption.” (http://www.cfapubs.org/doi/pdf/10.2469/ccb.v2014.n9.1)

The proposed terms are similar to those in vacated SEC Rule14a-11 (https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2010/33-9136.pdf). The SEC, following extensive analysis and input from market participants, determined that those terms struck the proper balance of providing shareholders with viable proxy access while containing appropriate safeguards.

The proposed terms enjoy strong investor support and company acceptance. A similar shareholder proposal received at least 66.8% of votes cast at the Company in 2017 and more than 440 companies have enacted bylaws with similar terms.

We urge shareholders to vote FOR this proposal.

Netflix Opposing Statement

LOGO  

Leadership

 

Experience and expertise in identifying and developing opportunities for long-term value creation, including experience in driving innovation, opening markets, improving operations, identifying risks, and executing successfully.

Richard Barton

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Timothy Haley

Reed Hastings

Jay Hoag

Leslie Kilgore

Strive Masiyiwa

Ann Mather

Brad Smith

Ted Sarandos

Anne Sweeney

LOGO  

Strategy

Experience and expertise in identifying and developing opportunities for long-term value creation, including experience in driving innovation, opening markets, improving operations, identifying risks, and executing successfully.

Richard Barton

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Timothy Haley

Reed Hastings

Jay Hoag

Leslie Kilgore

Strive Masiyiwa

Ann Mather

Ted Sarandos

Brad Smith

Anne Sweeney

LOGO  

Finance & Accounting

Management or oversight of the finance function of an enterprise, resulting in proficiency in complex financial management, capital allocation, and financial reporting processes.

Richard Barton

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Timothy Haley

Reed Hastings

Jay Hoag

Leslie Kilgore

Ann Mather

Anne Sweeney

LOGO  

Entertainment & Media

Experience and expertise with the entertainment and media industry, resulting in a deep understanding of consumer expectations and innovations in content and delivery.

Richard Barton

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Reed Hastings

Leslie Kilgore

Ann Mather

Ted Sarandos

Anne Sweeney

LOGO  

Demographic Diversity

Representation of gender, ethnic, race, geographic, cultural, or other perspectives that expand the Board’s understanding of the needs and viewpoints of our members, partners, employees, governments, and other stakeholders worldwide.

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Leslie Kilgore

Strive Masiyiwa

Ann Mather

Anne Sweeney

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          17


LOGO  

Global Business & Government Relations

Expertise in global business cultures, consumer preferences, and /or government relations gained through local experience in international markets or senior positions overseeing public policy.

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Strive Masiyiwa

Ann Mather

Brad Smith

LOGO  

Technology

Experience and expertise in technology-related business or technology functions, resulting in knowledge of how to anticipate technological trends, understand and manage technology related risks, generate disruptive innovation, and extend or create new business models.

Richard Barton

Reed Hastings

Jay Hoag

Strive Masiyiwa

Brad Smith

LOGO  

Marketing

Experience and expertise developing strategies to grow market share, package and position product offerings, build brand awareness and equity, and enhance enterprise reputation.

Richard Barton

Rodolphe Belmer

Leslie Kilgore

Ted Sarandos

LOGO  

Human Capital Management

Experience and expertise related to human resource issues such as attracting and retaining talent, succession planning, engagement of employees, and the development and evolution of culture, including the alignment of culture and long-term strategy.

Timothy Haley

Reed Hastings

Ted Sarandos

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The Board has considereddetermined that each of Messrs. Barton, Belmer, Döpfner, Haley, Hoag, Masiyiwa and Smith, and Mses. Kilgore, Mather, and Sweeney are independent under the stockholder proposalapplicable rules of the SEC and for the reasons described below, believes thatlisting standards of the proposal is not inNASDAQ Stock Market; therefore, every member of the best interests of NetflixAudit Committee, Compensation Committee and our stockholders.

The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for evaluating, proposingan independent director in accordance with those standards. In addition, the Board determined that Ambassador Rice was independent during the time she served on the Board.

LOGO

18          LOGO


How We are Selected,

Elected and approving nomineesEvaluated

CONSIDERATION OF DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Director Qualifications

In discharging its responsibilities to nominate candidates for election to the Company’s Board, of Directors. In undertaking this responsibility, the committee has a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of all stockholders. Stockholders who would be provided with access to the Company’s proxy via a proxy access bylaw do not have a similar fiduciary duty. These stockholders could nominate directors who advance their own specific agenda without regard to the best interest of the Company and its stockholders or to the overall composition of the Board, including independence, expertise and diversity considerations. In determining director nominees, the Nominating and Governance Committee takes into considerationhas not specified any minimum qualifications for serving on the Board. However, the Nominating and Governance Committee endeavors to evaluate, propose and approve candidates with business experience, diversity, as well as personal skills and knowledge with respect to technology, finance, marketing, financial reporting and any other areas that may be expected to contribute to an effective Board. With respect to diversity, the committee may consider such factors as diversity in viewpoint, professional experience, education, international experience, skills and other individual qualifications and attributes that contribute to board heterogeneity, including characteristics such as gender, race, and national origin.

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors

The Board believes thatNominating and Governance Committee utilizes a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. Candidates may come to the attention of the Nominating and Governance Committee is inthrough management, current Board members, stockholders or other persons. These candidates are evaluated at meetings of the best positionNominating and Governance Committee as necessary and discussed by the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee from time to evaluatetime. Candidates may be considered at any point during the year.

The Nominating and propose director nominees and that providing access to the Company’s proxy forGovernance Committee considers properly submitted stockholder nominations not nominatedfor candidates for the Board. Following verification of the stockholder status of persons proposing candidates, recommendations are aggregated and considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee. If any materials are provided by a stockholder in connection with the nomination of a director candidate, such materials are forwarded to the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee will underminealso reviews materials provided by professional search firms or other parties in connection with a nominee who is not proposed by a stockholder.

Stockholder Nominees

The Nominating and Governance Committee considers properly submitted stockholder nominations for candidates for membership on the value to stockholders of this selectionBoard as described above under “Identifying and nomination process. Stockholders already have the opportunity to recommend director candidatesEvaluating Nominees for Directors.” Any stockholder nominations proposed for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee. Furthermore, ourCommittee should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for Board membership. In addition, they should be submitted within the time frame as specified under “Stockholder Proposals” above and mailed to: Netflix, Inc., 100 Winchester Circle, Los Gatos, California 95032, Attention: Secretary.

Our bylaws also provide the opportunitya proxy access right for stockholders, pursuant to which a stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, owning at least three percent of outstanding shares of our common stock continuously for at least three years, may nominate and include in our annual meeting proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of (a) two directors for consideration at annual meetingsor (b) twenty percent of the Board, subject to certain limitations and provided that the stockholders and to solicit proxiesnominees satisfy the requirements specified in favor of such nominees.

In addition, the Board believes that the proxy access proposal espoused by the proponents could be detrimental to the Company for a number of other reasons, including the increased distraction causedour bylaws.

 

22LOGO


to management and the Board from proxy contests, the short-term or special interest focus of directors elected through proxy access, and the increase in Board turnover, which could create a Board without the experience to lead the Company to achieve its long-term goals.

The proponents refer to a study by the CFA Institute to support the argument that proxy access would be beneficial and result in shareholder value. However, the CFA Institute’s study expressly excluded from its analysis two studies which concluded that increased proxy access is associated with negative economic impacts, on the basis that it deemed the methodology of those studies as faulty.

Lastly, proponents note that their proposal is similar to the vacated 2010 SEC proxy access rules. However, those rules were vacated in 2011 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, who found that the SEC was “arbitrary and capricious” in promulgating the Proxy Access Rule, stating that the SEC failed to adequately address the economic consequences of the Rule. Thus, the SEC’s adoption of the 2010 Proxy Access Rules provides poor support for this proposal.

For the foregoing reasons, the Board unanimously believes that this proposal is not in the best interests of Netflix or our stockholders, and recommends that you vote “AGAINST” Proposal Five.

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of the majority of the Votes Cast is required to approve the stockholder proposal. The proposal is precatory and, accordingly, is not binding on the Board or the Company.

Netflix Recommendation

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “AGAINST” THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL TO ADOPT A PROXY ACCESS BYLAW.

23


PROPOSAL SIX STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL TO ADOPT A CLAWBACK POLICY2021 PROXY STATEMENT          19

In accordance


OUR BOARD EVALUATION PROCESS

Each year, our Board conducts a self-evaluation process to help assure and enhance its performance. This process is overseen by the Nominating and Governance Committee, and involves interviews of each director by our Chief Legal Officer. Feedback is sought primarily in the following areas: (a) the Board’s effectiveness, structure, culture and composition, (b) the quality of and access to information shared with SEC rules,the Board about our business and (c) performance of the directors and quality of Board discussions.

How We Govern

and are Governed

OUR APPROACH TO CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Philosophy

Netflix operates in a dynamic industry and has been in a state of constant innovation since inception. We have redefined how people watch video—first through DVD-by-mail, then streaming video, and now as one of the world’s leading entertainment services with approximately 208 million memberships in 190 countries. Our success has not gone unnoticed, and we are seeing increasing competition, even as this dynamic market continues to evolve.

Our corporate governance structure is built against this backdrop. Governance, in this context, means finding the right balance of rights and responsibilities among stockholders, the Board, and management, and ensuring that there are appropriate checks and balances in place. With the rapid evolution of technology and the changing media landscape, we are continually adjusting our service to meet the dynamic needs and desires of our consumers. Our governance structure is built to help us to do that. Our focus is on creating long-term value for our stockholders, and we have set forth below abeen successful at that – since our initial public offering in 2002, annualized total stockholder proposal, alongreturn through December 31, 2020 was 40%.

Our governance structure is unconventional. We have several provisions that give our Board and our management team the freedom to be forward-thinking, such as making investments to build our own production studios and developing our own animation capabilities, with the supporting statementconfidence that they will be able to see those investments to fruition. At the same time, we have paid attention to our stockholders and increased our accountability to them by adopting provisions such as proxy access. We are proud of our governance structure, both because of how it has supported our success to date and for being innovative, such as the stockholder proponent, for which weway that our Board has unfettered access to management and is able to seek information directly from employees all around the enterprise.

We strive to stay in tune with our ownership base. Our Board and our management team engage directly with our stockholders, and our Board accept no responsibility.and its committees consider stockholders’ feedback in assessing our governance structure, including our compensation program. These discussions provide a good opportunity to share views and answer questions; the input from our stockholders will continue to inform our ongoing evaluation of our structure.

We believe our approach to governance will continue to provide the greatest benefit to Netflix and our stockholders. We realize that elements of our structure may not fit within the standard corporate governance practices and that some stockholders take a different view. But we believe that Netflix’s long-term value is currently best optimized with our approach to governance.

LOGO

20          LOGO


Stockholder Engagement and 2020 Stockholder Proposals

At our 2020 annual meeting, stockholders presented three proposals for vote. One proposal requested additional disclosure around political spending, and the proposal did not receive majority support from stockholders. The stockholdersecond proposal is requiredrequested that we lower the two-thirds supermajority requirement for amending our charter and bylaws to be voted upon ata simple majority. This proposal did receive majority support from stockholders. The third proposal sought a public report regarding our Annual Meeting only if properly presented at our Annual Meeting. As explained below,equal employment opportunity policy, and received less than 1% support from stockholders.

We consider the voting results for stockholders proposals in our Board unanimously recommends that you vote “AGAINST”discussions and as we contemplate our governance structure.

We also engaged with stockholders to solicit feedback on a broad range of topics, including these stockholder proposals. We held 10 virtual meetings in the stockholder proposal.

The Cityfall of Philadelphia Public Employees Retirement System, Sixteenth Floor, Two Penn Center Plaza, Philadelphia, PA 19102-1712, the beneficial owner2020 with stockholders representing approximately 25% of shares of the Company’sour common stock with a market value greater than $2,000.00 on the date the proposal was submitted, has notified the Company of its intent to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting.

RESOLVED, that shareholders of Netflix Inc. urge the Compensation Committeeoutstanding. Members of the Board, accompanied by Company representatives as appropriate, participated in each of Directors (the “Committee”)these conversations. We also held numerous engagement meetings earlier in 2020, prior to adoptour 2020 annual meeting.

In addition to governance and compensation matters, our discussions in 2020 centered on our approach to environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters; diversity, equity and inclusion; our response to the COVID-19 pandemic; and our dual CEO management structure. Investors expressed a clawback policydesire to providesee improved disclosure on environmental and social matters, which the recent hire of our Sustainability Officer is intended to help address. We have also recently increased our disclosure about these topics partly in response to investor feedback by publishing an Inclusion Report in January 2021 along with our EEO-1 and ESG reports.

We also discussed our approach to governance, including our goal of ensuring that the Committee will review, and determine whetherwe are best able to seek recoupment of, incentive compensation paid, granted or awarded to a senior executive if, in the Committee’s judgment, (i) there has been misconduct resulting in a material violation of law or Netfilx’s[sic] policy that causes significant financial or reputational harm to Netflix, and (ii) the senior executive committed the misconduct or failed in his or her responsibility to manage or monitor conduct or risks; and disclose the circumstances of any recoupment if (i) required by law or regulation or (ii) the Committee determines that disclosureexecute our long-term vision, which we believe is in the best interests of all stockholders. Investors understood our rationale for our governance structure, even if they disagreed with it. While investors inquired about our dual CEO model and how it works for Netflix, none expressed that it was inappropriate for us. We explained that the dual CEO model formalized the prior working relationship between Reed and its shareholders.

“Recoupment” is (a) recoveryTed, and was an effective leadership model to further support our continued growth and international expansion. Stockholders gave us high marks for our response to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as our focus on employee well-being and our efforts to support the creative industry through our establishment of compensation already paid and (b) forfeiture, recapture, reduction or cancellation of amounts awarded or granted over which Netflix retains control. These amendments should operate prospectively and be implemented so as not to violate any contract, compensation plan, law or regulation.

Supporting Statement

hardship funds.

The adoptionfeedback on our compensation program was limited, with many investors understanding and supportive of a clawback policy would recoup incentive pay when there has been misconduct by a senior executive or whoour approach to compensation. While we did not commit misconduct but who failed in his or her management or monitoring responsibility. We also believehear thematic concerns about our compensation program during our meetings, one stockholder questioned some components of our compensation program, including the Company should publicly disclose whether it recouped pay so investors know whether the policy is being enforced. We are sensitiveability of our executives to privacy concernsallocate their compensation between cash and urge that the revised policy provide for disclosure that does not violate privacy expectations (subject to laws requiring fuller disclosure).

Finally, our proposal does not mandate a clawback; rather, it gives the Committee discretion to decide whether recoupment is appropriate in particular circumstances.stock options.

We urge shareholders to vote FOR this proposal.

Netflix Opposing Statement

The Board has considered the stockholder proposal and, for the reasons described below, believes that the proposal is not in the best interests of Netflix and our stockholders.

24


We hold all our employees, particularly our executive officers, to high standards of legal and ethical conduct, which standards are an integral part of Netflix culture. These standards are embodied, in part, in our Code of Ethics, by which each of our executive officers as well as our directors, officers and other employees to act and perform their duties ethically and honestly and with the utmost integrity. Any violation of our Code of Ethics or other policies may result in disciplinary action, including termination, and if warranted, legal proceedings for damages. The Board also opposes this proposal because the proposal is vague and implementing the proposal may create standards for incentive compensation recoupment that are inconsistent with existing and pending legal requirements, which may harm our ability to attract and retain high-quality executive talent.

Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 already requires recoupment of incentive awards from our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer if we are required to restate our financial statements due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements as a result of misconduct. The proposal seeks to apply a clawback policy to all “senior executives,” a term that is not defined in the proposal. Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Act mandates the SEC to create a rule requiring listed companies to adopt policies for recouping certain compensation or become ineligible for listing on the national stock exchanges. Rather than adopt a clawback policy at this time that may ultimately vary from the SEC’s interpretation of the requirements set forth in Section 954, the Board has determined that it is appropriate and in the best interests of Netflix and our stockholders to wait for the SEC’s rules to be finalized.

In light of our existing policies and governance culture, the Board believes that we achieve the underlying purpose of this proposal for promoting honest and ethical behavior without subjecting the Company to uncertainties introduced by this proposal that could negatively impact our ability to compete for talent.

For the foregoing reasons, the Board unanimously believes that this proposal is not in the best interests of Netflix or our stockholders, and recommends that you vote “AGAINST” Proposal Six.

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of the majority of the Votes Cast is required to approve the stockholder proposal. The proposal is precatory and, accordingly, is not binding on the Board or the Company.

Netflix Recommendation

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “AGAINST” THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL TO ADOPT A CLAWBACK POLICY.

25


PROPOSAL SEVENSTOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR A SHAREHOLDER RIGHT TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT

In accordance with SEC rules, we have set forth below a stockholder proposal, along with the supporting statement of the stockholder proponent, for which we and our Board accept no responsibility. The stockholder proposal is required to be voted upon at our Annual Meeting only if properly presented at our Annual Meeting. As explained below, our Board unanimously recommends that you vote “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal.

John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278, the beneficial owner of no less than 20 shares of the Company’s common stock on the date the proposal was submitted, has notified the Company of his intent to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting.

RESOLVED, shareholders requestfurther note that our board of directors undertake such steps as may be necessary to permit written consent by shareholders entitled to cast the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize the action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote thereon were present and voting. This written consent is to be consistent with applicable law and consistent with giving shareholders the fullest power to act by written consent consistent with applicable law. This includes shareholder ability to initiate any topic for written consent consistent with applicable law.

Supporting Statement

This proposal topic won majority shareholder support at 13 major companies in a single year. This included 67%-support at both Allstate and Sprint. Hundreds of major companies enable shareholder action by written consent. It might have received a still higher vote than 67% if small shareholders had the advantage of the same access to independent corporate governance recommendations as large shareholders. It might have received a still higher vote if the voting turnout of small shareholders equaled that of large shareholders.

Taking action by written consent in lieu of a meeting is a means shareholders can use to raise important matters outside the normal annual meeting cycle. A shareholder right to act by written consent is a way to bring an important matter to the attention of both management and shareholders outside the annual meeting cycle.

Netflix shareholders have no right to act by written consent. Shareholders of companies incorporated in Delaware, like NFLX, automatically have the right to act by written consent. However the NFLX took an extra effort to strip shareholders of this important right. NFLX shareholders also do not have any right to call a special meeting. It is all the more important to vote in favor of this proposal, which give shareholders an important right, when NFLX governing documents give its shareholders so little in rights compared to the vast majority of companies.

For instance the 3 directors who stood for election in 2017 received up to 48% in negative votes each. Shareholders should be able to vote every year on a director who gets a 48% negative vote instead of having such a director entrenched for3-years.

26


Netflix shareholders approved annual election of each director at 4 Netflix annual meeting starting in 2012. The impressiveyes-votes ranged from 75% to88%.Yet arrogant Netflix directors ignored this overwhelming voice of its shareholders. It is a question of how long will Netflix directors ignore shareholders in the face of increased high-stake competition with compeletiors [sic] such as abulked-up Disney.

Please vote to improve director accountability to shareholders:Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent- Proposal 7

Netflix Opposing Statement

The Board has considered the stockholder proposal and, for the reasons described below, believes that the proposal is not in the best interests of Netflix and our stockholders.

The Board opposes this proposal because it could have adverse consequences to Netflix and its stockholders, including potential abuse, disenfranchisement of minority stockholders, lack of transparency and accountability to our stockholders, and the undermining of an orderly governance process for taking significant corporate actions.

The Board believes that permitting action at a meeting (whether the annual meeting or a special meeting) is a fairer process than the action by written consent process as it provides all stockholders the opportunity to participate and vote. Meetings are held at a time, date and venue announced publicly in advance, and all stockholders receive prior notice of the meeting and are invited to attend the meeting and make their views known. Approval of proposals at a stockholder meeting ensures that proposals are widely disseminated to our stockholders through the proxy statement and any additional soliciting materials, which must contain information about the proposed action as specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission. If a meeting is convened, the Board is provided with an opportunity to present an analysis of such proposals and can present its recommendations to our stockholders. The proxy statement and any additional soliciting materials must be distributed to all stockholders of record in advance of the meeting, providing stockholders with sufficient time and opportunity to consider the proposals and make a decision regarding how to vote or direct their proxies. Such procedural protections provide all stockholders the opportunity to fully consider, discuss and deliberate the merits of a proposed action prior to voting.

By contrast, action by less than unanimous written consent at any time does not guarantee any of these protections or advantages. In general, stockholders are not entitled to receive notice of actions to be taken by written consent and, thus, may not be given sufficient time or opportunity to evaluate the proposed action. Further, the Board does not have the opportunity to analyze and provide a recommendation with respect to a proposed action by written consent, potentially preventing stockholders from receiving accurate and complete information on important pending actions, and proponents of the proposed action need not provide any information regarding themselves or their interests in the proposed action to other stockholders or Netflix. This stockholder proposal could allow stockholders owning slightly over 50 percent of the Company’s outstanding shares to act on a significant matter without prior notice of the meeting to all stockholders and without affording all stockholders the opportunity to present their views. This would disenfranchise stockholders who are not given the chance to participate. This is of particular concern in cases involving significant corporate actions and in the context of contests for corporate control of Netflix.

27


In addition, the action by written consent process could result in duplicative or contradictory written consents being circulated at the same time by multiple stockholder groups, creating substantial confusion and disruption among stockholders. Moreover, because proponents of an action by written consent need not satisfy any holding requirementscurrent practice with respect to our common stock, market participants engagingsupermajority provision is a mainstream practice. According to data from FactSet, more than forty percent of S&P 500 companies have supermajority provisions in short-term speculation could potentially determine the outcome of any particular issue. Subsets of stockholders with special interests would be able to use a written consent procedure at any time and as frequently as they choose to act on a variety of potentially significant matters without notice to all stockholders and without a meeting or another forum at which all stockholders would have a fair opportunity to discuss the merits of a proposed action and question management and the proponent on the basis for their respective positions. Such stockholders may not act in the interests of longer-term holders of our common stock, which may lead to fundamental corporate changes that cater to special or short-term interests.

For the foregoing reasons, the Board unanimously believes that this proposal is not in the best interests of Netflix or our stockholders, and recommends that you vote “AGAINST” Proposal Seven.

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of the majority of the Votes Cast is required to approve the stockholder proposal. The proposal is precatory and, accordingly, is not binding on the Board or the Company.

Netflix Recommendation

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “AGAINST” THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR A SHAREHOLDER RIGHT TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT.

28


PROPOSAL EIGHTSTOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR SIMPLE MAJORITY VOTE

In accordance with SEC rules, we have set forth below a stockholder proposal, along with the supporting statement of the stockholder proponent, for which weplace, and our Board accept no responsibility. Thethreshold is common and among the lower thresholds that companies have adopted. After consideration of stockholder proposal is requiredfeedback, industry trend data, and our corporate governance philosophy, we decided at this point not to be voted upon at our Annual Meeting only if properly presented at our Annual Meeting. As explained below, our Board unanimously recommends that you vote “AGAINST”lower the stockholder proposal.

California State Teachers’ Retirement System (“CalSTRS”), 100 Waterfront Place,MS-04, West Sacramento, CA 95605-2807, the beneficial owner of shares of the Company’s common stock with a market value greater than $2,000.00 on the date the proposal was submitted, has notified the Company of its intent to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting.

RESOLVED: Shareholders of Netflix, Inc. (the “Company”) request that our board take the steps necessary so that each voting requirement in our charter and bylaws that calls for a greater than simple majority vote be eliminated, and replaced by a requirement for a majority of the votes cast for and against applicable proposals, or a simple majority in compliance with applicable laws. If necessary this means the closest standard to a majority of the votes cast for and against such proposals consistent with applicable laws.

Supporting Statement

Under Delaware law, stockholders are entitled to amend a company’s bylaws. The Company’s bylaws contain several provisions that make effective stockholder oversight difficult. These include election of directors by plurality voting, as well asfrom its current supermajority voting requirements for stockholders to amend certain portions of the bylaws relating to director elections and qualifications and the removal of directors.

In 2017, stockholders voted on a binding stockholder proposal to amendthe-Company’s bylaws that would have replaced the election of directors by plurality voting with a majority vote standard. While stockholders gave this proposal 64.6% support, it failed to reach the supermajority vote requirement.

Stockholders have repeatedly asked the Company to take the steps necessary to eliminate the supermajority voting provisions. Since 2013, stockholders have approved proposals on this topic four times. Despite greater than 80% stockholder support for these proposals in 2013, 2015, and 2016, and 63% support last year, the board has refused to act on stockholders’ clear directive.

Under Delaware law, in order to allow stockholders to amend the Company’s bylaws by majority vote, the board must take the necessary-steps to initiate the process to amend the Netflix charter.

We believe that it is important to institute simple majority voting at Netflix in order to enable effective stockholder oversight of our company.

29


Netflix Opposing Statement

The Board has considered the stockholder proposal and, for the reasons described below, believes that the proposal is not in the best interests of Netflix and our stockholders.

The Board believes that this stockholder proposal seeking to adopt a simple majority vote in all cases requiring more than a simple majority would not be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.level. A simple majority vote requirement already applies to most corporate matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. We believe that in the current dynamic business environment, the supermajority we have in place is appropriate to increase stability in our operations, while still being set low enough for stockholders to have a voice on issues where there is strong consensus. We will continue to monitor and evaluate this issue.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          21


THE ROLE OF THE BOARD IN RISK OVERSIGHT

The Board’s role in our risk oversight process includes reviewing and discussing with members of management areas of material risk to the Company, including strategic, operational, financial and legal risks. The Board as a whole primarily deals with matters related to strategic and operational risk. The Audit Committee deals with matters of financial and legal risk, including cybersecurity risk. The Compensation Committee addresses risks related to compensation and other talent-related matters. The Nominating and Governance Committee manages risks associated with Board independence and corporate governance. Committees report to the full Board regarding their respective considerations and actions. Throughout 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, management, with the support of our Board and Audit Committee, engaged, assessed and led our efforts to mitigate operational, employee and other risks to our business associated with the pandemic.

How We are Organized

BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES

The Board held five meetings during 2020. Each Board member attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of Board meetings and meetings of the Board committees.

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board has three standing committees: (1) the Compensation Committee; (2) the Audit Committee; and (3) the Nominating and Governance Committee.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

In 2020, the Compensation Committee of the Board consisted of four non-employee directors: Messrs. Belmer, Döpfner, Haley (Chair), and Ms. Sweeney. Mr. Hoag also served on the Compensation Committee until Mr. Döpfner’s appointment to the Compensation Committee in March 2020. Each member of the Compensation Committee is independent in compliance with the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market as they pertain to Compensation Committee members. Each of the Compensation Committee members is also a non-employee director under Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act and an outside director under section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves all forms of compensation to be provided to our executive officers and directors. For a description of the role of the executive officers in recommending compensation and the role of any compensation consultants, please see the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below. The Compensation Committee held four meetings in 2020. Each member attended all the Compensation Committee meetings held in 2020.

The Report of the Compensation Committee is included in this Proxy Statement. In addition, the Board has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, which is available on our Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee of the Board consists of three non-employee directors: Mr. Barton, and Mses. Kilgore and Mather (Chair), each of whom is independent in compliance with the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market as they pertain to audit committee members. The Board has determined that Ms. Mather is an audit committee financial expert as defined by Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

LOGO

22          LOGO


The Audit Committee engages the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, reviews the Company’s financial controls, evaluates the scope of the annual audit, reviews audit results, consults with management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm prior to the presentation of financial statements to stockholders and, as appropriate, initiates inquiries into aspects of the Company’s internal accounting controls and financial affairs. The Audit Committee met seven times in 2020. Each member attended at least 75% of the Audit Committee meetings held in 2020.

The Report of the Audit Committee is included in this Proxy Statement. In addition, the Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which is available on our Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board consists of two non-employee directors, Messrs. Hoag (Chair) and Smith. Ambassador Rice served on the Nominating and Governance Committee through her resignation date, January 20, 2021. Each director serving on the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews and approves candidates for election and to fill vacancies on the Board, including re-nominations of members whose terms are due to expire, and reviews and provides guidance to the Board on corporate governance matters. The Nominating and Governance Committee met two times in 2020. Each member attended all the Nominating and Governance Committee meetings held in 2020, other than Mr. Smith who did not attend one meeting.

The Board has adopted a written charter for the Nominating and Governance Committee, which is available on our investor relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

None of our executive officers serves on the board of directors or compensation committee of a company that has an executive officer that serves on our Board or Compensation Committee. No member of our Board is an executive officer of a company in which one of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of that company.

In 2020, the Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Belmer, Döpfner (from March 2020), Haley, Hoag (through March 2020) and Ms. Sweeney, none of whom is currently or was formerly an officer or employee of the Company. None of Messrs. Belmer, Döpfner, Haley, or Hoag or Ms. Sweeney had a relationship with the Company that required disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. In addition to Messrs. Belmer, Döpfner, Haley, and Hoag and Ms. Sweeney, our Co-Chief Executive Officer, Reed Hastings, and Chief Talent Officer participated in the executive compensation process for the year ended December 31, 2020 as described below in the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

POLICY REGARDING DIRECTOR ATTENDANCE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Our policy regarding directors’ attendance at the annual meetings of stockholders and their attendance record at last year’s annual meeting of stockholders can be found on our Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          23


THE BOARD’S LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

The Board combines the role of Chairman and Chief Executive. While the Board reassesses maintaining the combined role from time to time, the Board believes that Mr. Hastings, a Co-Chief Executive Officer, is best situated to serve as Chairman because he is the director most familiar with our business and industry and is therefore best able to identify the strategic priorities to be discussed by the Board. The Board also believes that combining the role of Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer facilitates information flow between management and the Board and fosters strategic development and execution. The Board has appointed Jay Hoag as its lead independent director. As lead independent director, Mr. Hoag’s responsibilities include:

coordinating the activities of the independent directors, and authorization to call meetings of the independent directors;

coordinating with the Co-Chief Executive Officers and corporate secretary to set the agenda for Board meetings, soliciting and taking into account suggestions from other members of the Board;

chairing executive sessions of the independent directors;

providing feedback and perspective to the Co-Chief Executive Officers about discussions among the independent directors;

helping facilitate communication among the Co-Chief Executive Officers and the independent directors;

presiding at Board meetings where the Chair is not present; and

performing other duties assigned from time to time by the Board.

In addition, the Board maintains effective independent oversight through a number of governance practices, including, open and direct communication with management, input on meeting agendas, annual performance evaluations and regular executive sessions.

How to Communicate with Us

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

We provide a process for stockholders to send communications to the Board through the email address board@netflix.com. Information regarding stockholder communications with the Board can be found on the Company’s Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

LOGO

24          LOGO


How We are Paid

Since 2015, none of our directors receive cash for services they provide as directors or members of Board committees but may be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses for attending Board and Board committee meetings. Each non-employee director receives stock options pursuant to the Director Equity Compensation Plan. The Director Equity Compensation Plan provides for a monthly grant of stock options to each non-employee director of the Company in consideration for services provided to us and subject to the terms and conditions of our equity compensation plans.

We believe that for our company, compensating directors only with options is appropriate and creates the right incentives and long-term value alignment with stockholders. Without long-term value creation, directors are not compensated as the intrinsic value of options on dates of grant is zero.

The Company’s Restated Certificateactual number of Incorporationoptions granted each month to each of our directors is determined by the following formula: $25,000 / ([fair market value on the date of grant] x 0.40). Each monthly grant is made on the first trading day of the month, is fully vested upon grant and Bylaws do, however, requireis exercisable at a 66 2/3% “supermajority” votestrike price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. The table below sets forth information concerning the compensation of our non-employee directors during 2020.

In each of 2018 and 2019, Compensia advised the Board on our compensation program for certain fundamentalour Board for the upcoming year, based on a comparison against our peer group’s board compensation programs and other compensation-related developments. The prior time Compensia reviewed our Board’s compensation program was in 2015, and we adjusted our Board’s compensation program in 2016. We have not made any changes to the corporate governance posturecompensation program for our Board since then.

Name

  

Option Awards

($)(1)

   

Total

($)

 

Richard N. Barton

   376,943        376,943(4) 

Rodolphe Belmer

   377,175        377,175(5) 

Mathias Döpfner

   377,201        377,201(6) 

Timothy M. Haley

   376,943        376,943(7) 

Jay C. Hoag

   376,943        376,943(8) 

Leslie Kilgore

   376,943        376,943(9) 

Strive Masiyiwa(2)

   —         

Ann Mather

   376,943        376,943(10) 

Susan E. Rice(3)

   377,017        377,017(11) 

Bradford L. Smith

   376,943        376,943(12) 

Anne M. Sweeney

   376,943        376,943(13) 

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          25


(1)

Option awards reflect the monthly grant of stock options to each non-employee director on the dates and at the aggregate grant date fair values computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 as shown below. Only options to purchase whole shares are granted with any remaining amount of the grant value carried over to the next monthly grant. The differences in option award values for each of Messrs. Belmer and Döpfner and Ambassador Rice reflect the different carryover amounts relating to the appointment month for each director. For a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation reflected in the Option Awards column, refer to Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on January 28, 2021.

Grant Date

Fair Value
($)

1/2/2020

29,336  

2/3/2020

29,485  

3/2/2020

29,407  

4/1/2020

31,573  

5/1/2020

31,800  

6/1/2020

31,752  

7/1/2020

32,038  

8/3/2020

32,381  

9/1/2020

32,127  

10/1/2020

32,261  

11/2/2020

32,618  

12/1/2020

32,166  

(2)

Mr. Strive Masiyiwa was appointed to the Board on December 16, 2020 and did not receive a prorated grant of stock options.

(3)

Ambassador Susan Rice served on the Board through January 20, 2021.

(4)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Barton at December 31, 2020 was 31,411.

(5)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Belmer at December 31, 2020 was 4,078.

(6)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Döpfner at December 31, 2020 was 4,654.

(7)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Haley at December 31, 2020 was 37,361.

(8)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Hoag at December 31, 2020 was 34,162.

(9)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Kilgore at December 31, 2020 was 11,240.

(10)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Mather at December 31, 2020 was 16,401.

(11)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Rice at December 31, 2020 was 4,426.

(12)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Smith at December 31, 2020 was 23,407.

(13)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Sweeney at December 31, 2020 was 8,240.

LOGO

26          LOGO


Certain Relationships and

Related Transactions

AGREEMENTS WITH DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. These agreements require us to indemnify such individuals, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, for certain liabilities to which they may become subject as a result of their affiliation with us.

PROCEDURES FOR APPROVAL OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

We have a written policy concerning the review and approval of related party transactions. Potential related party transactions are identified through an internal review process that includes a review of payments made in connection with transactions in which related persons may have had a direct or indirect material interest. Those transactions that are determined to be related party transactions under Item 404 of Regulation S-K are submitted for review by the Audit Committee for approval and to conduct a conflicts-of-interest analysis. The individual identified as the “related party” may not participate in any review or analysis of the Company, including the procedures for calling stockholder meetings, altering the sizerelated party transaction.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          27


Proposal 2

Our Auditors

Ratification of

Appointment of

Independent Registered

Public Accounting Firm

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY

RECOMMENDS THAT THE

STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT

OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS

THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING

FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING

DECEMBER 31, 2021

LOGO

LOGO


The Audit Committee of the Board and removing directors. The supermajority voting requirements were adopted by our stockholders and were intendedhas selected Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”), an independent registered public accounting firm, to preserve and maximizeaudit the valuefinancial statements of the Company for allthe year ending December 31, 2021. We are submitting its selection of Ernst & Young for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. A representative of Ernst & Young is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement and is expected to provide protectionbe available to respond to appropriate questions. Ernst & Young has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since March 21, 2012. Neither applicable law nor our bylaws require that stockholders ratify the selection of Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firm. However, we are submitting the selection of Ernst & Young to stockholders for allratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If stockholders against self-interested actions by one ordo not ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain Ernst & Young. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, at its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the year if they determine that such a few large stockholders. The Board continues to believe these requirements are appropriate and in the best interest of all stockholders; therefore, the Board opposes this stockholder proposal.

For the foregoing reasons, the Board unanimously believes that this proposal is notchange would be in the best interests of Netflix or our stockholders, and recommends that you vote “AGAINST” Proposal Eight.

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of the majority of the Votes Cast is required to approve the stockholder proposal. The proposal is precatory and, accordingly, is not binding on the Board or the Company.

Netflix Recommendation

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “AGAINST” THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR SIMPLE MAJORITY VOTE.

30


PROPOSAL NINESTOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL TO AMEND SECTIONS 2.8 AND 3.3 OF THE BYLAWS TO MAJORITY VOTE

In accordance with SEC rules, we have set forth below a stockholder proposal, along with the supporting statement of the stockholder proponent, for which we and our Board accept no responsibility. The stockholder proposal is required to be voted upon at our Annual Meeting only if properly presented at our Annual Meeting. As explained below, our Board unanimously recommends that you vote “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal.

Services Employees International Union (“SEIU”), 800 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20036, the beneficial owner of no less than 271 shares of the Company’s common stock on the date the proposal was submitted, has notified the Company of its intent to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting.

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Netflix, Inc. (“Netflix”) hereby amend the bylaws by

(a) replacing the first sentence of the third paragraph of Article III, Section 3.3, which provides for directors to be elected by a plurality of shares voted, with the following:

“Elections of directors at all meetings of the stockholders at which directors are to be elected shall be by ballot. Subject to the rights of the holders of any Preferred Stock of the corporation to elect additional directors under specified circumstances, directors shall be elected by the affirmative vote of the majority of the shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the subject matter, provided that if the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected, the directors shall be elected by the vote of a plurality of the shares represented in person or by proxy at any such meeting.”;

(b) adding at the end of that Section 3.3 the following new paragraph:

“If an incumbent director is running uncontested and is not elected, such director shall promptly offer to tender his or her irrevocable resignation to the Board. A committee designated by the Board, will recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken.

The Board will act on the Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within ninety (90) days following the date of the certification of the election results. The director who tenders his or her resignation will not participate in the Board’s decision with respect to such resignation.”;

and

(c) deleting from the first sentence of the final paragraph of Article II, Section 2.8 the phrase “other than the election of directors and” and deleting the final sentence of that Section 2.8, which states: “Directors shall be elected by a pluralityofthe votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors.”

31


Supporting Statement

This proposal would amend Netflix’s bylaws so that directors in uncontested elections would be elected by a majority of shares voted. We view a majority vote standard as long overdue at Netflix. Ninety percent of S&P 500 companies have majority voting in place, according to ISS. Netflix shareholders cast a majority of yes/no votes in favor of a majority vote standard in 2013, 2014, 2016, and 2017, yet Netflix has not acted.

Shareholder support for current Netflix directors is low. Director Barton failed to receive majority support in his last election. Directors Mather and Hoag were last elected with under 60% support. By contrast, average support in S&P 500 director elections in 2017 was 97%.

Board composition is also an issue. Half of Netflix’s independent directors have tenures of at least 12 years and the board lacks racial diversity.

Netflix Opposing Statement

The Board has considered the stockholder proposal and, for the reasons described below, believes that the proposal is not in the best interests of Netflix and our stockholders.

The Board does not believe that majority votingPRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

During 2020 and 2019, fees for services provided by Ernst & Young was as follows (in thousands):

  

 

  2020   2019 

Audit Fees

  $5,351  $4,936

Audit-Related Fees

   70    

Tax Fees

   2,096   2,927

Total

  $7,517  $7,863

Audit Fees include amounts related to the audit of our annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, and quarterly review of the financial statements included in the uncontested election of directors augments the role of stockholdersour Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Audit fees also include amounts related to accounting consultations and services rendered in the election of directors. Netflix has had plurality voting in place sinceconnection with the Company’s initial public offering,issuance of senior notes in 2020 and the Board believes that this practice has served the Company2019, respectively, as well in electing highly-qualifiedas fees for statutory audit filings.

Audit-Related Fees include fees related to assurance and independent directors. We expect our directors to support policiesrelated services that are inreasonably related to the long-term best interestsperformance of Netflix and our stockholders, even if such choices could lead to “withhold” vote campaigns against qualified directors. This is particularly important for our stockholders as Netflix operates in a highly competitive and extremely dynamic marketplace. As a Board, we strongly believe that a majority voting policy, and the potential distraction that ensues therefrom, does not enhance the abilityaudit or review of our directors to act in the long-term best interests of Netflix and our stockholders.financial statements, including attestation services that are not required by statute or regulation.

Plurality voting is the default standard under Delaware law for the election of directors and, accordingly, the rules governing plurality voting are well-established over many decades of experience and precedent. Deviating from the Delaware standard is unnecessary given that under the plurality voting standard, stockholders have the ability to express disapproval of corporate policies, strategy or director candidates through the use of withhold votes. Institutional and retail investors successfully utilize withhold vote campaigns to influence corporate policies and director elections. The use of withhold votes provides the Board with flexibility in appropriately responding to stockholder dissatisfaction, while continuing to empower the Board to fulfill its fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of all stockholders. In addition, stockholders who are truly dissatisfied with director candidates have the ability to nominate alternative candidates and also may make recommendations for nominations directly to the Company’s Nominating and Governance committee.

For the foregoing reasons, the Board unanimously believes that this proposal is not in the best interests of Netflix or our stockholders, and recommends that you vote “AGAINST” Proposal Nine.

32


Required Vote

This binding proposal would amend Sections 2.8 and 3.3The four nominees receiving the highest number of the Company’s bylaws. As such, the affirmative vote of at leastsixty-six andtwo-thirds percent (66 2/3%) of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of voting stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, votingVotes Cast will each be elected as a single class, is required to approve the stockholder proposal.Class I directors.

Netflix Recommendation

 

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “AGAINST” THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL TO AMEND SECTIONS 2.8 AND 3.3 OF THE BYLAWS TO MAJORITY VOTE.
LOGO


The Board unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote “FOR” the nominees listed above.

 

33LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          9


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENTWho We Are

The following table sets forth certain information known toBOARD OVERVIEW

Our Board is composed of 12 highly experienced, talented, and qualified directors with experience as board members and executives at some of the Company with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 9, 2018 by (i) each stockholderworld’s most successful companies. We believe that the Company knowsBoard is well situated to navigate the beneficial ownerchanging competitive terrain that Netflix operates within. The Board has led Netflix through its evolution from a US DVD-by-mail company to a global streaming company to one of more than 5%the leading entertainment companies in the world, while effectively managing risk and overseeing management performance. By successfully navigating this evolution, our annualized total stockholder return since our initial public offering in 2002 through December 31, 2020 was 40%.

LOGO

Board Tenure

LOGO

Gender Diversity

Board balances fresh thinking, new perspectives, and emerging skill needs with institutional knowledge and stability

A quarter of directors are women.

LOGOLOGO

LOGO

LOGO

10          LOGO


OUR DIRECTORS

Directors standing for election:

LOGO

RICHARD BARTON

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2002 CLASS: I AGE: 53

COMMITTEES: AUDIT

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Having founded successful internet-based companies (including Zillow, Expedia and GlassDoor), Mr. Barton provides strategic and technical insight to the Board. In addition, Mr. Barton brings experience with respect to marketing products to consumers through the internet.

Also...

Mr. Barton was a venture partner at Benchmark, a venture capital firm that has been an early-stage investor in companies like Twitter, Instagram, Uber and Zillow, from 2005 until 2018. He has served on many public company boards. Mr. Barton holds a B.S. in general engineering: industrial economics from Stanford University.

Career Snapshot:

•  Chief Executive and co-founder of Zillow-Group (since 2010)

•  Co-founder and Chairman of GlassDoor (2007-2018)

•  Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Expedia (1996-2003)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Qurate (formerly Liberty Interactive)

•  Zillow Group

•  Altimeter Growth Corp.

•  Altimeter Growth Corp. 2

LOGO

RODOLPHE BELMER

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2018 CLASS: I AGE: 51

COMMITTEES: COMPENSATION

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

As a media executive located in France, Mr. Belmer brings a unique international perspective to the Board. In addition, his media experience and business acumen provide the Board with valuable insight as it expands its global operations.

Also...

Mr. Belmer began his career in the marketing department of Procter & Gamble France before joining McKinsey in 1998. He is a graduate of France’s HEC business school.

Career Snapshot:

•  CEO and director of Eutelsat, the leading satellite operator in Europe, the Middle East and Africa (since 2016)

•  CEO of Canal + Group (2012-2015); various additional roles since joining in 2001

Other Public Company Boards

•  None

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          11


LOGO

BRAD SMITH

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2015 CLASS: I AGE: 62

COMMITTEES: NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

With a leading role at Microsoft, Mr. Smith brings broad business and international experience on a variety of issues, including government affairs and public policy to the Board. Mr. Smith also brings experience playing a key role in representing Microsoft externally and in leading Microsoft’s work on a number of critical issues, including privacy, security, accessibility, environmental sustainability and digital inclusion, among others, which provides additional expertise to the Board.

Also...

Mr. Smith has led a push for diversity within Microsoft’s legal division, advocating for increasing employment of diverse employees at the company and associated law firms. Mr. Smith holds a B.A. in international relations and economics from Princeton, a J.D. from Columbia University School of Law and also studied international law and economics at the Graduate Institute of International Studies in Geneva.

Career Snapshot:

•  President and Chief Legal Officer of Microsoft (since 2015); he originally joined Microsoft in 1993

•  Associate and then Partner, Covington & Burling (1986-1993)

Other Public Company Boards

•  None

LOGO

ANNE SWEENEY

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2015 CLASS: I AGE: 63

COMMITTEES: COMPENSATION

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Ms. Sweeney has held various senior positions with large entertainment companies, which provided her with broad strategic and operational experience. Her experience in the entertainment industry provides a unique business perspective to the Board as Netflix builds its global internet TV network.

Also...

Ms. Sweeney’s entertainment experience spans more than three decades, including her oversight of Disney’s cable, broadcast and satellite properties globally for 18 years. During that time, she was charged with launching and running over 118 Disney Channels in 164 countries in 34 languages, and had oversight over various ABC properties including ABC Television Network, ABC Studios and the Disney ABC Cable Networks Group. Prior to Disney, she was CEO of FX Networks, Inc. from 1993 to 1996 and spent more than 12 years at Viacom’s Nickelodeon Network. She holds an Ed. M. From Harvard University and a B.A. from the College of New Rochelle.

Career Snapshot:

•  Co-chair of Disney Media Networks and President of Disney/ABC Television Group (1996-2015)

•  Chairman and CEO of FX Networks, part of the Fox Entertainment Group/21st Century Fox (1993-1996)

Other Public Company Boards

•  None

LOGO

12          LOGO


Directors not standing for election:

LOGO

REED HASTINGS

CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT OF THE COMPANY, AND CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

DIRECTOR AND CHAIRMAN SINCE: 1997 CLASS: III (EXPIRES 2023) AGE: 60
COMMITTEES: NONE

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Mr. Hastings, as co-founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer, deeply understands the technology and business of Netflix and brings strategic and operational insight to the Board. He is also a software engineer, holds an MSCS in Artificial Intelligence from Stanford University, and has unique management and industry insights.

Also...

Mr. Hastings is an active educational philanthropist: he served on the California State Board of education from 2000 to 2004, and after receiving his B.A. from Bowdoin College in 1983 served in the Peace Corps as a high school math teacher in Swaziland. Mr. Hastings previously served on the board of Facebook, Inc. from 2011-2019.

Career Snapshot:

•  Founder, Co-Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of Netflix (since 1997)

•  Founder, Pure Software (1991) through IPO (1995) and ultimate sale to Rational Software

Other Public Company Boards

•  None

LOGO

JAY C. HOAG

LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 1999 CLASS: III (EXPIRES 2023) AGE: 62

COMMITTEES: NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE (CHAIR)

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

As a venture capital investor, Mr. Hoag brings strategic insights and financial experience to the Board. He has evaluated, invested in and served as a board member on numerous companies, both public and private, and is familiar with a full range of corporate and board functions. His many years of experience in helping companies shape and implement strategy provide the Board with unique perspectives on matters such as risk management, corporate governance, talent selection and management.

Also...

Mr. Hoag has been a technology investor and venture capitalist for more than 38 years, involved in a large number of technology investments including Altiris (acquired by Symantec), CNET, Expedia, Facebook, Fandango (acquired by Comcast), Intuit, and Sybase. Mr. Hoag is on the Investment Advisory Committee at the University of Michigan, the Board of Trustees of Northwestern University, and the Board of Trust at Vanderbilt University. Previously, Mr. Hoag has served on the board of directors of numerous other public and private companies, including TechTarget, Inc. from 2004-2016. Mr. Hoag holds an M.B.A. from the University of Michigan and a B.A. from Northwestern University.

Career Snapshot:

•  Founding General Partner at TCV (Technology Crossover Ventures), a venture capital firm (since 1995)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Electronic Arts

•  Peloton Interactive

•  TCV Acquisition Corp.

•  TripAdvisor

•  Zillow Group

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          13


LOGO

MATHIAS DÖPFNER

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2018 CLASS: III (EXPIRES 2023) AGE: 58

COMMITTEES: COMPENSATION

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

As a media executive located in Germany, Mr. Döpfner brings international perspective, media experience and business acumen to the Board.

Also...

Mr. Döpfner has extensive experience in media and digital transformation and a strong track record of increasing revenues related to digital activities. He previously served on the boards of Vodafone Group plc (2015-2018) and Time Warner Inc. (2006-2018). Additionally, his relationships and honorary offices at entities including the American Academy, the American Jewish Committee and the European Publishers Council among many others provide him with relevant insight and perspective in international media. He studied Musicology, German and Theatrical Arts in Frankfurt and Boston.

Career Snapshot:

•  Chairman and CEO, Axel Springer SE, Europe’s leading digital publishing house (since 2002)

•  His former roles at Axel Springer SE include editor-in-chief of Die Welt (1998-2000) and as a member of the Management Board (starting in 2000)

•  Visiting Professor in media at University of Cambridge, St. John’s College (2010)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Warner Music Group

LOGO

TIMOTHY HALEY

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 1998 CLASS: II (EXPIRES 2022) AGE: 66
COMMITTEES: COMPENSATION (CHAIR)

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

As a venture capital investor, Mr. Haley brings strategic and financial experience to the Board. He has evaluated, invested in and served as a board member on numerous companies. His executive recruiting background also provides the Board with insight into talent selection and management.

Also...

Mr. Haley was President of Haley Associates, an executive recruiting firm serving the high technology industry from 1986 - 1998, and serves on the boards of several private companies. Mr. Haley holds a B.A. from Santa Clara University.

Career Snapshot:

•  Managing Director, Redpoint Ventures, a venture capital firm (since 1999)

•  Managing Director, Institutional Venture Partners, a venture capital firm (since 1998)

Other Public Company Boards

•  2U, Inc.

•  ThredUp

•  Zuora

LOGO

14          LOGO


LOGO

LESLIE KILGORE

DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2012 (INDEPENDENT SINCE 2015) CLASS: II (EXPIRES 2022) AGE: 55
COMMITTEES: AUDIT

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Ms. Kilgore’s experience as a marketing executive with internet retailers and consumer product companies provides a unique business perspective and her numerous managerial positions provide strategic and operational experience to the Board.

Also...

As our former Chief Marketing Officer, Ms. Kilgore deeply understands the Netflix business and is able to bring years of marketing experience to the Board. She holds an M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business and a B.S. from The Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania. She previously served on the board of LinkedIn Corp., and she currently serves on the boards of several other companies.

Career Snapshot:

•  Chief Marketing Officer of Netflix (2000-2012)

•  Director of Marketing at Amazon (1999-2000)

•  Brand manager at The Procter & Gamble Company (1992-1999)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Medallia

•  Pinterest

LOGO

STRIVE MASIYIWA

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2020 CLASS: II (EXPIRES 2022) AGE: 60

COMMITTEES: NONE

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

As the Chairman and founder of Econet Global, a telecommunications and technology group with operations and investments in 29 countries in Africa and Europe, Mr. Masiyiwa provides a unique international perspective to the Board. In addition, his experience in building businesses across Africa and the world provides the Company with valuable insight as it expands globally.

Also...

Mr. Masiyiwa serves on several international boards including Unilever Plc, National Geographic Society, Asia Society, and the Global Advisory boards of Bank of America, the Council on Foreign Relations (in the US), Stanford University, and the Prince of Wales Trust for Africa, and is a longstanding board member of the United States Holocaust Museum’s Committee on Conscience. A former board member of the Rockefeller Foundation for 15 years, he is Chairman Emeritus of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) and African Union Special Envoy to the continent’s COVID response. He received a BSc in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the University of Wales. Mr. Masiyiwa has received honorary doctorates from Morehouse College, Yale University, Nelson Mandela University and Cardiff University.

Career Snapshot:

•  Founder and Executive Chairman of Econet Global (1993-Present)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Unilever Plc

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          15


LOGO

ANN MATHER

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2010 CLASS: II (EXPIRES 2022) AGE: 61

COMMITTEES: AUDIT (CHAIR, FINANCIAL EXPERT)

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Ms. Mather’s experience as an executive with several major media companies provides a unique business perspective. As a former CFO and senior finance executive at major corporations, she brings more than 20 years of financial and accounting expertise to the Board. Additionally, Ms. Mather’s numerous managerial positions and service on public company boards provides strategic, operational and corporate governance experience.

Also...

Ms. Mather previously served on the board of Shutterfly, Inc., a photography and image-sharing company (2013-2019) and Glu Mobile Inc., a publisher of mobile games (2005-2021). She has also been an independent trustee to the board of trustees of Dodge & Cox Funds, a mutual fund, since May 2011. She received her M.A. from Cambridge University, and is an Honorary Fellow of Sidney Sussex College Cambridge.

Career Snapshot:

•  Executive Vice President and CFO of Pixar (1999 - 2004)

•  Executive Vice President and CFO of Village Roadshow Pictures (1999)

•  Various executive positions at The Walt Disney Company (1993-1999)

Other Public Company Boards

•  Alphabet (formerly Google)

•  Airbnb

•  Bumble

•  Arista Networks

LOGO

TED SARANDOS

CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF CONTENT OFFICER OF THE COMPANY

DIRECTOR SINCE: 2020 CLASS: III (EXPIRES 2023) AGE: 56

COMMITTEES: NONE

Why this director is valuable to Netflix

Mr. Sarandos, as Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Content Officer, is integral to developing corporate strategy and oversees the teams responsible for the acquisition, creation and promotion of all Netflix content including original series from around the world. His in-depth knowledge about Netflix and experience in the entertainment industry provide a unique business perspective to the Board.

Also...

Mr. Sarandos has been responsible for all content operations since 2000, and led the Company’s transition into original content production that began in 2013 with the launch of series such as House of Cards, Arrested Development and Orange is the New Black. With more than 20 years’ experience in home entertainment, he is recognized in the industry as an innovator in film acquisition and distribution and was named one of Time Magazine’s 100 Most Influential People of 2013. He is a Henry Crown Fellow at the Aspen Institute and serves on the board of Exploring The Arts, a nonprofit focused on arts in schools. Mr. Sarandos also serves on the Film Advisory Board for the Tribeca and Los Angeles Film Festivals, is an American Cinematheque board member, an Executive Committee Member of the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences and is a trustee of the American Film Institute.

Career Snapshot:

•  Co-Chief Executive Officer (since July 2020) and Chief Content Officer of Netflix (since 2000)

•  Executive at video distributor ETD and Video City/West Coast video, a video rental retail chain

•  Producer/Executive Producer for award-winning and critically acclaimed documentaries and independent films including the Emmy-nominated Outrage and Tony Bennett: The Music Never Ends.

Other Public Company Boards

•  Spotify

LOGO

16          LOGO


BOARD SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE

Our Board believes that having a diverse mix of our common stock, (ii) each directordirectors with complementary skills, experience, and nominee for director, (iii) each ofexpertise is important to meeting its oversight responsibility. That diversity, combined with transparent and broad access to information and exposure to management beyond the executive officers, named inallows the “Summary Executive Compensation” table, which we referBoard to asexercise effective management oversight and to ensure the Named Executive Officers, and (iv) all executive officers and directors ascare of our stockholders’ interests. Below are a group. The Company has relied upon information provided to the Company by its directors and Named Executive Officers and copies of documents sent to the Company that have been filed with the SEC by others for purposes of determining the number of sharesskills that our Board members bring to Netflix. If an individual is not listed under a particular attribute, it does not signify a director’s lack of ability to contribute in such area.

LOGO  

Leadership

Experience and expertise in identifying and developing opportunities for long-term value creation, including experience in driving innovation, opening markets, improving operations, identifying risks, and executing successfully.

Richard Barton

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Timothy Haley

Reed Hastings

Jay Hoag

Leslie Kilgore

Strive Masiyiwa

Ann Mather

Brad Smith

Ted Sarandos

Anne Sweeney

LOGO  

Strategy

Experience and expertise in identifying and developing opportunities for long-term value creation, including experience in driving innovation, opening markets, improving operations, identifying risks, and executing successfully.

Richard Barton

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Timothy Haley

Reed Hastings

Jay Hoag

Leslie Kilgore

Strive Masiyiwa

Ann Mather

Ted Sarandos

Brad Smith

Anne Sweeney

LOGO  

Finance & Accounting

Management or oversight of the finance function of an enterprise, resulting in proficiency in complex financial management, capital allocation, and financial reporting processes.

Richard Barton

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Timothy Haley

Reed Hastings

Jay Hoag

Leslie Kilgore

Ann Mather

Anne Sweeney

LOGO  

Entertainment & Media

Experience and expertise with the entertainment and media industry, resulting in a deep understanding of consumer expectations and innovations in content and delivery.

Richard Barton

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Reed Hastings

Leslie Kilgore

Ann Mather

Ted Sarandos

Anne Sweeney

LOGO  

Demographic Diversity

Representation of gender, ethnic, race, geographic, cultural, or other perspectives that expand the Board’s understanding of the needs and viewpoints of our members, partners, employees, governments, and other stakeholders worldwide.

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Leslie Kilgore

Strive Masiyiwa

Ann Mather

Anne Sweeney

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          17


LOGO  

Global Business & Government Relations

Expertise in global business cultures, consumer preferences, and /or government relations gained through local experience in international markets or senior positions overseeing public policy.

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Strive Masiyiwa

Ann Mather

Brad Smith

LOGO  

Technology

Experience and expertise in technology-related business or technology functions, resulting in knowledge of how to anticipate technological trends, understand and manage technology related risks, generate disruptive innovation, and extend or create new business models.

Richard Barton

Reed Hastings

Jay Hoag

Strive Masiyiwa

Brad Smith

LOGO  

Marketing

Experience and expertise developing strategies to grow market share, package and position product offerings, build brand awareness and equity, and enhance enterprise reputation.

Richard Barton

Rodolphe Belmer

Leslie Kilgore

Ted Sarandos

LOGO  

Human Capital Management

Experience and expertise related to human resource issues such as attracting and retaining talent, succession planning, engagement of employees, and the development and evolution of culture, including the alignment of culture and long-term strategy.

Timothy Haley

Reed Hastings

Ted Sarandos

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The Board has determined that each person beneficially owns. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance withof Messrs. Barton, Belmer, Döpfner, Haley, Hoag, Masiyiwa and Smith, and Mses. Kilgore, Mather, and Sweeney are independent under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and generally includesthe listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market; therefore, every member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee is an independent director in accordance with those persons who have voting or investment powerstandards. In addition, the Board determined that Ambassador Rice was independent during the time she served on the Board.

LOGO

18          LOGO


How We are Selected,

Elected and Evaluated

CONSIDERATION OF DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Director Qualifications

In discharging its responsibilities to nominate candidates for election to the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee has not specified any minimum qualifications for serving on the Board. However, the Nominating and Governance Committee endeavors to evaluate, propose and approve candidates with business experience, diversity, as well as personal skills and knowledge with respect to the securities. Except as otherwise indicated,technology, finance, marketing, financial reporting and subjectany other areas that may be expected to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power withcontribute to an effective Board. With respect to all sharesdiversity, the committee may consider such factors as diversity in viewpoint, professional experience, education, international experience, skills and other individual qualifications and attributes that contribute to board heterogeneity, including characteristics such as gender, race, and national origin.

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors

The Nominating and Governance Committee utilizes a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. Candidates may come to the attention of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned by them. SharesNominating and Governance Committee through management, current Board members, stockholders or other persons. These candidates are evaluated at meetings of the Company’s common stock subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 9, 2018 are also deemed outstanding for purposes of calculatingNominating and Governance Committee as necessary and discussed by the percentage ownership of that person, and if applicable, the percentage ownershipmembers of the executive officersNominating and directors as a group, but are not treated as outstandingGovernance Committee from time to time. Candidates may be considered at any point during the year.

The Nominating and Governance Committee considers properly submitted stockholder nominations for candidates for the purposeBoard. Following verification of calculating the percentage ownershipstockholder status of persons proposing candidates, recommendations are aggregated and considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee. If any materials are provided by a stockholder in connection with the nomination of a director candidate, such materials are forwarded to the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee also reviews materials provided by professional search firms or other person. Unless otherwise indicated,parties in connection with a nominee who is not proposed by a stockholder.

Stockholder Nominees

The Nominating and Governance Committee considers properly submitted stockholder nominations for candidates for membership on the addressBoard as described above under “Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for eachDirectors.” Any stockholder listed innominations proposed for consideration by the table below is c/oNominating and Governance Committee should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for Board membership. In addition, they should be submitted within the time frame as specified under “Stockholder Proposals” above and mailed to: Netflix, Inc., 100 Winchester Circle, Los Gatos, CA 95032.California 95032, Attention: Secretary.

Our bylaws provide a proxy access right for stockholders, pursuant to which a stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, owning at least three percent of outstanding shares of our common stock continuously for at least three years, may nominate and include in our annual meeting proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of (a) two directors or (b) twenty percent of the Board, subject to certain limitations and provided that the stockholders and nominees satisfy the requirements specified in our bylaws.

 

Name and Address Number of Shares
  Beneficially Owned
  Percent of
Class
 

Capital Research Global Investors(1)

333 South Hope Street

Los Angeles, CA 90071

  44,954,952   10.34% 

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(2)

100 Vanguard Blvd

Malvern, PA 19355

  28,913,685   6.65% 

BlackRock, Inc.(3)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

  25,799,694   5.94% 

FMR LLC(4)

245 Summer Street

Boston, MA 02210

  24,810,211   5.71% 

The Growth Fund of America(5)

6455 Irvine Center Drive

Irvine, CA 92618

  22,546,471   5.19% 

Reed Hastings(6)

  10,759,989   2.48% 

Jay C. Hoag(7)

528 Ramona Street

Palo Alto, CA 94301

  4,987,752   1.15% 

Neil Hunt(8)

  1,245,937    

Ted Sarandos(9)

  497,699    

David Hyman (10)

  211,911    

LOGO

34

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          19


Name and Address Number of Shares
  Beneficially Owned
  Percent of
Class
 

David Wells(11)

  210,815    

Greg Peters (12)

  207,928    

A. George (Skip) Battle(13)

  158,276    

Richard N. Barton(14)

  87,909    

Timothy M. Haley(15)

c/o Redpoint Ventures

3000 Sand Hill Road

Building 2, Suite 290

Menlo Park, CA 94025

  65,687    

Leslie Kilgore(16)

  51,589    

Ann Mather(17)

  36,735    

Bradford L. Smith(18)

  17,867    

Anne M. Sweeney(19)

  17,867    

Rodolphe Belmer(20)

  673    

Susan E. Rice(21)

  222    

All directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons)(22)

  18,632,785   4.29% 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

OUR BOARD EVALUATION PROCESS

Each year, our Board conducts a self-evaluation process to help assure and enhance its performance. This process is overseen by the Nominating and Governance Committee, and involves interviews of each director by our Chief Legal Officer. Feedback is sought primarily in the following areas: (a) the Board’s effectiveness, structure, culture and composition, (b) the quality of and access to information shared with the Board about our business and (c) performance of the directors and quality of Board discussions.

How We Govern

and are Governed

OUR APPROACH TO CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Philosophy

Netflix operates in a dynamic industry and has been in a state of constant innovation since inception. We have redefined how people watch video—first through DVD-by-mail, then streaming video, and now as one of the world’s leading entertainment services with approximately 208 million memberships in 190 countries. Our success has not gone unnoticed, and we are seeing increasing competition, even as this dynamic market continues to evolve.

Our corporate governance structure is built against this backdrop. Governance, in this context, means finding the right balance of rights and responsibilities among stockholders, the Board, and management, and ensuring that there are appropriate checks and balances in place. With the rapid evolution of technology and the changing media landscape, we are continually adjusting our service to meet the dynamic needs and desires of our consumers. Our governance structure is built to help us to do that. Our focus is on creating long-term value for our stockholders, and we have been successful at that – since our initial public offering in 2002, annualized total stockholder return through December 31, 2020 was 40%.

Our governance structure is unconventional. We have several provisions that give our Board and our management team the freedom to be forward-thinking, such as making investments to build our own production studios and developing our own animation capabilities, with the confidence that they will be able to see those investments to fruition. At the same time, we have paid attention to our stockholders and increased our accountability to them by adopting provisions such as proxy access. We are proud of our governance structure, both because of how it has supported our success to date and for being innovative, such as the way that our Board has unfettered access to management and is able to seek information directly from employees all around the enterprise.

We strive to stay in tune with our ownership base. Our Board and our management team engage directly with our stockholders, and our Board and its committees consider stockholders’ feedback in assessing our governance structure, including our compensation program. These discussions provide a good opportunity to share views and answer questions; the input from our stockholders will continue to inform our ongoing evaluation of our structure.

We believe our approach to governance will continue to provide the greatest benefit to Netflix and our stockholders. We realize that elements of our structure may not fit within the standard corporate governance practices and that some stockholders take a different view. But we believe that Netflix’s long-term value is currently best optimized with our approach to governance.

 

LOGO

*Less than 1% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock.
20          LOGO


Stockholder Engagement and 2020 Stockholder Proposals

At our 2020 annual meeting, stockholders presented three proposals for vote. One proposal requested additional disclosure around political spending, and the proposal did not receive majority support from stockholders. The second proposal requested that we lower the two-thirds supermajority requirement for amending our charter and bylaws to a simple majority. This proposal did receive majority support from stockholders. The third proposal sought a public report regarding our equal employment opportunity policy, and received less than 1% support from stockholders.

We consider the voting results for stockholders proposals in our Board discussions and as we contemplate our governance structure.

We also engaged with stockholders to solicit feedback on a broad range of topics, including these stockholder proposals. We held 10 virtual meetings in the fall of 2020 with stockholders representing approximately 25% of our common stock outstanding. Members of the Board, accompanied by Company representatives as appropriate, participated in each of these conversations. We also held numerous engagement meetings earlier in 2020, prior to our 2020 annual meeting.

In addition to governance and compensation matters, our discussions in 2020 centered on our approach to environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters; diversity, equity and inclusion; our response to the COVID-19 pandemic; and our dual CEO management structure. Investors expressed a desire to see improved disclosure on environmental and social matters, which the recent hire of our Sustainability Officer is intended to help address. We have also recently increased our disclosure about these topics partly in response to investor feedback by publishing an Inclusion Report in January 2021 along with our EEO-1 and ESG reports.

We also discussed our approach to governance, including our goal of ensuring that we are best able to execute our long-term vision, which we believe is in the best interests of all stockholders. Investors understood our rationale for our governance structure, even if they disagreed with it. While investors inquired about our dual CEO model and how it works for Netflix, none expressed that it was inappropriate for us. We explained that the dual CEO model formalized the prior working relationship between Reed and Ted, and was an effective leadership model to further support our continued growth and international expansion. Stockholders gave us high marks for our response to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as our focus on employee well-being and our efforts to support the creative industry through our establishment of hardship funds.

The feedback on our compensation program was limited, with many investors understanding and supportive of our approach to compensation. While we did not hear thematic concerns about our compensation program during our meetings, one stockholder questioned some components of our compensation program, including the ability of our executives to allocate their compensation between cash and stock options.

We further note that our current practice with respect to our supermajority provision is a mainstream practice. According to data from FactSet, more than forty percent of S&P 500 companies have supermajority provisions in place, and our threshold is common and among the lower thresholds that companies have adopted. After consideration of stockholder feedback, industry trend data, and our corporate governance philosophy, we decided at this point not to lower the voting requirement from its current supermajority level. A simple majority vote requirement already applies to most corporate matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. We believe that in the current dynamic business environment, the supermajority we have in place is appropriate to increase stability in our operations, while still being set low enough for stockholders to have a voice on issues where there is strong consensus. We will continue to monitor and evaluate this issue.

 

LOGO

(1)As of December 29, 2017, based on information provided by Capital Research Global Investors in the Schedule 13G filed February 14, 2018. Of the shares beneficially owned, Capital Research Global Investors reported that it has sole dispositive power and sole voting power with respect to all of the shares.
2021 PROXY STATEMENT          21
(2)As of December 31, 2017, based on information provided by The Vanguard Group, Inc. in the Schedule 13G filed February 9, 2018. Of the shares beneficially owned, The Vanguard Group, Inc. reported that it has sole dispositive power with respect to 28,222,829 shares, shared dispositive power with respect to 690,856 shares, sole voting power with respect to 614,092 shares and shared voting power with respect to 92,889 shares.
(3)As of December 31, 2017, based on information provided by BlackRock, Inc. in the Schedule 13G filed February 8, 2018. Of the shares beneficially owned, BlackRock, Inc. reported that it has sole dispositive power with respect to all of the shares and sole voting power with respect to 22,290,287 shares.
(4)As of December 31, 2017, based on information provided by FMR LLC in the Schedule 13G filed on February 13, 2018. Of the shares beneficially owned, FMR LLC reported that it has sole voting power with respect to 3,389,323 and sole dispositive power with respect to all of the shares.
(5)As of December 29, 2017, based on information provided by The Growth Fund of America in the Schedule 13G filed February 14, 2018. According to information in that filing, these shares may also be reflected in the filing made by Capital Research Global Investors. The Growth Fund of America has no sole or shared dispositive or voting power with respect to the shares beneficially owned.
(6)Includes options to purchase 5,201,042 shares. Mr. Hastings is a trustee of the Hastings-Quillin Family Trust, which is the holder of 5,558,947 of the Company’s shares.
(7)

Includes (i) 2,313,810 common shares that are directly held by TCV VII, L.P. (“TCV VII”), (ii) 1,201,602 common shares that are directly held by TCV VII (A), L.P. (“TCV VII (A)”), (iii) 20,008 common shares that are directly held by TCV Member Fund, L.P. (“Member Fund”), (iv) 640,434


THE ROLE OF THE BOARD IN RISK OVERSIGHT

The Board’s role in our risk oversight process includes reviewing and discussing with members of management areas of material risk to the Company, including strategic, operational, financial and legal risks. The Board as a whole primarily deals with matters related to strategic and operational risk. The Audit Committee deals with matters of financial and legal risk, including cybersecurity risk. The Compensation Committee addresses risks related to compensation and other talent-related matters. The Nominating and Governance Committee manages risks associated with Board independence and corporate governance. Committees report to the full Board regarding their respective considerations and actions. Throughout 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, management, with the support of our Board and Audit Committee, engaged, assessed and led our efforts to mitigate operational, employee and other risks to our business associated with the pandemic.

How We are Organized

BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES

The Board held five meetings during 2020. Each Board member attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of Board meetings and meetings of the Board committees.

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board has three standing committees: (1) the Compensation Committee; (2) the Audit Committee; and (3) the Nominating and Governance Committee.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

In 2020, the Compensation Committee of the Board consisted of four non-employee directors: Messrs. Belmer, Döpfner, Haley (Chair), and Ms. Sweeney. Mr. Hoag also served on the Compensation Committee until Mr. Döpfner’s appointment to the Compensation Committee in March 2020. Each member of the Compensation Committee is independent in compliance with the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market as they pertain to Compensation Committee members. Each of the Compensation Committee members is also a non-employee director under Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act and an outside director under section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves all forms of compensation to be provided to our executive officers and directors. For a description of the role of the executive officers in recommending compensation and the role of any compensation consultants, please see the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below. The Compensation Committee held four meetings in 2020. Each member attended all the Compensation Committee meetings held in 2020.

The Report of the Compensation Committee is included in this Proxy Statement. In addition, the Board has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, which is available on our Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee of the Board consists of three non-employee directors: Mr. Barton, and Mses. Kilgore and Mather (Chair), each of whom is independent in compliance with the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market as they pertain to audit committee members. The Board has determined that Ms. Mather is an audit committee financial expert as defined by Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

35

LOGO

22          LOGO


The Audit Committee engages the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, reviews the Company’s financial controls, evaluates the scope of the annual audit, reviews audit results, consults with management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm prior to the presentation of financial statements to stockholders and, as appropriate, initiates inquiries into aspects of the Company’s internal accounting controls and financial affairs. The Audit Committee met seven times in 2020. Each member attended at least 75% of the Audit Committee meetings held in 2020.

The Report of the Audit Committee is included in this Proxy Statement. In addition, the Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which is available on our Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board consists of two non-employee directors, Messrs. Hoag (Chair) and Smith. Ambassador Rice served on the Nominating and Governance Committee through her resignation date, January 20, 2021. Each director serving on the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews and approves candidates for election and to fill vacancies on the Board, including re-nominations of members whose terms are due to expire, and reviews and provides guidance to the Board on corporate governance matters. The Nominating and Governance Committee met two times in 2020. Each member attended all the Nominating and Governance Committee meetings held in 2020, other than Mr. Smith who did not attend one meeting.

The Board has adopted a written charter for the Nominating and Governance Committee, which is available on our investor relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

None of our executive officers serves on the board of directors or compensation committee of a company that has an executive officer that serves on our Board or Compensation Committee. No member of our Board is an executive officer of a company in which one of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of that company.

In 2020, the Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Belmer, Döpfner (from March 2020), Haley, Hoag (through March 2020) and Ms. Sweeney, none of whom is currently or was formerly an officer or employee of the Company. None of Messrs. Belmer, Döpfner, Haley, or Hoag or Ms. Sweeney had a relationship with the Company that required disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. In addition to Messrs. Belmer, Döpfner, Haley, and Hoag and Ms. Sweeney, our Co-Chief Executive Officer, Reed Hastings, and Chief Talent Officer participated in the executive compensation process for the year ended December 31, 2020 as described below in the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

POLICY REGARDING DIRECTOR ATTENDANCE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Our policy regarding directors’ attendance at the annual meetings of stockholders and their attendance record at last year’s annual meeting of stockholders can be found on our Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          23


THE BOARD’S LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

The Board combines the role of Chairman and Chief Executive. While the Board reassesses maintaining the combined role from time to time, the Board believes that Mr. Hastings, a Co-Chief Executive Officer, is best situated to serve as Chairman because he is the director most familiar with our business and industry and is therefore best able to identify the strategic priorities to be discussed by the Board. The Board also believes that combining the role of Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer facilitates information flow between management and the Board and fosters strategic development and execution. The Board has appointed Jay Hoag as its lead independent director. As lead independent director, Mr. Hoag’s responsibilities include:

coordinating the activities of the independent directors, and authorization to call meetings of the independent directors;

coordinating with the Co-Chief Executive Officers and corporate secretary to set the agenda for Board meetings, soliciting and taking into account suggestions from other members of the Board;

chairing executive sessions of the independent directors;

providing feedback and perspective to the Co-Chief Executive Officers about discussions among the independent directors;

helping facilitate communication among the Co-Chief Executive Officers and the independent directors;

presiding at Board meetings where the Chair is not present; and

performing other duties assigned from time to time by the Board.

In addition, the Board maintains effective independent oversight through a number of governance practices, including, open and direct communication with management, input on meeting agendas, annual performance evaluations and regular executive sessions.

How to Communicate with Us

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

We provide a process for stockholders to send communications to the Board through the email address board@netflix.com. Information regarding stockholder communications with the Board can be found on the Company’s Investor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx.

LOGO

24          LOGO


How We are Paid

Since 2015, none of our directors receive cash for services they provide as directors or members of Board committees but may be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses for attending Board and Board committee meetings. Each non-employee director receives stock options pursuant to the Director Equity Compensation Plan. The Director Equity Compensation Plan provides for a monthly grant of stock options to each non-employee director of the Company in consideration for services provided to us and subject to the terms and conditions of our equity compensation plans.

We believe that for our company, compensating directors only with options is appropriate and creates the right incentives and long-term value alignment with stockholders. Without long-term value creation, directors are not compensated as the intrinsic value of options on dates of grant is zero.

The actual number of options granted each month to each of our directors is determined by the following formula: $25,000 / ([fair market value on the date of grant] x 0.40). Each monthly grant is made on the first trading day of the month, is fully vested upon grant and is exercisable at a strike price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. The table below sets forth information concerning the compensation of our non-employee directors during 2020.

In each of 2018 and 2019, Compensia advised the Board on our compensation program for our Board for the upcoming year, based on a comparison against our peer group’s board compensation programs and other compensation-related developments. The prior time Compensia reviewed our Board’s compensation program was in 2015, and we adjusted our Board’s compensation program in 2016. We have not made any changes to the compensation program for our Board since then.

Name

  

Option Awards

($)(1)

   

Total

($)

 

Richard N. Barton

   376,943        376,943(4) 

Rodolphe Belmer

   377,175        377,175(5) 

Mathias Döpfner

   377,201        377,201(6) 

Timothy M. Haley

   376,943        376,943(7) 

Jay C. Hoag

   376,943        376,943(8) 

Leslie Kilgore

   376,943        376,943(9) 

Strive Masiyiwa(2)

   —         

Ann Mather

   376,943        376,943(10) 

Susan E. Rice(3)

   377,017        377,017(11) 

Bradford L. Smith

   376,943        376,943(12) 

Anne M. Sweeney

   376,943        376,943(13) 

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          25


(1)common shares that are directly held by Orange Investor, L.P. (“Orange Investor”), (v) 172,704 common shares that are directly held by Orange Investor (A), L.P. (“Orange Investor (A)”), (vi) 39,777 common shares that are directly held by Orange Investor (B), L.P. (“Orange Investor (B)”), (vii) 47,085 common shares that are directly held by Orange (MF) Investor, L.P. (“Orange Investor (MF)”), (viii)

Option awards reflect the monthly grant of stock options to each non-employee director on the dates and at the aggregate grant date fair values computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 as shown below. Only options to purchase 49,741 commonwhole shares are granted with any remaining amount of the grant value carried over to the next monthly grant. The differences in option award values for each of Messrs. Belmer and Döpfner and Ambassador Rice reflect the different carryover amounts relating to the appointment month for each director. For a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation reflected in the Option Awards column, refer to Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on January 28, 2021.

Grant Date

Fair Value
($)

1/2/2020

29,336  

2/3/2020

29,485  

3/2/2020

29,407  

4/1/2020

31,573  

5/1/2020

31,800  

6/1/2020

31,752  

7/1/2020

32,038  

8/3/2020

32,381  

9/1/2020

32,127  

10/1/2020

32,261  

11/2/2020

32,618  

12/1/2020

32,166  

(2)

Mr. Strive Masiyiwa was appointed to the Board on December 16, 2020 and did not receive a prorated grant of stock options.

(3)

Ambassador Susan Rice served on the Board through January 20, 2021.

(4)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Jay C. Hoag, (ix) 421,836 common sharesMr. Barton at December 31, 2020 was 31,411.

(5)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by the Hoag Family Trust U/A Dtd 8/2/94 (the “Hoag Family Trust”), and (x) 80,755 common sharesMr. Belmer at December 31, 2020 was 4,078.

(6)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Hamilton Investments Limited Partnership (“Hamilton Investments”).Mr. Döpfner at December 31, 2020 was 4,654.

(7)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Haley at December 31, 2020 was 37,361.

(8)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Hoag at December 31, 2020 was 34,162.

(9)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Kilgore at December 31, 2020 was 11,240.

(10)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Mather at December 31, 2020 was 16,401.

(11)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Rice at December 31, 2020 was 4,426.

(12)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Smith at December 31, 2020 was 23,407.

(13)

Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Sweeney at December 31, 2020 was 8,240.

Jay C. Hoag

LOGO

26          LOGO


Certain Relationships and eight other individuals (the “Class A Directors”) are Class A Directors of Technology Crossover Management VII, Ltd. (“Management VII”) and limited partners of Technology Crossover Management VII, L.P. (“TCM VII”) and Member Fund. Management VII is the general partner of TCM VII, which is the general partner of TCV VII and TCV VII (A). Management VII is also a general partner of Member Fund. The Class A Directors of Management VII and TCM VII may be deemed to beneficially own the securities held by TCV VII, TCV VII (A) and Member Fund, but

Related Transactions

AGREEMENTS WITH DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. These agreements require us to indemnify such individuals, to the Classfullest extent permitted by Delaware law, for certain liabilities to which they may become subject as a result of their affiliation with us.

PROCEDURES FOR APPROVAL OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

We have a written policy concerning the review and approval of related party transactions. Potential related party transactions are identified through an internal review process that includes a review of payments made in connection with transactions in which related persons may have had a direct or indirect material interest. Those transactions that are determined to be related party transactions under Item 404 of Regulation S-K are submitted for review by the Audit Committee for approval and to conduct a conflicts-of-interest analysis. The individual identified as the “related party” may not participate in any review or analysis of the related party transaction.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          27


Proposal 2

Our Auditors

Ratification of

Appointment of

Independent Registered

Public Accounting Firm

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY

RECOMMENDS THAT THE

STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT

OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS

THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING

FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING

DECEMBER 31, 2021

LOGO

LOGO


The Audit Committee of the Board has selected Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”), an independent registered public accounting firm, to audit the financial statements of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2021. We are submitting its selection of Ernst & Young for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. A Directors, Management VIIrepresentative of Ernst & Young is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement and TCM VII disclaim beneficial ownershipis expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions. Ernst & Young has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since March 21, 2012. Neither applicable law nor our bylaws require that stockholders ratify the selection of Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firm. However, we are submitting the selection of Ernst & Young to stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If stockholders do not ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain Ernst & Young. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, at its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the year if they determine that such securities excepta change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

During 2020 and 2019, fees for services provided by Ernst & Young was as follows (in thousands):

  

 

  2020   2019 

Audit Fees

  $5,351  $4,936

Audit-Related Fees

   70    

Tax Fees

   2,096   2,927

Total

  $7,517  $7,863

Audit Fees include amounts related to the audit of our annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, and quarterly review of the financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Audit fees also include amounts related to accounting consultations and services rendered in connection with the Company’s issuance of senior notes in 2020 and 2019, respectively, as well as fees for statutory audit filings.

Audit-Related Fees include fees related to assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, including attestation services that are not required by statute or regulation.

Tax Fees include fees billed for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services.

There were no other fees billed by Ernst & Young for services rendered to us, other than the services described above, in 2020 and 2019.

The Audit Committee has determined that the rendering of non-audit services by Ernst & Young was compatible with maintaining their independence.

POLICY ON AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL OF AUDIT AND PERMISSIBLE NON-AUDIT SERVICES OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year, and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of their pecuniary interest therein.services provided by the independent registered

Mr. Hoag and seven other individuals are Class A Directors of Technology Crossover Management VIII, Ltd. (“Management VIII”) and a limited partners of Technology Crossover Management VIII, L.P. (“TCM VIII”). Management VIII is the sole general partner of TCM VIII, which

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          29


public accounting firm in turn is the sole general partner of TCV VIII, L.P., which in turn is the sole member of Orange Investor GP, LLC (“Orange GP”), which in turn is the sole general partner of Orange Investor, Orange (A) Investor, Orange (B) Investor, and Orange (MF) Investor. The Class A Directors of Management VIII and TCM VIII may be deemed to beneficially own the shares held by Orange Investor, Orange (A) Investor, Orange (B) Investor, and Orange (MF) Investor but disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of their pecuniary interest therein. The shares held by Orange Investor, Orange (A) Investor, Orange (B) Investor, and Orange (MF) Investor are also pledged as collateral for a third party debt facility.

Mr. Hoag has the sole power to dispose and direct the disposition of the options and any shares issuable upon exercise of the options,accordance with this pre-approval, and the sole powerfees for the services performed to directdate. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. During 2020, services provided by Ernst & Young were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with this policy.

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of the sharesmajority of common stockthe Votes Cast is required for ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021. The vote is an advisory vote, and therefore not binding.

Netflix Recommendation

LOGO

The Board unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021.

LOGO

30          LOGO


Report of the Audit Committee

of the Board

The Audit Committee engages and supervises the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. Management has the primary responsibility for the preparation of financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 with management, including a discussion of the quality of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments made by management and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Audit Committee reviewed with Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst��& Young”), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, who is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, its judgments as to the quality of the Company’s accounting principles and the other matters required to be received upon exercisediscussed with the Audit Committee under the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, including the matters required by Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young its independence from management and the Company, including the written disclosures and the letter regarding its independence as required by PCAOB Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence.

The Audit Committee also reviewed the fees paid to Ernst & Young during the year ended December 31, 2020 for audit and non-audit services, which fees are described under the heading “Principal Accountant Fees and Services.” The Audit Committee has determined that the rendering of all non-audit services by Ernst & Young were compatible with maintaining its independence.

The Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young the overall scope and plans for its audit. The Audit Committee met with Ernst & Young, with and without management present, to discuss the results of its examinations, its evaluations of the options. However, with respectCompany’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the options, Mr. Hoag has transferred to TCV VII Management, L.L.C. (“TCV VII Management”)Board that the audited financial statements be included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, for filing with the Securities and TCV VIII Management, L.L.C. (“TCV VIII Management”) 100%Exchange Commission.

Audit Committee of the pecuniary interest in such options and any shares to be issued upon exercise of such options. Mr. Hoag is a member of TCV VII Management and TCV VIII Management but disclaims beneficial ownership of such options and any shares to be received upon exercise of such options except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.Board

Mr. Hoag is a trustee of the Hoag Family Trust and may be deemed to have the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of the shares held by the Hoag Family Trust. Mr. Hoag disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.Richard N. Barton

Mr. Hoag is the sole general partner and a limited partner of Hamilton Investments and may be deemed to have the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of the shares held by Hamilton Investments. Mr. Hoag disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.Leslie Kilgore

Ann Mather

 

36LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          31


LOGO


LOGO

OUR COMPANY                     

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS                     


Our executive officers as of April 23, 2021 are as follows:

Executive Officers

Position

Reed Hastings

60Co-Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chairman of the Board

David Hyman

55Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

Jessica Neal(1)

44Chief Talent Officer

Spencer Neumann

51Chief Financial Officer

Greg Peters

50Chief Operating Officer and Chief Product Officer

Bozoma Saint John

44Chief Marketing Officer

Ted Sarandos

56Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Content Officer

Rachel Whetstone

53Chief Communications Officer

For more information about Messrs. Hastings and Sarandos, see “Proposal One: Our Board of Directors—Election of Directors—Who We Are.” Information about our other executive officers is set forth below:

LOGO     

DAVID HYMAN

CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER

AGE: 55

About:

As Chief Legal Officer, David is responsible for all legal and public policy matters for the Company. He also serves as the Company’s Secretary.

Also...

David practiced law at Morrison & Foerster in San Francisco and Arent Fox in Washington, DC. He earned his JD and Bachelor’s degrees from the University of Virginia.

Career Snapshot:

•  Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Netflix (since 2002)

Prior:

•  General Counsel of Webvan, an online internet retailer

LOGO     

JESSICA NEAL

CHIEF TALENT OFFICER

AGE: 44

About:

Jessica leads the team that maintains the Company’s unique corporate culture, hires new talent and keeps the organization lean and flexible despite enormous growth.

Also...

Jessica is a Netflix veteran, starting at the company in 2006 when DVD was king and streaming just a dream, and has been heavily involved in improving the Netflix culture as the company grew. After roles at Coursera and Scopley, she rejoined the Netflix team in her current role. Jessica joined the JFrog board in 2020 and served as a board member for the Association of Talent Development from 2016 to 2019.

Career Snapshot:

•  Chief Talent Officer at Netflix (since 2017)

Prior:

•  Chief People Officer at Scopely, a leading player in the mobile gaming industry (2015-2017)

•  Head of Human Resources at Coursera, which provides online access to the world’s best university courses

(1)

Ms. Neal will be departing from the Company in May 2021.

LOGO

34          LOGO


8.Includes options
LOGO       

SPENCER NEUMANN

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

AGE: 51

About:

Spencer was named CFO of Netflix in January of 2019, utilizing his finance, strategy, and accounting experience in media, entertainment and service oriented companies to purchase 844,641 shares.

9.Includes optionscontinue to purchase 497,699 shares.
10.Includes options to purchase 180,301 shares.
11.Includes options to purchase 210,815 shares.
12.Includes options to purchase 194,838 shares.
13.Includes options to purchase 102,276 shares. Mr. Battlebuild on the company’s track record of success and innovation.

Also...

Spencer also worked at the private equity firms of Providence Equity Partners and Summit Partners. Additional positions at The Walt Disney Company, which he initially joined in 1992, included executive vice president of the ABC Televisions Network and CFO of the Walt Disney Internet Group. He is a trusteemember of the A. George Battle 2012 Separate Property Trust,national board of directors of Make-A-Wish America. Spencer holds both a B.A. in economics and an M.B.A. from Harvard University.

Career Snapshot:

•  CFO of Netflix (since 2019)

Prior:

•  CFO of Activision Blizzard, a video gaming company (2017-2019)

•  CFO and executive vice president of Global Guest Experience of Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, among other positions at the Walt Disney Company, a diversified multinational media and entertainment company (2012-2017)

LOGO       

GREG PETERS

CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER AND CHIEF PRODUCT OFFICER

AGE: 50

About:

As Chief Operating Officer and Chief Product Officer, Greg oversees global operations and leads the product team, which isdesigns, builds and optimizes the holderNetflix experience including applications and user interfaces.

Also...

Greg previously held positions at digital entertainment software provider, Mediabolic Inc., Red Hat Network, the provider of 56,000Linux and Open Source technology, and online vendor Wine.com. He holds a degree in physics and astronomy from Yale University. Greg joined the board of the Company’s shares.

14.Includes options to purchase 60,866 shares. Mr. Barton is2U, Inc., a trusteeglobal leader in education technology, in March of the Barton Family Foundation, which is the holder2018.

Career Snapshot:

•  Chief Operating Officer (since July 2020) and Chief Product Officer of 20,000Netflix (since 2017)

Prior:

•  International Development Officer of the Company’s shares.

15.Includes options to purchase 65,687 shares.
16.Includes options to purchase 16,393 shares.
17.Includes options to purchase 36,735 shares.
18.Includes options to purchase 17,867 shares.
19.Includes options to purchase 17,867 shares.
20.Includes options to purchase 673 shares.
21.Includes options to purchase 222 shares.
22.Includes, without duplication, the sharesNetflix (2015-2017)

•  Chief Streaming and options listed in footnotes (6) through (21) above.Partnerships Officer of Netflix

•  Senior Vice President of consumer electronics products for Macrovision Solutions Corp. (later renamed Rovi Corporation), a technology company

 

37LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          35


LOGO   

BOZOMA SAINT JOHN

CHIEF MARKETING OFFICER

AGE: 44

About:

Bozoma was appointed Chief Marketing Officer in August 2020.

Also...

Bozoma has been recognized for her breakthrough work by both the industry and her peers, having been inducted into the American Advertising Federation Hall of Achievement in 2014. Additionally, Bozoma serves on the boards of Girls Who Code and Vital Voices and in March 2017, she was named as a Henry Crown Fellow by the Aspen Institute. She holds a BA in English and African American Studies from Wesleyan University.

Career Snapshot:

•  Chief Marketing Officer of Netflix (since August 2020)

Prior:

•  Chief Marketing Officer of Endeavor, a talent and media agency (2018-2020)

•  Chief Brand Officer at Uber, a multinational ride-sharing company (2017-2018)

•  Head of Global Consumer Marketing, Apple Music & iTunes (2014-2017)

LOGO   

RACHEL WHETSTONE

CHIEF COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER

AGE: 53

About:

Rachel leads our public relations globally.

Also...

Rachel has spent the last 20 years working on communications and policy issues for US companies. She also serves as a director of Udacity. Rachel is a graduate of Bristol University and spent the first half of her career working as a policy advisor for the UK Conservative Party.

Career Snapshot:

•  Chief Communications Officer at Netflix (since 2018)

Prior:

•  Vice President of Communications at Facebook, a social media and technology company (2017-2018)

•  Senior Vice President of Communications & Public Policy at Uber, a multinational ride-sharing company (2015-2017)

•  Senior Vice President of Communications & Public Policy at Google, an internet-related services and products company (2005-2015)

There are no family relationships among any of our directors, nominees for director and executive officers.

LOGO

36          LOGO


Proposal 3

Our Pay

Advisory Approval

of Executive Officer

Compensation

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY

RECOMMENDS THAT THE

STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL

OF OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICER

COMPENSATION DISCLOSED IN

THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

LOGO

LOGO


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISAs required by section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), we are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to cast a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC (also referred to as “say-on-pay”).

PhilosophyWe currently hold our advisory say-on-pay vote every year. Stockholders will have an opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the frequency of say-on-pay votes at least every six years. We currently expect that the next advisory vote on the frequency of the say-on-pay votes will occur at the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.

The Company’sAs described in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we have adopted an executive compensation philosophy is premised on the Company’s desiredesigned to attract and retain outstanding performers. Our compensation practices are guided by market rates and tailored to account for the specific needs and responsibilities of the particular position, as well as the performance and unique qualifications of the individual employee, rather than by seniority or overall Company performance.

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of the majority of the Votes Cast is required to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers disclosed in this Proxy Statement. The vote is an advisory vote, and therefore not binding.

Netflix Recommendation

LOGO

The Board unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote “FOR” approval of our executive officer compensation disclosed in this Proxy Statement.

LOGO

38          LOGO


LOGO

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION                    

AND ANALYSIS                     


A MESSAGE FROM THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHAIR

2020 presented unprecedented challenges, with effects of the COVID-19 pandemic felt around the world by nearly every business. Our executive officers demonstrated strong leadership in navigating the pandemic, acting quickly to implement measures to care for the health and safety of our employees, to continue providing great content for our members, and to promote the financial strength of our company for our stockholders.

In response to stockholder feedback, we aimed to more clearly explain our compensation program in our compensation disclosures last year and updated our insider trading policy to prohibit certain hedging and pledging transactions. The Board, alongside management, continued to actively engage with stockholders throughout 2020 to ensure we are addressing relevant questions and concerns, to seek input, and to provide perspective on our policies and practices. We discussed a broad spectrum of topics, including environmental, social and governance matters; diversity, equity and inclusion; and our executive compensation program. We have heard from a number of our stockholders that the enhanced disclosures and information have been helpful to stockholders and resulted in a better understanding of our compensation program.

The Board and Compensation Committee considered the input from our stockholders and the results of our annual Say-on-Pay vote and continue to strongly believe that our compensation program’s design is a significant contributor to Netflix’s success and is highly aligned with stockholder interests. Therefore, we are not making material changes to the executive compensation program for 2021. The Compensation Committee will continue to explore ways that we can implement changes to the program desired by some stockholders while preserving the program’s general design and value to Netflix and our stockholders. We will also continue to provide transparent disclosures about our compensation program and to solicit input from our stockholders.

Thank you for being a stockholder and joining us on this journey to change the way people are entertained. We appreciate your commitment to Netflix and we will continue to endeavor to make your commitment worthwhile.

Tim Haley

Compensation Committee Chairperson

OUR COMPANY AND 2020 PERFORMANCE

Netflix is one of the world’s leading entertainment services with approximately 208 million paid memberships in over 190 countries. We launched our streaming service in 2007, and have since added increasing amounts of content that enable consumers to enjoy entertainment directly on their internet-connected screens. Our content is increasingly exclusive and curated and includes our own original programming.

We believe that Netflix remains a growth venture, even though we have been a public company for nearly 20 years. We added a record 37 million paid memberships in 2020, representing an increase of 31% over the prior year and achieved approximately $25 billion in revenue, representing 24% year-over-year growth. Our profitability also improved, with operating income rising 76% year over year while operating margins increased from 13% to 18%. We manage our business for the long term with a focus on stockholder value creation. Consistent with this approach, our annualized total stockholder return since our initial public offering in 2002 through December 31, 2020 was 40%.

In 2020, we continued to invest heavily in content to great success. As noted in our investor letters, some of our big hits included new series like Tiger King: Murder, Mayhem and Madness, The Queen’s Gambit, and Bridgerton. Season four of the critically acclaimed The Crown was its biggest season so far and new seasons of Ozark and La Casa de Papel (aka, Money Heist) continued to entertain our members. Original films premiered a wide variety of successes such as The Old Guard, Extraction, and The Midnight Sky. We continued to expand our local language

LOGO

40          LOGO


content, which was not only impactful in the home country but was enjoyed around the globe. As a testament to the quality of our programming, our titles were nominated for 160 Emmys and an industry-leading 36 Academy Award nominations within the last year. We’re also proud to lead the industry in nominations at both the 2021 NAACP Image Awards (53 nominations) and the GLAAD Media Awards (26 nominations). We are also producing content from countries all over the world as we believe great stories can come from anywhere and can be enjoyed everywhere.

STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND THE 2020 SAY-ON-PAY VOTE RESULT

In 2020, 61.5% of voted shares approved the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. At the time of the vote in 2020, the Compensation Committee had already approved the design of our 2020 executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee reviewed these voting results, and in response, members of the Compensation Committee and management engaged with stockholders to solicit feedback regarding our compensation program.

In the fall of 2020, we invited stockholders representing approximately 47% of our shares outstanding to engage with us on a variety of issues, specifically including executive compensation. We held 10 virtual meetings in the fall of 2020 with stockholders representing approximately 25% of our common stock outstanding, including stockholders that did not support our 2020 vote. Members of the Board, accompanied by Company aimsrepresentatives as appropriate, participated in each of these conversations. We also held numerous engagement meetings earlier in 2020, prior to our 2020 annual meeting.

In addition to compensation matters, the discussions also focused on our approach to environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters; diversity, equity and inclusion; our response to the COVID-19 pandemic; and our dual CEO management structure. These meetings reconfirmed that ESG and diversity, equity and inclusion matters were increasingly top of mind for our investors. Investors expressed a desire to see improved disclosure on environmental and social matters, which the recent hire of our Sustainability Officer is intended to help address. We have also recently increased our disclosure about these topics partly in response to investor feedback by publishing an Inclusion Report in January 2021 along with our EEO-1 data and ESG reports. This and other ESG information is available on our Investor Relations website at ir.netflix.net.

While investors inquired about our dual CEO model and how it works for Netflix, none expressed that it was inappropriate for us. We explained that the dual CEO model formalized the prior working relationship between Reed and Ted and was an effective leadership model to further support our continued growth and international expansion. Stockholders gave us high marks for our response to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as our focus on employee well-being and our efforts to support the creative industry through our establishment of hardship funds. Regarding governance, investors understood our rationale for our governance structure, even if they disagreed with it.

The feedback on our compensation program was limited, with many investors understanding and supportive of our approach to compensation. While we did not hear thematic concerns about our compensation program during our meetings, one stockholder questioned some components of our compensation program, including the ability of our executives to allocate their compensation between cash and stock options.    

Our Compensation Committee considered stockholder feedback in its deliberations regarding 2021 compensation and will continue to consider feedback in ongoing executive compensation decisions.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          41


2020 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the compensation program for our Named Executive Officers. During 2020, these individuals were:

Reed Hastings, Co-Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chairman of the Board

Ted Sarandos, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Content Officer(1)

Spencer Neumann, Chief Financial Officer

Greg Peters, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Product Officer(1)

David Hyman, Chief Legal Officer

Rachel Whetstone, Chief Communications Officer

COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY

We aim to provide highly competitive compensation packages for all itsour key positions, including itsour Named Executive Officers. The Company’sOur compensation practices are guided by market rates andalso tailored to account for the specific needs and responsibilities of the particular position, as well as the performance and unique qualifications of the individual employee, rather than by seniority or overall Company performance. Individual compensation is nonetheless linked to Company performance by virtue of the stock options granted by the Company.we grant.

Determining Executive Compensation

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the compensation programs for the Company’s Named Executive Officers. During 2017, these individuals were:

Reed Hastings, Chief Executive Officer

David Wells, Chief Financial Officer

Greg Peters, Chief Product Officer

Ted Sarandos, Chief Content Officer

David Hyman, General Counsel and Secretary

Neil Hunt, former Chief Product Officer

Mr. Hunt’s employment with the Company terminated on June 23, 2017, but based on the compensation paid to him in 2017 by the Company, he is included as a Named Executive Officer. Mr. Peters was promoted to Chief Product Officer from International Development Officer effective July 2017, following Mr. Hunt’s departure.

In 2017, the Company’s compensation program for Named Executive Officers centered around three components: salary, stock options and performance-based bonuses. The compensation associated with each of these components was expressed in a dollar-denominated amount and was allocated among these components, as described below. For 2018, the Company will not offer performance-based bonuses and all cash compensation will be paid as salary

In determining the compensation for its Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee (A) reviews and considers the performance of each Named Executive Officer and (B) considers, for each Named Executive Officer, the estimated amount of compensation:

(i)the Company would be willing pay to retain that person;

(ii)the Company would have to pay to replace the person; and

(iii)the individual could otherwise command in the employment marketplace.

38


The Chief Executive Officer, in consultation with the Chief Talent Officer, reviews comparative data derived from market research and publicly available information for each of the Named Executive Officers1. The Chief Executive Officer then makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding compensation for each Named Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee reviews and discusses the information and then determines a dollar-denominated amount availableaims for allocation to the compensation components described above (“allocatable compensation”) for each Named Executive Officer, as it deems appropriate.program to be simple to understand and administer, to be transparent to both stockholders and executive officers, and to create a long-term alignment between our stockholders and our executive officers.

The Chief Executive Officer’sOur compensation is determinedpractices are evaluated by the Compensation Committee outside the presence of the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee’s decision regarding compensation for the Chief Executive Officer is based on the philosophy outlined above and includes a review of comparative data and consideration of the accomplishments of the Chief Executive Officer in developing the business strategy for the Company, the performance of the Company relative to this strategy and his ability to attract and retain senior management. In establishing the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, the Compensation Committee is also mindful of the results of the stockholder’s Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation for the prior year.

In determining compensation for 2017, the Compensation Committee retained Compensia, a management consulting firm providing executive compensation advisory services, to help the Committee assess the competitiveness of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, obtain a general understanding of chief executive compensation practices in the marketplace and as a resource for its deliberations concerning the Chief Executive Officer’s specific compensation. The Compensation Committee did not use the information from Compensia, however, with the goal of setting a specific target compensation level based upon percentiles derived from such other companies. In 2017, the Compensation Committee worked with Compensia in determining an appropriate peer group of companies. The peer group reflected the Company’s continued orientation toward media companies and consumer-facing technology companies. The peer group for 2017 was comprised of the following companies: Activision Blizzard, Adobe Systems, AMC Networks, CBS, Discovery Communications, Dolby Laboratories, eBay, Electronic Arts, Lions Gate Entertainment, PayPal Holdings, salesforce.com, Scripps Networks Interactive, Sirius XM Holdings, The Priceline Group, Time Warner, Twenty-first Century Fox, Twitter, Viacom, Walt Disney and Workday. For 2018, the Compensation Committee again worked with Compensia to determine the appropriate peer group of companies for the Company. The peer group for 2018 is comprised of the following companies: Activision Blizzard, Adobe Systems, AMC Networks, CBS, Discovery Communications, DISH Network, eBay, Electronic Arts, Lions Gate Entertainment, PayPal Holdings, salesforce.com, Scripps Networks Interactive, Sirius XM Holdings, The Priceline Group, Time Warner, Twenty-first Century Fox, Twitter, Viacom, Walt Disney and Workday. Total fees paid to Compensia were less than $120,000 in each year.

With respect to each of the Named Executive Officers, in determining compensation, the Compensation Committee considered the Company’s compensation philosophy as outlined above, comparative market data and specific factors relative to each Named Executive Officer’s responsibilities and performance. The Company does not specifically benchmark compensation for its Named Executive Officers in terms of picking a particular percentile relative to other people with similar titles at peer group companies. The Company believes that many subjective factors unique to each Named Executive Officer’s responsibilities and performance are not adequately reflected or otherwise accounted for in a percentile-based compensation determination.

1In 2017, the Chief Talent Officer position was vacant at the time Named Executive Officer compensation was determined.

39


In determining Mr. Hunt’s 2017 compensation, the Committee considered his responsibility for the development and deployment of the Company’s increasing engineering systems and product offerings across the globe and in multiple languages, as well as the continued market demand for engineering talent. In determining Mr. Sarandos’s 2017 compensation, the Committee considered his role in obtaining globally relevant content for the Company’s international expansion, his significant contributions to the Company’s original content strategy and buildout of the infrastructure to support that strategy, and the market demand for high-level content programming talent. In determining Mr. Wells’s 2017 compensation, the Committee considered his performance in managing the finance organization as the Company’s business continues to evolve and grow internationally. In determining Mr. Peters’s 2017 compensation, the Committee considered his performance in maintaining and expanding our business operations across the globe, in particular Japan and markets in the Asia-Pacific region and his responsibilities in assisting the Company with its consumer electronic and network operator relationships. When Mr. Peters became Chief Product Officer in July 2017, the Committee also considered his responsibility for the development and deployment of the Company’s increasing engineering systems and product offerings across the globe and in multiple languages, as well as the continued market demand for engineering talent, and increased his compensation accordingly. In determining Mr. Hyman’s 2017 total compensation, the Committee considered his performance in managing and developing a global legal and public policy function.

The Company’s compensation practices are evaluated on an ongoing basis to determine whether they are appropriate to attract, retain and reward outstanding performers. Such evaluations may result in refinements to the compensation program, including changes in how compensation is determined and awarded.

COMPENSATION PROGRAM OVERVIEW

The key elements of our compensation program applicable to the majority of our employees, including our Named Executive Officers, and how they align with our compensation philosophy are as follows:

Only two pay components, salary and stock options. Our compensation program consists of only base salary and stock options. It is the same program for our executive officers as it is for the majority of our employees. We use stock options as we believe that they correlate compensation with stockholder returns, and encourage a long-term perspective, especially given how we’ve designed the stock option allocation portion of our program in which employees can allocate cash compensation toward stock options. Importantly, as described below, our stock price needs to appreciate 40% before the employee is better off allocating cash to stock options. We do not use performance-based bonuses as we believe that they tend to incentivize specific, typically short-term focused behavior rather than encourage long-term stockholder value creation.

Personal Choice. We set a dollar-denominated annual compensation amount for each eligible employee (“allocatable compensation”) who can then choose to allocate any portion of that compensation amount toward

(1)

Effective July 14, 2020, Mr. Sarandos was appointed as Co-Chief Executive Officer, in addition to his role as Chief Content Officer, and Mr. Peters was appointed as Chief Operating Officer, in addition to his role as Chief Product Officer. Mr. Sarandos was also appointed to the Board as a Class III director effective July 14, 2020. Neither Mr. Sarandos nor Mr. Peters received an increase in compensation in connection with these appointments.

LOGO

42          LOGO


stock options. We believe that providing choice and flexibility helps us better compete for talent as the individual employee can customize their compensation to fit varying lifestyle needs.

Monthly Grants. We grant stock options on the first trading day of each month with the number of options granted based on the closing stock price on that trading day (see formula below). We believe granting options monthly produces a dollar cost averaging effect—unlike annual grants which are more subject to the vagaries of the market—which helps reduce the potential negative impacts with employee distraction and morale.

Minimum stock option grants. Through 2020, in addition to the choice described above, each eligible employee, including executive officers, was awarded a minimum annual stock option allowance (generally based upon 5% of their total allocatable compensation). Beginning in 2021, in an effort to maximize flexibility and personal choice for our employees, the minimum option grants have been eliminated for most employees and the value has been added to the employee’s total allocatable compensation.

Objective and Transparent Stock Option Grant Formula. The number of monthly stock options granted is determined by the following formula:

(the amount of an employee’s total

annual stock option allocation/12)

(the closing trading price of a share

of our stock on the grant date x 0.40)

For example:

If our stock price is $500 on the date of grant and the recipient allocated $2,000 per month of their allocatable compensation to stock options, the recipient would receive 10 stock options with an exercise price of $500.

$2000

 =   

2000

 = 

10 options with an

exercise price of $500.

$500*0.40 200

The stock price would need to rise to $700 (40% appreciation from $500) for the recipient to earn back the $2,000 of cash they traded for the options:

$700 - $500 = $200 x 10 shares = $2,000

Anything below a 40% appreciation in the stock means that the employee would have been better off electing cash. We believe that this structure and the corresponding trade-off of current cash compensation for longer-term appreciation potential significantly aligns our employee interest with that of our stockholders.

In 2020, each Named Executive Officer elected to allocate a portion of their cash compensation to our stock option program. Reed Hastings, our Co-Chief Executive Officer allocated 98% of his cash compensation toward our stock option program, Ted Sarandos, our Co-Chief Executive Officer allocated 39% of his cash compensation toward our stock option program, and the average election across our Named Executive Officers was 43%.

Vested 10-year Stock Options. We grant fully vested 10-year stock options, which means that employees have 10 years from the date of grant to exercise their options. We believe a 10-year option life is important to encourage participation in the equity portion of our compensation program and reinforce a long-term focus. As the options must increase by 40% from the date of grant before they break even with the traded cash, as a practical matter, it takes time before it is worthwhile for an employee to exercise their vested options. We do not believe that vesting over a certain period of time and forced exercise upon termination creates a healthy environment or secures a high-performing workforce. We want our employees to stay at Netflix because they are

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          43


passionate about their roles and want to help Netflix be successful in the long run, rather than merely waiting for their options to vest.

DETERMINING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION MAGNITUDE

We aim to pay all employees at the top of their personal market. We believe this helps us attract and retain the most talented employees from around the globe. To establish the top of personal market for each of our Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee (A) reviews and considers the performance of each Named Executive Officer and (B) considers, for each Named Executive Officer, the estimated amount of compensation:

i.

we would be willing to pay to retain that person;

ii.

we would have to pay to replace the person; and

iii.

the individual could otherwise command in the employment marketplace.

Role of executive officers

Each of our Co-Chief Executive Officers, in consultation with our Chief Talent Officer, reviews comparative data derived from publicly available market compensation information for each of the other Named Executive Officers. The Co-Chief Executive Officers then make a recommendation to the Compensation Committee regarding compensation for each other Named Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee reviews and discusses this information and the recommendation by the Co-Chief Executive Officers, and then determines a dollar-denominated amount available for allocation to salary and stock options for each such Named Executive Officer, as it deems appropriate. The Compensation Committee also approves the stock option allocation amount for each Named Executive Officer.

Our Co-Chief Executive Officers’ compensation is determined by the Compensation Committee outside the presence of the Co-Chief Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee’s decision regarding compensation for the Co-Chief Executive Officers is based on the philosophy described above. It includes a review of comparative data, including the compensation paid by the companies in our compensation peer group to their chief executive officers and consideration of the accomplishments of the Co-Chief Executive Officers in developing the business strategy for the Company, the Company’s performance against this strategy, and the Co-Chief Executive Officers’ ability to attract and retain senior management. In establishing each Co-Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, the Compensation Committee is also mindful of the results of the Say-on-Pay vote for the prior year.

Compensation for any given year is generally established at the end of the prior year. The 2020 compensation for our Named Executive Officers was determined at the end of 2019, and therefore, only Mr. Hastings, the sole Chief Executive Officer at the time, participated in the 2020 compensation determinations of the other Named Executive Officers as described above.

Role of the compensation consultant

In determining compensation for 2020, the Compensation Committee retained Compensia, Inc. (“Compensia”) a national compensation consulting firm to advise on executive and director compensation matters. Compensia provided various services to the Compensation Committee, including the review, analysis and update of our compensation peer group; the review and analysis of our Named Executive Officer compensation against competitive market data based on the companies in our compensation peer group; the review and analysis of our non-employee director compensation; advice on our equity plans and support on other ad hoc matters.

LOGO

44          LOGO


Peer group and benchmarking

The Compensation Committee works with Compensia in determining an appropriate peer group of companies each year. In changes from 2019, Microsoft and Lions Gate Entertainment were removed for size (too large and too small, respectively) and Facebook was added consistent with Netflix’s continued growth, to better align Netflix with the median revenue and market capitalization of the peer group, and to continue to prioritize media and consumer-facing companies. Twenty-first Century Fox was removed due to its acquisition by Walt Disney. The compensation peer group for 2020 was composed of the following companies:

2020 Netflix Peer Group

Activision Blizzard

Facebook

Adobe Systems

Intuit

Booking Holdings

Oracle

CBS

PayPal Holdings

Charter Communications

salesforce.com

Comcast

Sirius XM Holdings

Discovery Communications

Viacom

DISH Network

VMWare

eBay

Walt Disney

Electronic Arts

With respect to each of our Named Executive Officers, in determining compensation, the Compensation Committee considered our compensation philosophy as described above, comparative market data and specific factors relative to each Named Executive Officer’s responsibilities and performance. We do not specifically benchmark compensation for our Named Executive Officers in terms of picking a particular percentile relative to other individuals with similar titles at peer group companies. The Compensation Committee believes that many subjective factors unique to each Named Executive Officer’s responsibilities and performance are not adequately reflected or otherwise accounted for in a percentile-based compensation determination.

ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We use only salary and stock options, augmented by very limited perquisites, to compensate our Named Executive Officers. Across the broader employee base, we also use salary and stock options as our key compensation components to remain competitive within the marketplace. Similarly situated companies typically offer employees an equity component as part of their overall compensation package and as such, we believe it is important to provide this opportunity to our employees, including our Named Executive Officers. By permitting employees to request a customized combination of salary and stock options, we endeavor to tailor individuals’ compensation to their personal compensation preferences and thereby offer a more compelling compensation package.

Cash Compensation

As described above, our compensation program offers our Named Executive Officers the opportunity to select the proportion of cash and equity compensation they receive each year. While our Named Executive Officers generally have elected to receive a significant portion of their compensation in equity, the remaining compensation is paid in cash in the form of salary.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          45


Stock Options

We believe that equity ownership, including stock and stock options, helps align the interest of our Named Executive Officers with those of our stockholders and links executive compensation to long-term company performance.

Furthermore, because the stock options are granted at the fair market value of our common stock on the date of the option grant and are not generally transferable, they are only of value to the recipient if the market value of our common stock increases after the date of grant, thereby directly linking compensation in the form of stock options to Company performance.

Making option grants on a monthly basis provides employees with a “dollar-cost averaging” approach to the price of their option grants. By granting options each month rather than on a less frequent basis, we believe it alleviates to a great extent the arbitrariness of option grant timing and the potential negative employee issues associated with “underwater” options.

Stock options are vested upon grant and can be exercised for up to ten years following grant regardless of employment status. We believe that the ten-year life of the options enhances their value for each employee and thereby encourages equity ownership in the Company, which is helpful in aligning employee and stockholder interests. We do not believe that staggered vesting of stock options or expiration of options closely following employment termination has a desirable impact on employee retention. Rather, we believe that creating and maintaining a high-performance culture and providing highly competitive compensation packages are the critical components for retaining employees, including our Named Executive Officers.

Empirically, stock options have proven to be an effective way of creating long-term alignment between executives and stockholders. Even though the options are vested upon grant, our Named Executive Officers often do not exercise their options for an extended period of time.

Other Components of Compensation

In 2020, each Named Executive Officer, like all our full-time employees, was eligible to receive an additional $15,000 in annual compensation that may be used to defray the cost of health care benefits previously paid by us. This amount was increased to $16,000 for 2021. Any portion of this allowance not utilized toward the cost of health care benefits will be paid as salary, up to a maximum of $5,000.

In addition to base salary and stock options, certain eligible U.S. employees, including our Named Executive Officers, have the opportunity to participate in our 401(k) matching program which enables them to receive a dollar-for-dollar Company match of up to 4% of his or her compensation to the 401(k) fund, subject to limitations under applicable law. Messrs. Neumann, Sarandos, and Hyman all participated in this program in 2020 and therefore we matched their 401(k) contributions as shown in the compensation tables of this Proxy Statement.

We also maintain a group term life insurance policy for all full-time employees, including our Named Executive Officers. We permit our Named Executive Officers and their family members and guests to use our corporate aircraft for personal use and consider amounts related to such travel to be a perquisite. Additionally, our Named Executive Officers are permitted to use a company-provided car service under certain circumstances. We also pay for residential security measures and services for certain Named Executive Officers when deemed necessary. All of these perquisites are reflected in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

LOGO

46          LOGO


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION IN 2020

Each year, we allow our Named Executive Officers to allocate their compensation between cash and stock options. Our Named Executive Officers continue to express their confidence in the Company and our growth strategy by electing to receive a substantial percentage of their compensation through at-risk stock option awards. These elections are made prior to the compensation year and are irrevocable. For 2020, the following elections were made by our Named Executive Officers:

Named Executive Officer

 

Allocatable

Compensation

($)(1)

 

Amount of Allocatable

Compensation Elected

to be received as

Stock Options

(%)(1)

 

Amount of Allocatable

Compensation Elected

to be received as

Cash Salary

(%)

Reed Hastings, Co-Chief Executive Officer, President, Chairman of the Board

   33,000,000   98.0   2.0

Ted Sarandos, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Content Officer

   33,000,000   39.4   60.6

Spencer Neumann, Chief Financial Officer

   11,000,000   45.0   55.0

Greg Peters, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Product Officer

   18,000,000   33.3   66.7

David Hyman, Chief Legal Officer

   9,000,000   38.9   61.1

Rachel Whetstone, Chief Communications Officer

   5,000,000   4.0   96.0

(1)

Excludes the minimum annual stock option allowance.

We also provided a minimum annual stock option allowance (generally equal to 5% of the Named Executive Officer’s allocatable compensation) in 2020, which is added to the amount allocated to stock options by the Named Executive Officer to arrive at the total annual stock option allocation. While the total annual stock option allocation is expressed in a dollar denomination, we use the total annual stock option allocation only to calculate the number of stock options to be granted. The total annual stock option allocation is not available to the employees as cash compensation, except where an employee who has allocated a portion of their compensation toward stock options receives severance payments and as otherwise set forth in our Amended and Restated Executive Severance and Retention Incentive Plan (the “Severance Plan”).

The compensation of our Named Executive Officers for 2020 was determined in 2019, prior to the global onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. In determining compensation for our Named Executive Officers for 2020, in consultation with Compensia, the Compensation Committee considered the philosophy described above, including comparative market data. In addition, the following factors were considered for each Named Executive Officer:

for Mr. Hastings, the Compensation Committee considered his accomplishments in continuing to develop and evolve the business strategy for the Company, the performance of the Company relative to this strategy and his ability to attract and retain senior management, and increased his allocatable compensation from $30,000,000 to $33,000,000 for 2020.

for Mr. Sarandos, consideration was given to his global stature as a leading media executive and his role in obtaining globally relevant content for the Company’s international expansion, his significant contributions to the Company’s original content strategy, the buildout of the infrastructure to support that strategy, and the market demand for high-level content programming talent. Mr. Sarandos’ allocatable compensation was increased from $30,000,000 to $33,000,000 for 2020. Mr. Sarandos’s allocatable compensation was not increased when he was promoted to Co-Chief Executive Officer in July 2020 and he also continues to retain his role as Chief Content Officer.

for Mr. Neumann, consideration was given to his experience in leading a financial organization in the media industry, as well as the increasing complexity of our financial reporting as we engage in original productions around the globe. Mr. Neumann’s allocatable compensation was increased from $9,524,000 to $11,000,000 for 2020.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          47


for Mr. Peters, consideration was given to his performance in developing and deploying our increasingly complex engineering systems to support our continued expansion into new jurisdictions and languages and new product offerings to enhance user experience, as well as the continued market demand for engineering talent. His allocatable compensation was increased from $16,000,000 to $18,000,000 for 2020. Mr. Peters’ allocatable compensation was not increased when he was promoted to Chief Operating Officer in July 2020 and he also continues to retain his role as Chief Product Officer.

for Mr. Hyman, consideration was given to his performance in managing and developing a global legal and public policy function, and his allocatable compensation was increased from $7,000,000 to $9,000,000 for 2020.

for Ms. Whetstone, consideration was given to her deep knowledge and international experience in leading global communications, as we expand our original content around the globe. Her allocatable compensation was increased from $3,500,000 to $5,000,000 for 2020.

Individual employee performance, including that of our Named Executive Officers, is also evaluated on an ongoing basis. To the extent such performance exceeds or falls short of the Company’sour performance values, the Companywe may take action that includes, in the case of star performers, promotions or increases in compensation or, in the case of under performers, demotion, a reduction in compensation or termination.

ElementsAfter considering the above, in 2020, the compensation components for our Named Executive Officers were as follows. Please see the Summary Compensation Table provided in this Proxy Statement for a complete description of the compensation of our Named Executive CompensationOfficers:

 

Name and Position

2020

Total Annual

Stock Option

Allocation,
with

1/12 granted

monthly

($)(1)

2020 Annual

Cash Salary

($)

Reed Hastings, Co-Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chairman of the Board

 34,000,000 650,000

Ted Sarandos, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Content Officer

 14,650,000 20,000,000

Spencer Neumann, Chief Financial Officer

 5,500,000 6,050,000

Greg Peters, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Product Officer

 6,900,000 12,000,000

David Hyman, Chief Legal Officer

 3,950,000 5,500,000

Rachel Whetstone, Chief Communications Officer

 450,000 4,800,000

In 2017, after

(1)

The dollar amounts set forth in this column are different than the amounts in the “Option Awards” column of the Summary Compensation Table because the amounts in this column are reflective of the total compensation amount attributable to stock option grants, rather than the accounting valuation which is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table. Includes the annual stock option allowance of 5% of allocatable compensation.

Method for determining the allocatable compensation for each Named Executive Officer by the method described above, such amount for each individual was divided into the three key components of salary, stock options and performance-based target bonuses. This allocation was made pursuant to the compensation preferences of each Named Executive Officer, who allocated compensation between cash and stock options; provided however, that the salary component for each Named Executive Officer could not exceed $1 million, except for Mr. Wells who was excluded from the applicable IRS regulations such that the $1 million ceiling on salary did not apply to him. Any amount in cash above $1 million that was not otherwise allocated by a Named Executive Officer to stock options was allocated to a target performance bonus pursuant to the performance-based bonus program (discussed below). The amount allocated to salary was considered cash compensation and paid through payroll during 2017 on abi-weekly basis. The performance-based bonus program was discontinued for 2018.

The amount allocated to stock options is referred to as themonthly stock option allocation. Starting in 2015, the Company also provides a minimum annual stock option allowance (equal to 5% of the Named Executive Officer’s allocatable compensation) which is added to the amount allocated to stock options by the Named Executive Officer in the manner described above. While the stock option allocation is

40


expressed in a dollar denomination, the stock option allocation is used by the Company only to calculate the number of stock options to be granted in the manner described below. The stock option allocation is not available to the employees as cash compensation, except where an employee who has allocated a portion of their compensation towards stock options receives severance payments and as otherwise set forth in the Executive Severance and Retention Incentive Plan described below.grants

After the total annual stock option allocation is established, theour Named Executive Officers receive monthly option grants pursuant to our monthly stock option program, which is applicable to the Company’s monthly option grant program.majority of our employees. Under this program, theeligible employees, including our Named Executive Officers, receive on the first trading day of the month fully vested options granted at fair market value as reflected by the closing price of our stock on the date of the option grant. The number of stock options to be granted monthly will fluctuatefluctuates based on the fair market valueclosing price of our stock on the date of the option grant. The

In 2020, the actual number of options granted to theour Named Executive Officers each month was determined by the following formula: the monthly dollar(The amount of thean employee’s total annual stock option allocationallocation/12) / ([fair market valuethe closing price of our stock on the date of option grant] *x 0.40).

LOGO

48          LOGO


For stock option accounting purposes, the dollar valuevalues of stock options granted by the Company, as reflected in the Summary Executive Compensation table,Table, below, are appreciably higherdifferent than the dollar valuevalues of the total annual stock option allocation in the table above. The difference arises as the stock option allocation (please compare “Summary Executive Compensation” table provided in this Proxy Statement with the table below). Furthermore, because the stock options are granted at fair market value on the date of the option grant and are not generally transferable, they are only of value to the recipient through an increase in the market value of the Company’s common stock, thereby linking that element of compensation to Company performance.

As shown in the table below,above is the Company’samount used to determine the number of options granted, whereas the dollar values of stock option grants in the Summary Compensation Table reflects their grant date fair value under the accounting rules.

Named Executive Officer Compensation for 2021

Compensation for our Named Executive Officers electedfor 2021 remained flat as compared to receive a significant portion of their compensation in the form of stock options. The Company believes that equity ownership, including stock and stock options, helps align the interest of the2020. Our Named Executive Officers with those ofcontinued to execute our strategies and deliver strong performance throughout 2020 amidst the Company’s stockholderscontinuously evolving and is a good mechanismchallenging environment. Nonetheless, given the COVID-19 pandemic and related economic challenges, the Compensation Committee determined not to linkmake any changes to executive compensation to long-term company performance.

41


In 2016 and 2017, thefor 2021. Allocatable compensation components for the Named Executive Officers were allocated as follows (please see the “Summary Executive Compensation” table provided in this Proxy Statement for a complete description of the compensation of theour Named Executive Officers in 2016 and 2017):

Name and Position 2016

    Annual Salary

  2016
Annual Stock

Option Allocation

  2016
Monthly Stock

Option Allocation

      2016 Estimated  
Target Bonus  
 

Reed Hastings

    

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the

Board

 $900,000  $19,050,000  $1,587,500  $—   

Greg Peters

    

Chief Product Officer

  1,000,000   3,275,000   272,917   1,500,000 

Ted Sarandos

    

Chief Content Officer

  1,000,000   11,800,000   983,333   4,000,000 

David Wells

    

Chief Financial Officer

  2,400,000   1,800,000   150,000   —   

Neil Hunt

    

former Chief Product Officer

  1,000,000   2,150,000   179,167   5,250,000 

Name and Position 2017

    Annual Salary

  2017
Annual Stock

Option Allocation

  2017
Monthly Stock
Option Allocation
      2017 Estimated  
Target Bonus  
 

Reed Hastings

    

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the

Board

 $850,000  $21,200,000  $1,766,667  $—   

David Hyman

    

General Counsel

(allocation effective Jan 1, 2017, annualized)

  3,300,000   1,215,000   101,250   —   

David Hyman

    

(modified allocation effective July 1, 2017, annualized)

  100,000   1,215,000   101,250   3,200,000 

Greg Peters

    

Chief Product Officer

(allocation effective Jan 1, 2017, annualized)

  1,000,000   3,275,000   272,917   1,500,000 

Greg Peters

    

(modified allocation effective July 1, 2017, annualized)

  1,000,000   3,400,000   283,333   4,000,000 

Ted Sarandos

    

Chief Content Officer

  1,000,000   11,000,000   916,667   9,000,000 

David Wells

    

Chief Financial Officer

  2,500,000   1,910,000   159,167   —   

Neil Hunt

    

former Chief Product Officer

  1,000,000   2,410,000   200,833   5,200,000 

42


As reflected in the above table, Mr. Peters received an increase in compensation upon becoming Chief Product Officer. Further, in connection with his departure from Netflix, Mr. Hunt entered into Netflix’s standard form of release agreement with Netflix which included customary confidentiality and release provisions and received a lump sum cash payment equal to $6,457,500.

As described above, the Committee determined that the maximum annual salary payable to any Named Executive Officer (excluding Mr. Wells) for 2017 would be $1 million, with the exception of Mr. Hyman who had received over $1 million in salary at the time he was first included in the performance-bonus program in July 2017. Any portion of a Named Executive Officer’s compensation over $1 million that was not allocated to stock options was allocated to a target bonus to the Named Executive Officer pursuant to our Performance Bonus Plan (the “Plan”), which was approved by stockholders at our 2014 Annual Meeting. The Plan is intended to permit the Company to seek a full federal tax deduction for compensation paid under the Plan, compensation that otherwise might not have been fully tax deductible to the Company if paid as salary. However the portion of salary received by Mr. Hyman above $1 million was not deductible pursuant to IRS regulations. At the time of Mr. Hunt’s departure, it2021 was determined that Mr. Hyman would likely be a Named Executive Officer for 2017 and was added to the performance bonus-program, and the majority of the Mr. Hyman’s remaining 2017 cash compensation was thereafter allocated to the target performance bonus component.

Under the Plan, bonuses were paid only if the performance goals set by the Committee at the beginning of the applicable performance period were achieved. The actual awards (if any) payable for any performance period varied depending on the extent to which actual performance met, exceeded or fell short of the goals approved by the Committee. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to determine whether a bonus will be paid in the event an executive terminates employment before the bonus is scheduled to be paid. In addition, the Compensation Committee has discretion to decrease (but not increase) the bonuses that otherwise would be paid under the Bonus Plan based on actual performance versus the specified goals. In 2017, the Committee approved Mr. Hunt’s receipt of Q2 2017 bonus under the Performance Bonus Plan although he left the Company on June 23, 2017.

43


consultation with Compensia. For 2017, the Compensation Committee approved four performance periods under the Plan. Each performance period was comprised of one of our fiscal quarters so that, in effect, one performance period always was in effect during 2017. For each performance period, the Committee chose a target bonus for each participant and a goal for the Company’s global streaming revenue for that quarter, as calculated under generally accepted accounting principles and reflected in our publicly-available financial statements. The Committee chose this goal because global streaming revenue is an important metric demonstrating growth of the Company. Under the bonus formula approved by the Committee, the actual bonus earned (if any) would correspond to the percentage of the goal achieved, provided that no bonus would be payable for less than 80% achievement of the goal and the maximum bonus payable would be 120% of the target bonus, even if performance was greater than 120% of the goal. The below table shows the performance goals, the level of achievement of the goals, and the percentage of target bonuses earned for each of the four quarterly performance periods.

Performance Goals by Quarter

 Q1  Q2  Q3  Q4 
Goal for Global Streaming Revenue (in thousands) $  2,516,000  $  2,640,000  $  2,859,000  $  3,169,000 
Actual Global Streaming Revenue (in thousands)  2,516,000   2,671,000   2,875,000   3,181,000 

% of Goal Achieved

  100  101  101  100

% of Target Bonus Earned

  100  101  101  100

Based on the above, the following bonuses were paid in 2017:

Name

  Q1   Q2   Q3   Q4   2017 

David Hyman

          

Target Bonus

  $   $   $800,000   $800,000   $1,600,000 

Actual Bonus

           808,000    800,000    1,608,000 

Greg Peters

          

Target Bonus

   375,000    375,000    1,000,000    1,000,000    2,750,000 

Actual Bonus

   375,000    378,750    1,010,000    1,000,000    2,763,750 

Ted Sarandos

          

Target Bonus

       2,250,000        2,250,000        2,250,000        2,250,000        9,000,000 

Actual Bonus

   2,250,000    2,272,500    2,272,500    2,250,000    9,045,000 

Neil Hunt

          

Target Bonus

   1,300,000    1,300,000        2,600,000 

Actual Bonus

   1,300,000    1,313,000        2,613,000 

44


In 2018, the Company will not offer performance-based bonuses and all cash compensation will be paid as salary. The compensation components for the persons expected to be Named Executive Officers for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20182021, the compensation components for our Named Executive Officers serving in 2021 are being allocated as follows, based on the allocation methodmethods described above:above. Beginning in 2021, in an effort to maximize flexibility and personal choice for our employees, the minimum annual stock option allowance (generally based upon 5% of total allocatable compensation) has been eliminated for most employees and the value has been added to the employees’ total allocatable compensation.

 

Name and Position

 2018
Annual Salary
   2018
Annual Stock
Option Allocation
   2018
Monthly Stock
Option Allocation
 

Reed Hastings

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

 $700,000   $28,700,000   $2,391,667 

David Hyman

General Counsel

  2,500,000    3,275,000    272,917 

Greg Peters

Chief Product Officer

  6,000,000    6,600,000    550,000 

Ted Sarandos

Chief Content Officer

  12,000,000    14,250,000    1,187,500 

David Wells

Chief Financial Officer

  2,800,000    2,450,000    204,167 

Name and Position

 

2021

Annual Stock

Option
Allocation

($)

 2021 Annual Stock
Option Allocation
as percentage of
Allocatable
Compensation (%)
 

2021

Annual
Salary

($)

 2021 Annual
Salary as
Percentage of
Allocatable
Compensation
(%)

Reed Hastings, Co-Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chairman of the Board

   34,000,000   98.1   650,000   1.9

Ted Sarandos, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Content Officer

   14,650,000   42.3   20,000,000   57.7

Spencer Neumann, Chief Financial Officer

   5,550,000   48.1   6,000,000   51.9

Greg Peters, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Product Officer

   6,900,000   36.5   12,000,000   63.5

David Hyman, Chief Legal Officer

   4,725,000   50.0   4,725,000   50.0

Rachel Whetstone, Chief Communications Officer

   500,000   9.5   4,750,000   90.5

Vested stock options granted on or after January 1, 2007 can be exercised up to ten (10) years following grant regardless of employment status. The Company believes that this increase in the life of the options enhances the value of such options for each employee and thereby encourages equity ownership in the Company, which is helpful in aligning the interests of employees with that of the Company. The Company does not believe that staggered vesting of stock options or early expiration of options following termination has a material impact on retention. The Company believes that creating a high-performance culture and providing highly competitive compensation packages are the critical components for retaining employees, including its Named Executive Officers.TERMINATION-BASED COMPENSATION AND CHANGE IN CONTROL RETENTION INCENTIVES

Across the broader employee base, the Company utilizes salary and stock options as its key compensation components in order to be competitive within the marketplace. Similarly situated companies typically offer employees an equity component as part of their overall compensation and as such, the Company believes it is important to provide this opportunity to its employees, including the Named Executive Officers. By permitting employees to request a customized combination of salary and stock options, the Company believes it is better able to take into consideration personal compensation preferences and thereby offer a more compelling compensation package. In addition, offering grants monthly provides employees with a “dollar-cost averaging” approach to the price of their option grants. Option grants made on an infrequent basis are more susceptible to the whims of market timing and fluctuations. By granting options each month, the Company believes it alleviates to a great extent the arbitrariness of option timing and the potential negative employee issues associated with “underwater” options.

Each Named Executive Officer, like all of the Company’s employees, is eligible to receive an additional $15,000 in annual compensation not reflected above that may be used to defray the cost of health care benefits previously paid by the Company. Any portion of this allowance not utilized toward the cost of health care benefits will be paid as salary, up to a maximum of $5,000.

In addition to salary and stock options, all exempt employees, including Named Executive Officers, also have the opportunity to participate in the Company’s 401(k) matching program which enables them to receive adollar-for-dollar Company match of up to 3% of his or her compensation to the 401(k)

45


fund. Mr. Hunt, Mr. Hyman, Mr. Sarandos and Mr. Wells all participated in this program in 2017 and therefore the Company matched the 401(k) contributions as shown in the tables of this Proxy Statement.

The Company also maintains a group term life insurance policy for all full-time employees.

Termination-Based Compensation and Change in Control Retention Incentives

TheOur Named Executive Officers are beneficiaries of the Company’s Amended and Restated Executiveour Severance and Retention Incentive Plan (“Severance Plan”).Plan. Under this Severance Plan, each employee of the Company at the level of Vice President or higher (“Covered Executive”) is entitled to a severance benefit upon termination of employment (other than for cause, death or permanent disability) so long as he or she signs a waiver and release of claims and an agreement not to disparage the Company, its directors or its officers in a form reasonably satisfactory to the Company. The

During 2020, the severance benefit consistsconsisted of a lump sum cash payment equal to nine (9) months of allocatable compensation, or, for newly hired Covered Executives only, a cash payment equal to 24 months of allocatable compensation, which is reduced by an amount equal to one (1) month of allocatable compensation for each month of tenure at the Company for the first 15 months of continuous employment following hire by the Company, such that the minimum benefit for such newly hired Covered Executives is the cash equivalent of nine (9)months of allocatable compensation. In order to remain competitive in attracting top talent, the severance benefit was increased in April 2021 such that newly hired Covered Executives are eligible to receive a severance benefit of up to 36 months of allocatable compensation, which is reduced by an amount equal to one month of allocatable compensation for each

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          49


month of tenure at the Company for the first 27 months of continuous employment following hire by the Company, such that the minimum benefit for such newly hired Covered Executives is the cash equivalent of nine months of allocatable compensation. The right to receive a severance benefit terminates upon a change in control transaction, so that the Covered Executives under the Severance Plan are not entitled to both a change in control benefit as well as a severance benefit.

In lieu of the severance benefit described above, the Severance Plan provides that employees covered by the Severance Plan who are employed by the Company on the date of a change in control transaction are entitled to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to twelve (12)12 months of allocatable compensation regardless of whether their employment terminates.

The CompanyWe also maintainsmaintain a plan for itsour director level employees (the “Director Plan”) that provides those employees who are employed by the Company on the date of a change in control transaction with a lump sum cash payment equal to six (6) months of allocatable compensation, regardless of whether their employment terminates. While director level employees are not guaranteed any severance upon termination of employment, to the extent any severance is provided to a director level employee, payment associated with the change in control will be in lieu of or otherwise offset against any such severance payment.

TheWe have a “single trigger” change in control plan for our executive officers. Given our monthly grants of fully vested options, a change in control does not trigger acceleration of unvested shares, which is a typical concern about single triggers. We use a single trigger change in control plan because we believe that double trigger plans, which require the occurrence of both a change in control and the executive’s termination of service from the Company believes that it is appropriatefor an executive to make such payment uponreceive severance, create a misaligned incentive for executives to attempt to be terminated from the single-triggerCompany in the event of a change in control in ordercontrol. We would rather encourage our executives to reduce distractions associated with the uncertainty surrounding change in control transactions andcontinue to reduce potential conflicts that might otherwise arise when a Company executive must relyfocus on the decisionslong-term success of the acquiring company for either continued employment or severance.Company instead of their individual severance opportunities.

The benefits owing under the Severance Plan or Director Plan are to be paid to an individual covered under the applicable plan by the Company as soon as administratively practicable following the completion of all conditions to the payment, but in no event more than two and one half months following the date of the triggering event. The Company believesWe believe that benefits under the Company’s Amended and Restated Executive Severance and Retention Incentive Plan are consistent with similar

46


benefits offered to executive officers of similarly situated companies and moreover, the Severance Plan is an important element in advancing the Company’s overall compensation philosophy ofmechanism for attracting and retaining outstanding performers. Each of the terms “allocatable compensation,” “cause” and “change in control” are defined in the plan,Severance Plan, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.1410.1 to the Company’s Form10-Q filed on July 19, 2017.April 22, 2021.

Tax Considerations

TAX CONSIDERATIONS

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”) was among the provisions that were amended pursuant to tax reform legislation thatThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), which was signed into law inon December 22, 2017. The prior version of sectionSection 162(m) generally disallowed a tax deduction for compensation that we paid to our Chief Executive Officer or any of the next three most highly compensated executive officers (excluding the Chief Financial Officer) to the extent that the compensation for any such individual exceeded $1 million in any taxable year. However, this deduction limitation did not apply to compensation that was “performance-based” under Section 162(m). The Company’s stock options grants were intended to qualify as performance-based under Section 162(m). Similarly, bonuses earned and paid under the Performance Bonus Plan were intended to qualify as performance-based. Amounts paid as salary did not qualify as performance-based. In establishing compensation for 2017, the Compensation Committee considered the potential impact of the prior version of Section 162(m) on executive officer compensation. For this reason, the Committee chose to cap each Named Executive Officer’s salary (other than the Chief Financial Officer) at $1 million for 2017, with the exception of Mr. Hyman who had received over $1 million in salary at the time he first became included in the performance-bonus program. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), which became law on December 22, 2017, amended Section 162(m) to eliminate the deductibility ofexception for performance-based compensation. As a result, effective for our 2018 fiscal year and thereafter, the maximum U.S. federal income tax deduction that we may receive for annual compensation overpaid to any officer covered by Section 162(m) is $1 million butper officer, subject to a transition rule that is described below.

LOGO

50          LOGO


The Tax Act also expanded the individuals covered by Section 162(m) to include our Chief Financial Officer and certain of our former officers. Separately, the Tax Act included a transition rule with respect to compensation that is provided pursuant to a written binding contract in effect on November 2, 2017 and not materially modified after that date. In addition, the 2017 amendments also made the Chief Financial Officer subject to section 162(m). The Company will continueWe continued to grant stock options in 2018,2020, although the compensation income recognized upon exercise of such grants by individuals covered by Section 162(m) will not be deductible by us to the extent the total compensation for each officer subject to the rules of Section 162(m)such individual exceeds $1 million in the year in which the stock options are exercised. Pursuant toOn December 30, 2020, the transition rule, stock option grants that were granted prior to 2018 will generally still be eligible for the prior rules underInternal Revenue Service published final Section 162(m) and will be deductible as performance-based compensation. regulations that generally implement amendments made to Section 162(m) by the Tax Act.

The Compensation Committee considers the tax impact of the Company’s compensation programs,program, and will generally seek to preserve the deductibility of any performance-based compensation that is subject to the transition rule of the Tax Act, to the extent practicable and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

The Committee’s Consideration of the 2017 Nonbinding Advisory Vote to Approve However, the Compensation Committee reserves the right to pay compensation that is not tax deductible.

PROHIBITION ON HEDGING

Our Insider Trading Policy, which was updated in March 2020, prohibits our section 16 officers and directors from engaging in any transactions involving any hedging or derivatives of Company equity securities, including trading in futures and derivative securities and engaging in hedging activities relating to our securities (including forward sales contracts, equity swaps, collars, puts, calls, exchange traded options and exchange funds), or otherwise engaging in transactions that are designed to hedge or offset decreases in the market value of our Named Executive Officersequity securities, provided that it does not limit director and officer participation in our stock option program. This prohibition applies only to transactions initiated on or after March 4, 2020 and applies to Company equity securities that are (i) granted to the section 16 officer or director by the Company as part of their compensation or (ii) held, directly or indirectly, by the section 16 officer or the director.

CLAWBACK OF PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS

In 2017, 95.5%While we do not currently use performance-based awards, the Netflix, Inc. 2020 Stock Plan allows us to recover certain performance-based equity awards or amounts paid in respect of such awards in the shares voted approvedevent of certain acts of misconduct by award recipients. Such misconduct generally relates to contributing to or failing to take reasonable steps to prevent an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements.

COMPENSATION RISK

Our compensation policies for non-executive salaried employees are the compensation ofsame as those outlined for our Named Executive Officers. AtGiven the timedesign of our compensation structure, as detailed in the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we do not believe that our compensation policies and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

CODE OF ETHICS

We have adopted a Code of Ethics for our directors, officers and other employees. A copy of the 2017 vote, the Committee had already approved the design and goalsCode of Ethics is available on our executive compensation program for 2017. The Committee reviewed these voting results, which affirmed supportInvestor Relations website at https://ir.netflix.net/governance/governance-docs/default.aspx. Any waivers of the Company’s approach to executive compensation.Code of Ethics will be posted at that website.

 

47LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          51


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORTCompensation Committee

Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on the review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

Rodolphe Belmer

Mathias Döpfner

Timothy M. Haley

Jay C. Hoag

A. George (Skip) Battle

Anne Sweeney

 

48LOGO

52          LOGO


LOGO

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE                    

OFFICERS AND OTHER MATTERS                    


SUMMARY COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND OTHER MATTERS

Summary Executive Compensation

TABLE

The following summary executive compensation tableSummary Compensation Table sets forth information concerning the compensation paid byto our Named Executive Officers in 2020, 2019 and 2018, other than Mr. Neumann who joined the Company to: (i) the Chiefin 2019 and Ms. Whetstone who was not a Named Executive Officer (the Company’s principal executive officer), (ii) the Chief Financial Officer (the Company’s principal financial officer), and (iii) the Company’s other named executive officers listed below.in 2018 or 2019. A description of the method for determining the amount of salary in proportion to total compensation is set forth above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

 

Name and Principal Position

    Year  Salary
($)
  Option
Awards
($) (1)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) (2)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 

Reed Hastings

   2017  $850,000  $  23,527,499  $  $  $ 24,377,499 

Chief Executive Officer, President, Chairman of the

Board

   2016   900,000   22,277,733         23,177,733 
   2015       1,115,385   15,496,797         16,612,182 
       

Neil Hunt

   2017   576,923   1,315,595     2,613,000   6,465,600 (3)   10,971,118 

former Chief Product Officer

   2016   1,000,000   2,549,204   5,250,000   7,950(4)   8,807,154 
   2015   1,067,308   2,368,693   4,987,500   7,950(5)   8,431,451 

David Hyman(6)

   2017   1,761,538   1,435,074   1,608,000   309,027(7)   5,113,639 

General Counsel

       

Greg Peters

   2017   1,000,000   3,725,022   2,763,750   1,748,718(8)   9,237,490 

Chief Product Officer

   2016   1,000,000   3,869,152   1,500,000   1,660,135(9)   8,029,287 
   2015   1,038,462   3,156,900   997,500   414,087(10)   5,606,949 

Ted Sarandos

   2017   1,000,000   12,389,532   9,045,000   8,100(11)   22,442,632 

Chief Content Officer

   2016   1,000,000   13,917,568   4,000,000   5,538(12)   18,923,106 
   2015   1,107,692   10,877,040   1,995,000   6,038(13)   13,985,770 

David Wells

   2017   2,500,000   2,127,673      553,641(14)   5,181,314 

Chief Financial Officer

   2016   2,400,000   2,145,314        1,549,136 (15)   6,094,450 
   2015   2,036,539   1,928,575      198,300(16)   4,163,414 

Name and Principal Position

Year

Salary

($)

Bonus

($)

Option

Awards

($)(1)

All Other

Compensation

($)(2)

Total

($)

Reed Hastings

Co-Chief Executive Officer, President, and
Chairman of the Board

 2020 650,000 42,428,878 147,146(3)  43,226,024
 2019 700,000 37,411,492 465,637(3)  38,577,129
 2018 700,000 35,380,417  36,080,417

Ted Sarandos

Co-Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Content Officer

 2020 20,000,000 18,304,124 1,014,127(4)  39,318,251
 2019 18,000,000 16,575,902 98,497(5)  34,674,399
 2018 12,000,000 17,615,220 32,251(6)  29,647,471

Spencer Neumann

Chief Financial Officer

 2020 6,050,000 6,865,017 24,134(7)  12,939,151
 2019 4,981,693(8)  1,700,000(9)  5,272,020 29,008(10)  11,982,721

Greg Peters

Chief Operating Officer and

Chief Product Officer

 2020 12,000,000 8,664,337 141,658(11)  20,805,995
 2019 10,000,000 8,287,734 340,976(12)  18,628,710
 2018 6,000,000 7,985,902 832,687(13)  14,818,589

David Hyman

Chief Legal Officer

 2020 5,500,000 4,956,023 13,324(14)  10,469,347
 2019 3,500,000 4,643,129 15,550(15)  8,158,679
 2018 2,500,000 3,914,510 11,890(16)  6,426,400

Rachel Whetstone

Chief Communications Officer

 2020 4,800,000 555,929 170(17)  5,356,099

 

(1)

Dollar amounts in the Option Awards column reflect the grant date fair value with respect to stock options during the respective fiscal year.year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The dollar amounts set forth in the Option Awards column are different than the stock option allocation amounts described in the section above entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” because the stock option allocation amounts in such section are reflective of the total compensation amount attributable to stock option grants, notrather than the accounting valuation. For a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation reflected in the Option Awards column, refer to Note 79 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 and the discussion under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Stock-Based Compensation”2020 in the Company’s our Form10-K filed with the SEC on February 5, 2018.January 28, 2021.

(2)In accordance with

We permit our Named Executive Officers and their family members and guests to use our corporate aircraft for personal use. Personal use of company aircraft is calculated based upon our actual aggregate incremental cost to operate the Company’s Performance Bonus Planaircraft, including fuel, crew, and catering costs, as approvedwell as other variable costs. Fixed costs, which do not change based on usage, are excluded.

(3)

Includes $147,146 and $465,637 for personal use of company aircraft in 2020 and 2019, respectively.

(4)

Includes $11,400 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan, $7,639 for car services, and $995,088 in residential security costs paid to a third-party provider by the Company valued on the basis of aggregate incremental cost to the Company. The Compensation Committee approved the dollar amounts representresidential security costs after considering the amount earned in 2017 forpotential security concerns related to Mr. Sarandos’s service as an executive officer and believes the achievement of the established performance goals.security costs are a necessary and appropriate business expense.

49


(3)(5)

Includes $8,100$9,800 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan, $74,282 for personal use of company aircraft and $14,415 for car services.

(6)

Includes $8,250 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan, $19,599 for personal use of company aircraft, and $4,402 for commuting expenses.

(7)

Includes $14,581 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan, $2,174 for personal use of company aircraft, and $7,379 for car services.

(8)

Amount reflects the prorated payment of Mr. Neumann’s salary based on his employment start date of January 7, 2019.

(9)

Amount represents a one-time cash payment Mr. Neumann received upon joining the Company, which served as an inducement for him to join the Company.

(10)

Includes $6,731 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan and $6,457,500 in connection with his departure from Netflix.$22,277 for car services.

(4)(11)

Includes $7,950 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan.$140,394 for personal use of company aircraft and $1,264 for commuting expenses.

(5)(12)

Includes $7,950 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan.$340,471 for personal use of company aircraft and $505 for commuting expenses.

(6)(13)Mr. Hyman was not a Named Executive Officer for 2016 and 2017.
(7)

Includes $8,100 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan and payment of $300,155 for living allowances, taxes paid by the Company to tax equalize the employee for an expatriate assignment and $772 of commuting expenses.

(8)Includes $1,746,105$829,025 for living allowances and taxes paid by the Company to tax equalize the employee for an expatriate assignment and $2,613 of$3,662 for commuting expenses.

(9)(14)

Includes $1,660,135 for living allowances and taxes paid by the Company to tax equalize the employee for an expatriate assignment.

(10)Includes $414,087 for living allowances and taxes paid by the Company to tax equalize the employee for an expatriate assignment.
(11)Includes $8,100$11,400 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan.plan, $1,664 for commuting expenses and $260 for car services.

(12)(15)

Includes $5,538$9,800 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan.plan, $1,481 reimbursed by the Company for tax preparation, $4,118 for commuting expenses, and $151 for car services.

(13)(16)

Includes $5,538$8,250 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan and a $500 auto allowance.$3,640 for commuting expenses.

(14)(17)

Includes $8,100 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan and payment of $545,541$170 for living allowances and taxes paid by the Company to tax equalize the employee for an expatriate assignment.

(15)Includes $7,950 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan and payment of $1,541,186 for living allowances and taxes paid by the Company to tax equalize the employee for an expatriate assignment.
(16)Includes $7,950 representing our matching contribution made under our 401(k) plan and payment of $190,350 for living allowances and taxes paid by the Company to tax equalize the employee for an expatriate assignment.car services.

 

50LOGO

54          LOGO


Grants of Plan-Based Awards

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table sets forth information concerning grants of awards made to the Named Executive Officers during 2017.2020. As described above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Company grantswe grant eligible employees, including the Named Executive Officers, fully vested stock options on a monthly basis. These stock options can generally be exercised up to 10 years following the date of grant, regardless of employment status. These are the only equity awards made to the Named Executive Officers. Also as described above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” in 2017, the Company granted performance-based cash compensation to each of the Named Executive Officers who allocated more than $1 million of their allocatable compensation to cash. These cash performance-based awards were granted on a quarterly basis under the Company’s Performance Bonus Plan. The material terms of these cash incentive and stock option grants, including the formula for determining the number of stock options to be granted, are set forth above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

 

     Estimated Potential Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
  All Other
Option Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
  Exercise
or Base Price
of Option
Awards
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
 

Name

   Grant Date  Threshold ($)  Target ($)  Maximum ($)  (#)  ($/Sh)  ($) 

Reed Hastings

  1/3/2017      31,130  $127.4900   1,808,784 

Reed Hastings

  2/1/2017      31,373  $140.7800   2,012,929 

Reed Hastings

  3/1/2017      30,961  $142.6500   2,012,883 

Reed Hastings

  4/3/2017      30,062  $146.9200   1,917,165 

Reed Hastings

  5/1/2017      28,431  $155.3500   1,917,185 

Reed Hastings

  6/1/2017      27,097  $162.9900   1,917,091 

Reed Hastings

  7/3/2017      30,216  $146.1700   1,939,384 

Reed Hastings

  8/1/2017      24,264  $182.0300   1,939,429 

Reed Hastings

  9/1/2017      25,275  $174.7400   1,939,331 

Reed Hastings

  10/2/2017      24,952  $177.0100   2,041,153 

Reed Hastings

  11/1/2017      22,306  $198.0000   2,041,077 

Reed Hastings

  12/1/2017      23,641  $186.8200   2,041,088 

Neil Hunt

  1/3/2017      3,513  $127.4900   204,120 

Neil Hunt

  1/22/2017   1,040,000   1,300,000   1,560,000    

Neil Hunt

  2/1/2017      3,567  $140.7800   228,863 

Neil Hunt

  3/1/2017      3,519  $142.6500   228,783 

Neil Hunt

  4/3/2017      3,418  $146.9200   217,979 

Neil Hunt

  4/22/2017   1,040,000   1,300,000   1,560,000    

Neil Hunt

  5/1/2017      3,232  $155.3500   217,943 

Neil Hunt

  6/1/2017      3,080  $162.9900   217,907 

David Hyman

  1/3/2017      3,276  $127.4900   190,349 

David Hyman

  2/1/2017      1,798  $140.7800   115,362 

David Hyman

  3/1/2017      1,775  $142.6500   115,399 

David Hyman

  4/3/2017      1,722  $146.9200   109,818 

David Hyman

  5/1/2017      1,630  $155.3500   109,916 

David Hyman

  6/1/2017      1,553  $162.9900   109,874 

David Hyman

  7/3/2017      1,732  $146.1700   111,167 

Name

Grant Date

All Other Option
Awards: Number of

Securities

Underlying Options
(#)

Exercise or
Base Price of
Option Awards
($/Sh)

Grant Date

Fair Value of
Stock and
Option Awards
($)

Reed Hastings

 1/2/2020 19,456 329.81 3,019,914
 2/3/2020 19,786 358.00 3,333,636
 3/2/2020 18,589 381.05 3,333,192
 4/1/2020 19,455 364.08 3,592,105
 5/1/2020 17,057 415.27 3,592,148
 6/1/2020 16,631 425.92 3,592,258
 7/1/2020 14,585 485.64 3,650,607
 8/3/2020 14,206 498.62 3,650,780
 9/1/2020 12,727 556.55 3,650,685
 10/1/2020 13,428 527.51 3,671,163
 11/2/2020 14,632 484.12 3,671,286
 12/1/2020 14,038 504.58 3,671,105

Ted Sarandos

 1/2/2020 8,527 329.81 1,323,540
 2/3/2020 8,525 358.00 1,436,331
 3/2/2020 8,010 381.05 1,436,272
 4/1/2020 8,383 364.08 1,547,809
 5/1/2020 7,350 415.27 1,547,886
 6/1/2020 7,166 425.92 1,547,840
 7/1/2020 6,284 485.64 1,572,877
 8/3/2020 6,121 498.62 1,573,027
 9/1/2020 5,484 556.55 1,573,062
 10/1/2020 5,786 527.51 1,581,870
 11/2/2020 6,304 484.12 1,581,724
 12/1/2020 6,049 504.58 1,581,886

Spencer Neumann

 1/2/2020 3,158 329.81 490,177
 2/3/2020 3,201 358.00 539,319
 3/2/2020 3,007 381.05 539,185
 4/1/2020 3,147 364.08 581,051
 5/1/2020 2,759 415.27 581,036
 6/1/2020 2,690 425.92 581,034
 7/1/2020 2,360 485.64 590,705
 8/3/2020 2,298 498.62 590,560
 9/1/2020 2,058 556.55 590,328
 10/1/2020 2,173 527.51 594,090
 11/2/2020 2,367 484.12 593,899
 12/1/2020 2,270 504.58 593,632

 

51LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT          55


Name

Grant Date

All Other Option
Awards: Number of

Securities

Underlying Options
(#)

Exercise or
Base Price of
Option Awards
($/Sh)

Grant Date

Fair Value of
Stock and
Option Awards
($)

Greg Peters

 1/2/2020 4,296 329.81 666,815
   Estimated Potential Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
 All Other
Option Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
 Exercise
or Base Price
of Option
Awards
 Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
  2/3/2020 4,015 358.00 676,466

Name

   Grant Date Threshold ($) Target ($) Maximum ($) (#) ($/Sh) ($) 
 3/2/2020 3,772 381.05 676,357
 4/1/2020 3,949 364.08 729,130
 5/1/2020 3,461 415.27 728,875
 6/1/2020 3,375 425.92 728,992
 7/1/2020 2,960 485.64 740,884
 8/3/2020 2,883 498.62 740,898
 9/1/2020 2,583 556.55 740,922
 10/1/2020 2,725 527.51 745,004
 11/2/2020 2,969 484.12 744,946
 12/1/2020 2,849 504.58 745,048

David Hyman

 7/23/2017  640,000  800,000  960,000     1/2/2020 2,432 329.81 377,489

David Hyman

 8/1/2017     1,390  $182.0300  111,103 

David Hyman

 9/1/2017     1,449  $174.7400  111,181 

David Hyman

 10/2/2017     1,430  $177.0100  116,978 

David Hyman

 10/23/2017  640,000  800,000  960,000    

David Hyman

 11/1/2017     1,278  $198.0000  116,941 

David Hyman

 12/1/2017     1,355  $186.8200  116,986 

Greg Peters

 1/3/2017     5,352  $127.4900  310,974 

Greg Peters

 1/22/2017  300,000  375,000  450,000    

Greg Peters

 2/1/2017     4,846  $140.7800  310,925 

Greg Peters

 3/1/2017     4,783  $142.6500  310,960 

Greg Peters

 4/3/2017     4,644  $146.9200  296,165 

Greg Peters

 4/22/2017  300,000  375,000  450,000    

Greg Peters

 5/1/2017     4,392  $155.3500  296,165 

Greg Peters

 6/1/2017     4,186  $162.9900  296,156 

Greg Peters

 7/3/2017     4,668  $146.1700  299,611 

Greg Peters

 7/23/2017  800,000  1,000,000  1,200,000    

Greg Peters

 8/1/2017     3,891  $182.0300  311,009 

Greg Peters

 9/1/2017     4,054  $174.7400  311,060 

Greg Peters

 10/2/2017     4,001  $177.0100  327,295 

Greg Peters

 10/23/2017  800,000  1,000,000  1,200,000    

Greg Peters

 11/1/2017     3,578  $198.0000  327,400 

Greg Peters

 12/1/2017     3,791  $186.8200  327,303 

Ted Sarandos

 1/3/2017     19,282  $127.4900  1,120,365 

Ted Sarandos

 1/22/2017  1,800,000  2,250,000  2,700,000    

Ted Sarandos

 2/1/2017     16,279  $140.7800  1,044,480 

Ted Sarandos

 3/1/2017     16,065  $142.6500  1,044,442 

Ted Sarandos

 4/3/2017     15,598  $146.9200  994,742 

Ted Sarandos

 4/22/2017  1,800,000  2,250,000  2,700,000    

Ted Sarandos

 5/1/2017     14,751  $155.3500  994,703 

Ted Sarandos

 6/1/2017     14,060  $162.9900  994,734 

Ted Sarandos

 7/3/2017     15,679  $146.1700  1,006,341 

Ted Sarandos

 7/23/2017  1,800,000  2,250,000  2,700,000    

Ted Sarandos

 8/1/2017     12,589  $182.0300  1,006,242 

Ted Sarandos

 9/1/2017     13,115  $174.7400  1,006,303 

Ted Sarandos

 10/2/2017     12,946  $177.0100  1,059,024 

Ted Sarandos

 10/23/2017  1,800,000  2,250,000  2,700,000    

Ted Sarandos

 11/1/2017     11,574  $198.0000  1,059,062 

Ted Sarandos

 12/1/2017     12,267  $186.8200  1,059,094 

David Wells

 1/3/2017     2,942  $127.4900  170,943 
 2/3/2020 2,299 358.00 387,346
 3/2/2020 2,160 381.05 387,309
 4/1/2020 2,260 364.08 417,279
 5/1/2020 1,981 415.27 417,192
 6/1/2020 1,932 425.92 417,308
 7/1/2020 1,695 485.64 424,256
 8/3/2020 1,650 498.62 424,031
 9/1/2020 1,479 556.55 424,245
 10/1/2020 1,560 527.51 426,498
 11/2/2020 1,700 484.12 426,544
 12/1/2020 1,631 504.58 426,526

Rachel Whetstone

 1/2/2020 221 329.81 34,303
 2/3/2020 262 358.00 44,143
 3/2/2020 246 381.05 44,110
 4/1/2020 257 364.08 47,452
 5/1/2020 226 415.27 47,595
 6/1/2020 220 425.92 47,519
 7/1/2020 193 485.64 48,308
 8/3/2020 188 498.62 48,314
 9/1/2020 169 556.55 48,477
 10/1/2020 177 527.51 48,391
 11/2/2020 194 484.12 48,676
 12/1/2020 186 504.58 48,641

 

52LOGO


     Estimated Potential Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
  All Other
Option Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
  Exercise
or Base Price
of Option
Awards
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
 

Name

   Grant Date  Threshold ($)  Target ($)  Maximum ($)  (#)  ($/Sh)  ($) 

David Wells

  2/1/2017      2,826  $140.7800   181,320 

David Wells

  3/1/2017      2,790  $142.6500   181,388 

David Wells

  4/3/2017      2,708  $146.9200   172,699 

David Wells

  5/1/2017      2,562  $155.3500   172,763 

David Wells

  6/1/2017      2,441  $162.9900   172,699 

David Wells

  7/3/2017      2,722  $146.1700   174,709 

David Wells

  8/1/2017      2,186  $182.0300   174,728 

David Wells

  9/1/2017      2,277  $174.7400   174,712 

David Wells

  10/2/2017      2,248  $177.0100   183,893 

David Wells

  11/1/2017      2,010  $198.0000   183,922 

David Wells

  12/1/2017      2,130  $186.8200   183,897 

 

(1)Amounts in this column reflect performance-based cash compensation approved pursuant to the Performance Bonus Plan. Amounts in the “Threshold” column reflect 80% achievement of the applicable performance goal, below which no amount is payable. Amounts in the “Target” and “Maximum” columns reflect 100% and 120% achievement of the performance goal, respectively.
56          LOGO

53


Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalOUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL Year-EndYEAR-END

The following table sets forth information concerning equity awards for each Named Executive Officer that remained outstanding as of December 31, 2017.2020. All stock options are fully vested.vested and can generally be exercised up to 10 years following the date of grant.

 

Option Awards

Name

Number of

Securities Underlying

Unexercised Options:

Exercisable (#)

Option
Exercise Price
($)

Option

Expiration Date

Reed Hastings

 38,801 16.11 3/1/2022
 Option Awards  38,388 16.28 4/2/2022

Name

 Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options:
Exercisable
 Option
Exercise Price
($)
 Option
Expiration Date
 

Reed Hastings

 75,369  $4.4200  3/3/2018 

Reed Hastings

 63,889  $5.2157  4/1/2018 

Reed Hastings

 75,271  $4.4286  5/1/2018 

Reed Hastings

 75,558  $4.4129  6/2/2018 

Reed Hastings

 86,037  $3.8714  7/1/2018 

Reed Hastings

 79,800  $4.1743  8/1/2018 

Reed Hastings

 75,656  $4.4057  9/2/2018 

Reed Hastings

 77,672  $4.2914  10/1/2018 

Reed Hastings

 99,883  $3.3371  11/3/2018 

Reed Hastings

 105,868  $3.1486  12/1/2018 

Reed Hastings

 78,092  $4.2671  1/2/2019 

Reed Hastings

 63,147  $5.2786  2/2/2019 

Reed Hastings

 67,907  $4.9071  3/2/2019 

Reed Hastings

 54,418  $6.1243  4/1/2019 

Reed Hastings

 52,458  $6.3543  5/1/2019 

Reed Hastings

 56,966  $5.8486  6/1/2019 

Reed Hastings

 57,414  $5.8029  7/1/2019 

Reed Hastings

 51,898  $6.4243  8/3/2019 

Reed Hastings

 55,342  $6.0214  9/1/2019 

Reed Hastings

 52,269  $6.3743  10/1/2019 

Reed Hastings

 43,372  $7.6857  11/2/2019 

Reed Hastings

 40,061  $8.3186  12/1/2019 

Reed Hastings

 54,516  $7.6400  1/4/2020 

Reed Hastings

 95,578  $8.7186  2/1/2020 

Reed Hastings

 83,692  $9.9571  3/1/2020 

Reed Hastings

 77,777  $10.7143  4/1/2020 

Reed Hastings

 57,197  $14.5700  5/3/2020 

Reed Hastings

 54,369  $15.3271  6/1/2020 

Reed Hastings

 53,193  $15.6657  7/1/2020 

Reed Hastings

 57,260  $14.5543  8/2/2020 

Reed Hastings

 43,239  $19.2729  9/1/2020 

Reed Hastings

 37,716  $22.0943  10/1/2020 

Reed Hastings

 34,853  $23.9100  11/1/2020 

Reed Hastings

 29,148  $28.5914  12/1/2020 
 53,774 11.62 5/1/2022
 69,503 8.99 6/1/2022
 64,477 9.69 7/2/2022
 80,276 7.79 8/1/2022
 78,225 7.99 9/4/2022
 78,057 8.01 10/1/2022
 56,315 11.10 11/1/2022
 57,561 10.86 12/3/2022
 47,551 13.14 1/2/2023
 35,399 23.54 2/1/2023
 30,807 27.05 3/1/2023
 31,976 26.06 4/1/2023
 27,398 30.42 5/1/2023
 26,278 31.71 6/3/2023
 26,012 32.04 7/1/2023
 23,415 35.59 8/1/2023
 20,188 41.29 9/3/2023
 17,969 46.37 10/1/2023
 17,717 47.04 11/1/2023
 16,030 51.99 12/2/2023
 16,079 51.83 1/2/2024
 21,637 57.77 2/3/2024
 19,635 63.66 3/3/2024
 23,996 52.10 4/1/2024
 25,998 48.07 5/1/2024
 20,734 60.29 6/2/2024
 18,494 67.59 7/1/2024
 20,566 60.77 8/1/2024
 18,361 68.09 9/2/2024
 19,943 62.69 10/1/2024
 22,526 55.49 11/3/2024
 25,599 48.83 12/1/2024
 25,074 49.85 1/2/2025
 45,290 63.01 2/2/2025
 41,601 68.61 3/2/2025
 48,363 59.02 4/1/2025
 35,868 79.58 5/1/2025
 32,067 89.00 6/1/2025
 30,485 93.64 7/1/2025
 25,360 112.56 8/3/2025

 

54LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT    57


Option Awards

Name

Number of

Securities Underlying

Unexercised Options:

Exercisable (#)

Option
Exercise Price
($)

Option

Expiration Date

Reed Hastings

 26,977 105.79 9/1/2025
 Option Awards  26,933 105.98 10/1/2025

Name

 Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options:
Exercisable
 Option
Exercise Price
($)
 Option
Expiration Date
 

Reed Hastings

 32,697  $25.4871  1/3/2021 

Reed Hastings

 41,097  $30.4143  2/1/2021 

Reed Hastings

 42,763  $29.2329  3/1/2021 

Reed Hastings

 36,141  $34.5843  4/1/2021 

Reed Hastings

 36,890  $33.8843  5/2/2021 

Reed Hastings

 32,739  $38.1800  6/1/2021 

Reed Hastings

 32,648  $38.2843  7/1/2021 

Reed Hastings

 33,222  $37.6257  8/1/2021 

Reed Hastings

 37,513  $33.3243  9/1/2021 

Reed Hastings

 77,266  $16.1786  10/3/2021 

Reed Hastings

 109,249  $11.4414  11/1/2021 

Reed Hastings

 130,263  $9.5957  12/1/2021 

Reed Hastings

 121,121  $10.3200  1/3/2022 

Reed Hastings

 35,581  $17.5671  2/1/2022 

Reed Hastings

 38,801  $16.1071  3/1/2022 

Reed Hastings

 38,388  $16.2814  4/2/2022 

Reed Hastings

 53,774  $11.6229  5/1/2022 

Reed Hastings

 69,503  $8.9929  6/1/2022 

Reed Hastings

 64,477  $9.6929  7/2/2022 

Reed Hastings

 80,276  $7.7857  8/1/2022 

Reed Hastings

 78,225  $7.9900  9/4/2022 

Reed Hastings

 78,057  $8.0071  10/1/2022 

Reed Hastings

 56,315  $11.0986  11/1/2022 

Reed Hastings

 57,561  $10.8586  12/3/2022 

Reed Hastings

 47,551  $13.1443  1/2/2023 

Reed Hastings

 35,399  $23.5429  2/1/2023 

Reed Hastings

 30,807  $27.0529  3/1/2023 

Reed Hastings

 31,976  $26.0614  4/1/2023 

Reed Hastings

 27,398  $30.4157  5/1/2023 

Reed Hastings

 26,278  $31.7100  6/3/2023 

Reed Hastings

 26,012  $32.0400  7/1/2023 

Reed Hastings

 23,415  $35.5886  8/1/2023 

Reed Hastings

 20,188  $41.2857  9/3/2023 

Reed Hastings

 17,969  $46.3743  10/1/2023 

Reed Hastings

 17,717  $47.0386  11/1/2023 

Reed Hastings

 16,030  $51.9886  12/2/2023 

Reed Hastings

 16,079  $51.8314  1/2/2024 

Reed Hastings

 21,637  $57.7686  2/3/2024 

Reed Hastings

 19,635  $63.6557  3/3/2024 
 26,513 107.64 11/2/2025
 22,765 125.37 12/1/2025
 25,959 109.96 1/4/2026
 42,176 94.09 2/1/2026
 40,374 98.30 3/1/2026
 37,547 105.70 4/1/2026
 42,629 93.11 5/2/2026
 39,097 101.51 6/1/2026
 41,055 96.67 7/1/2026
 42,055 94.37 8/1/2026
 40,755 97.38 9/1/2026
 38,670 102.63 10/3/2026
 32,188 123.30 11/1/2026
 33,857 117.22 12/1/2026
 31,130 127.49 1/3/2027
 31,373 140.78 2/1/2027
 30,961 142.65 3/1/2027
 30,062 146.92 4/3/2027
 28,431 155.35 5/1/2027
 27,097 162.99 6/1/2027
 30,216 146.17 7/3/2027
 24,264 182.03 8/1/2027
 25,275 174.74 9/1/2027
 24,952 177.01 10/2/2027
 22,306 198.00 11/1/2027
 23,641 186.82 12/1/2027
 21,966 201.07 1/2/2028
 22,557 265.07 2/1/2028
 20,590 290.39 3/1/2028
 21,332 280.29 4/2/2028
 19,085 313.30 5/1/2028
 16,612 359.93 6/1/2028
 15,016 398.18 7/2/2028
 17,670 338.38 8/1/2028
 16,444 363.60 9/4/2028
 15,676 381.43 10/1/2028
 18,839 317.38 11/1/2028
 20,597 290.30 12/3/2028
 22,338 267.66 1/2/2029
 18,881 339.85 2/1/2029
 17,958 357.32 3/1/2029
 17,486 366.96 4/1/2029
 16,939 378.81 5/1/2029
 19,061 336.63 6/3/2029

 

55LOGO

58        LOGO


Option Awards

Name

Number of

Securities Underlying

Unexercised Options:

Exercisable (#)

Option
Exercise Price
($)

Option

Expiration Date

Reed Hastings

 17,130 374.60 7/1/2029
 Option Awards  20,083 319.50 8/1/2029

Name

 Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options:
Exercisable
 Option
Exercise Price
($)
 Option
Expiration Date
 

Reed Hastings

 23,996  $52.0986  4/1/2024 

Reed Hastings

 25,998  $48.0743  5/1/2024 

Reed Hastings

 20,734  $60.2943  6/2/2024 

Reed Hastings

 18,494  $67.5857  7/1/2024 

Reed Hastings

 20,566  $60.7714  8/1/2024 

Reed Hastings

 18,361  $68.0857  9/2/2024 

Reed Hastings

 19,943  $62.6857  10/1/2024 

Reed Hastings

 22,526  $55.4871  11/3/2024 

Reed Hastings

 25,599  $48.8300  12/1/2024 

Reed Hastings

 25,074  $49.8486  1/2/2025 

Reed Hastings

 45,290  $63.0100  2/2/2025 

Reed Hastings

 41,601  $68.6071  3/2/2025 

Reed Hastings

 48,363  $59.0171  4/1/2025 

Reed Hastings

 35,868  $79.5757  5/1/2025 

Reed Hastings

 32,067  $89.0029  6/1/2025 

Reed Hastings

 30,485  $93.6357  7/1/2025 

Reed Hastings

 25,360  $112.5600  8/3/2025 

Reed Hastings

 26,977  $105.7900  9/1/2025 

Reed Hastings

 26,933  $105.9800  10/1/2025 

Reed Hastings

 26,513  $107.6400  11/2/2025 

Reed Hastings

 22,765  $125.3700  12/1/2025 

Reed Hastings

 25,959  $109.9600  1/4/2026 

Reed Hastings

 42,176  $94.0900  2/1/2026 

Reed Hastings

 40,374  $98.3000  3/1/2026 

Reed Hastings

 37,547  $105.7000  4/1/2026 

Reed Hastings

 42,629  $93.1100  5/2/2026 

Reed Hastings

 39,097  $101.5100  6/1/2026 

Reed Hastings

 41,055  $96.6700  7/1/2026 

Reed Hastings

 42,055  $94.3700  8/1/2026 

Reed Hastings

 40,755  $97.3800  9/1/2026 

Reed Hastings

 38,670  $102.6300  10/3/2026 

Reed Hastings

 32,188  $123.3000  11/1/2026 

Reed Hastings

 33,857  $117.2200  12/1/2026 

Reed Hastings

 31,130  $127.4900  1/3/2027 

Reed Hastings

 31,373  $140.7800  2/1/2027 

Reed Hastings

 30,961  $142.6500  3/1/2027 

Reed Hastings

 30,062  $146.9200  4/3/2027 

Reed Hastings

 28,431  $155.3500  5/1/2027 

Reed Hastings

 27,097  $162.9900  6/1/2027 
 22,181 289.29 9/3/2029
 23,802 269.58 10/1/2029
 22,373 286.81 11/1/2029
 20,699 309.99 12/2/2029
 19,456 329.81 1/2/2030
 19,786 358.00 2/3/2030
 18,589 381.05 3/2/2030
 19,455 364.08 4/1/2030
 17,057 415.27 5/1/2030
 16,631 425.92 6/1/2030
 14,585 485.64 7/1/2030
 14,206 498.62 8/3/2030
 12,727 556.55 9/1/2030
 13,428 527.51 10/1/2030
 14,632 484.12 11/2/2030
 14,038 504.58 12/1/2030

Ted Sarandos

 25,130 79.58 5/1/2025
 22,470 89.00 6/1/2025
 21,357 93.64 7/1/2025
 15,952 125.37 12/1/2025
 26,125 94.09 2/1/2026
 25,008 98.30 3/1/2026
 26,405 93.11 5/2/2026
 25,430 96.67 7/1/2026
 26,050 94.37 8/1/2026
 25,245 97.38 9/1/2026
 19,282 127.49 1/3/2027
 16,279 140.78 2/1/2027
 15,679 146.17 7/3/2027
 8,248 359.93 6/1/2028
 7,456 398.18 7/2/2028
 8,773 338.38 8/1/2028
 8,165 363.60 9/4/2028
 7,783 381.43 10/1/2028
 9,354 317.38 11/1/2028
 10,227 290.30 12/3/2028
 11,091 267.66 1/2/2029
 8,276 339.85 2/1/2029
 7,871 357.32 3/1/2029
 7,664 366.96 4/1/2029
 7,425 378.81 5/1/2029
 8,355 336.63 6/3/2029
 7,508 374.60 7/1/2029
 8,802 319.50 8/1/2029

 

56LOGO


  Option Awards 

Name

 Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options:
Exercisable
  Option
Exercise Price
($)
  Option
Expiration Date
 

Reed Hastings

  30,216  $146.1700   7/3/2027 

Reed Hastings

  24,264  $182.0300   8/1/2027 

Reed Hastings

  25,275  $174.7400   9/1/2027 

Reed Hastings

  24,952  $177.0100   10/2/2027 

Reed Hastings

  22,306  $198.0000   11/1/2027 

Reed Hastings

  23,641  $186.8200   12/1/2027 

Neil Hunt

  3,806  $28.5914   12/1/2020 

Neil Hunt

  7,084  $25.4871   1/3/2021 

Neil Hunt

  12,327  $30.4143   2/1/2021 

Neil Hunt

  12,831  $29.2329   3/1/2021 

Neil Hunt

  10,843  $34.5843   4/1/2021 

Neil Hunt

  11,067  $33.8843   5/2/2021 

Neil Hunt

  9,821  $38.1800   6/1/2021 

Neil Hunt

  9,793  $38.2843   7/1/2021 

Neil Hunt

  9,968  $37.6257   8/1/2021 

Neil Hunt

  11,256  $33.3243   9/1/2021 

Neil Hunt

  23,177  $16.1786   10/3/2021 

Neil Hunt

  35,581  $17.5671   2/1/2022 

Neil Hunt

  38,801  $16.1071   3/1/2022 

Neil Hunt

  38,388  $16.2814   4/2/2022 

Neil Hunt

  3,931  $13.1443   1/2/2023 

Neil Hunt

  22,120  $23.5429   2/1/2023 

Neil Hunt

  19,250  $27.0529   3/1/2023 

Neil Hunt

  19,985  $26.0614   4/1/2023 

Neil Hunt

  17,122  $30.4157   5/1/2023 

Neil Hunt

  16,422  $31.7100   6/3/2023 

Neil Hunt

  16,254  $32.0400   7/1/2023 

Neil Hunt

  14,637  $35.5886   8/1/2023 

Neil Hunt

  12,614  $41.2857   9/3/2023 

Neil Hunt

  11,228  $46.3743   10/1/2023 

Neil Hunt

  11,074  $47.0386   11/1/2023 

Neil Hunt

  10,017  $51.9886   12/2/2023 

Neil Hunt

  10,052  $51.8314   1/2/2024 

Neil Hunt

  12,621  $57.7686   2/3/2024 

Neil Hunt

  11,452  $63.6557   3/3/2024 

Neil Hunt

  13,993  $52.0986   4/1/2024 

Neil Hunt

  15,169  $48.0743   5/1/2024 

Neil Hunt

  12,096  $60.2943��  6/2/2024 

Neil Hunt

  10,787  $67.5857   7/1/2024 

57


  Option Awards 

Name

 Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options:
Exercisable
  Option
Exercise Price
($)
  Option
Expiration Date
 

Neil Hunt

  11,998  $60.7714   8/1/2024 

Neil Hunt

  10,710  $68.0857   9/2/2024 

Neil Hunt

  11,634  $62.6857   10/1/2024 

Neil Hunt

  13,139  $55.4871   11/3/2024 

Neil Hunt

  14,931  $48.8300   12/1/2024 

Neil Hunt

  14,630  $49.8486   1/2/2025 

Neil Hunt

  6,195  $63.0100   2/2/2025 

Neil Hunt

  5,691  $68.6071   3/2/2025 

Neil Hunt

  6,622  $59.0171   4/1/2025 

Neil Hunt

  4,907  $79.5757   5/1/2025 

Neil Hunt

  4,389  $89.0029   6/1/2025 

Neil Hunt

  4,172  $93.6357   7/1/2025 

Neil Hunt

  3,476  $112.5600   8/3/2025 

Neil Hunt

  3,692  $105.7900   9/1/2025 

Neil Hunt

  3,686  $105.9800   10/1/2025 

Neil Hunt

  3,629  $107.6400   11/2/2025 

Neil Hunt

  3,115  $125.3700   12/1/2025 

Neil Hunt

  3,553  $109.9600   1/4/2026 

Neil Hunt

  4,760  $94.0900   2/1/2026 

Neil Hunt

  4,557  $98.3000   3/1/2026 

Neil Hunt

  4,237  $105.7000   4/1/2026 

Neil Hunt

  4,812  $93.1100   5/2/2026 

Neil Hunt

  4,412  $101.5100   6/1/2026 

Neil Hunt

  4,634  $96.6700   7/1/2026 

Neil Hunt

  4,746  $94.3700   8/1/2026 

Neil Hunt

  4,600  $97.3800   9/1/2026 

Neil Hunt

  4,364  $102.6300   10/3/2026 

Neil Hunt

  3,633  $123.3000   11/1/2026 

Neil Hunt

  3,821  $117.2200   12/1/2026 

Neil Hunt

  3,513  $127.4900   1/3/2027 

Neil Hunt

  3,567  $140.7800   2/1/2027 

Neil Hunt

  3,519  $142.6500   3/1/2027 

Neil Hunt

  3,418  $146.9200   4/3/2027 

Neil Hunt

  3,232  $155.3500   5/1/2027 

Neil Hunt

  3,080  $162.9900   6/1/2027 

David Hyman

  4,669  $10.7143   4/1/2020 

David Hyman

  3,430  $14.5700   5/3/2020 

David Hyman

  3,262  $15.3271   6/1/2020 

David Hyman

  3,192  $15.6657   7/1/2020 

58


  Option Awards 

Name

 Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options:
Exercisable
  Option
Exercise Price
($)
  Option
Expiration Date
 

David Hyman

  3,437  $14.5543   8/2/2020 

David Hyman

  2,597  $19.2729   9/1/2020 

David Hyman

  2,261  $22.0943   10/1/2020 

David Hyman

  2,093  $23.9100   11/1/2020 

David Hyman

  1,750  $28.5914   12/1/2020 

David Hyman

  12,285  $16.2814   4/2/2022 

David Hyman

  5,145  $60.7714   8/1/2024 

David Hyman

  4,592  $68.0857   9/2/2024 

David Hyman

  4,984  $62.6857   10/1/2024 

David Hyman

  5,635  $55.4871   11/3/2024 

David Hyman

  6,398  $48.8300   12/1/2024 

David Hyman

  6,272  $49.8486   1/2/2025 

David Hyman

  3,962  $63.0100   2/2/2025 

David Hyman

  3,647  $68.6071   3/2/2025 

David Hyman

  4,235  $59.0171   4/1/2025 

David Hyman

  3,143  $79.5757   5/1/2025 

David Hyman

  2,807  $89.0029   6/1/2025 

David Hyman

  2,667  $93.6357   7/1/2025 

David Hyman

  2,221  $112.5600   8/3/2025 

David Hyman

  2,363  $105.7900   9/1/2025 

David Hyman

  2,359  $105.9800   10/1/2025 

David Hyman

  2,322  $107.6400   11/2/2025 

David Hyman

  1,994  $125.3700   12/1/2025 

David Hyman

  2,274  $109.9600   1/4/2026 

David Hyman

  4,439  $94.0900   2/1/2026 

David Hyman

  4,249  $98.3000   3/1/2026 

David Hyman

  3,952  $105.7000   4/1/2026 

David Hyman

  4,487  $93.1100   5/2/2026 

David Hyman

  4,115  $101.5100   6/1/2026 

David Hyman

  4,321  $96.6700   7/1/2026 

David Hyman

  4,426  $94.3700   8/1/2026 

David Hyman

  4,290  $97.3800   9/1/2026 

David Hyman

  4,070  $102.6300   10/3/2026 

David Hyman

  3,387  $123.3000   11/1/2026 

David Hyman

  3,564  $117.2200   12/1/2026 

David Hyman

  3,276  $127.4900   1/3/2027 

David Hyman

  1,798  $140.7800   2/1/2027 

David Hyman

  1,775  $142.6500   3/1/2027 

David Hyman

  1,722  $146.9200   4/3/2027 

59


  Option Awards 

Name

 Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options:
Exercisable
  Option
Exercise Price
($)
  Option
Expiration Date
 

David Hyman

  1,630  $155.3500   5/1/2027 

David Hyman

  1,553  $162.9900   6/1/2027 

David Hyman

  1,732  $146.1700   7/3/2027 

David Hyman

  1,390  $182.0300   8/1/2027 

David Hyman

  1,449  $174.7400   9/1/2027 

David Hyman

  1,430  $177.0100   10/2/2027 

David Hyman

  1,278  $198.0000   11/1/2027 

David Hyman

  1,355  $186.8200   12/1/2027 

Greg Peters

  8,533  $48.8300   12/1/2024 

Greg Peters

  8,358  $49.8486   1/2/2025 

Greg Peters

  9,009  $63.0100   2/2/2025 

Greg Peters

  8,274  $68.6071   3/2/2025 

Greg Peters

  9,618  $59.0171   4/1/2025 

Greg Peters

  7,133  $79.5757   5/1/2025 

Greg Peters

  6,377  $89.0029   6/1/2025 

Greg Peters

  6,062  $93.6357   7/1/2025 

Greg Peters

  5,047  $112.5600   8/3/2025 

Greg Peters

  5,366  $105.7900   9/1/2025 

Greg Peters

  5,357  $105.9800   10/1/2025 

Greg Peters

  5,274  $107.6400   11/2/2025 

Greg Peters

  4,528  $125.3700   12/1/2025 

Greg Peters

  5,163  $109.9600   1/4/2026 

Greg Peters

  7,251  $94.0900   2/1/2026 

Greg Peters

  6,941  $98.3000   3/1/2026 

Greg Peters

  6,455  $105.7000   4/1/2026 

Greg Peters

  7,329  $93.1100   5/2/2026 

Greg Peters

  6,721  $101.5100   6/1/2026 

Greg Peters

  7,058  $96.6700   7/1/2026 

Greg Peters

  7,230  $94.3700   8/1/2026 

Greg Peters

  7,007  $97.3800   9/1/2026 

Greg Peters

  6,648  $102.6300   10/3/2026 

Greg Peters

  5,533  $123.3000   11/1/2026 

Greg Peters

  5,821  $117.2200   12/1/2026 

Greg Peters

  5,352  $127.4900   1/3/2027 

Greg Peters

  4,846  $140.7800   2/1/2027 

Greg Peters

  4,783  $142.6500   3/1/2027 

Greg Peters

  4,644  $146.9200   4/3/2027 

Greg Peters

  4,392  $155.3500   5/1/2027 

Greg Peters

  4,186  $162.9900   6/1/2027 

60


  Option Awards 

Name

 Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options:
Exercisable
  Option
Exercise Price
($)
  Option
Expiration Date
 

Greg Peters

  4,668  $146.1700   7/3/2027 

Greg Peters

  3,891  $182.0300   8/1/2027 

Greg Peters

  4,054  $174.7400   9/1/2027 

Greg Peters

  4,001  $177.0100   10/2/2027 

Greg Peters

  3,578  $198.0000   11/1/2027 

Greg Peters

  3,791  $186.8200   12/1/2027 

Theodore Sarandos

  25,130  $79.5757   5/1/2025 

Theodore Sarandos

  22,470  $89.0029   6/1/2025 

Theodore Sarandos

  21,357  $93.6357   7/1/2025 

Theodore Sarandos

  17,773  $112.5600   8/3/2025 

Theodore Sarandos

  18,904  $105.7900   9/1/2025 

Theodore Sarandos

  18,872  $105.9800   10/1/2025 

Theodore Sarandos

  18,579  $107.6400   11/2/2025 

Theodore Sarandos

  15,952  $125.3700   12/1/2025 

Theodore Sarandos

  18,190  $109.9600   1/4/2026 

Theodore Sarandos

  26,125  $94.0900   2/1/2026 

Theodore Sarandos

  25,008  $98.3000   3/1/2026 

Theodore Sarandos

  23,258  $105.7000   4/1/2026 

Theodore Sarandos

  26,405  $93.1100   5/2/2026 

Theodore Sarandos

  24,218  $101.5100   6/1/2026 

Theodore Sarandos

  25,430  $96.6700   7/1/2026 

Theodore Sarandos

  26,050  $94.3700   8/1/2026 

Theodore Sarandos

  25,245  $97.3800   9/1/2026 

Theodore Sarandos

  23,953  $102.6300   10/3/2026 

Theodore Sarandos

  19,938  $123.3000   11/1/2026 

Theodore Sarandos

  20,972  $117.2200   12/1/2026 

Theodore Sarandos

  19,282  $127.4900   1/3/2027 

Theodore Sarandos

  16,279  $140.7800   2/1/2027 

Theodore Sarandos

  16,065  $142.6500   3/1/2027 

Theodore Sarandos

  15,598  $146.9200   4/3/2027 

Theodore Sarandos

  14,751  $155.3500   5/1/2027 

Theodore Sarandos

  14,060  $162.9900   6/1/2027 

Theodore Sarandos

  15,679  $146.1700   7/3/2027 

Theodore Sarandos

  12,589  $182.0300   8/1/2027 

Theodore Sarandos

  13,115  $174.7400   9/1/2027 

Theodore Sarandos

  12,946  $177.0100   10/2/2027 

Theodore Sarandos

  11,574  $198.0000   11/1/2027 

Theodore Sarandos

  12,267  $186.8200   12/1/2027 

David Wells

  420  $27.0529   3/1/2023 

61


  Option Awards 

Name

 Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options:
Exercisable
  Option
Exercise Price
($)
  Option
Expiration Date
 

David Wells

  5,278  $26.0614   4/1/2023 

David Wells

  4,522  $30.4157   5/1/2023 

David Wells

  4,333  $31.7100   6/3/2023 

David Wells

  4,291  $32.0400   7/1/2023 

David Wells

  3,864  $35.5886   8/1/2023 

David Wells

  3,332  $41.2857   9/3/2023 

David Wells

  2,968  $46.3743   10/1/2023 

David Wells

  2,926  $47.0386   11/1/2023 

David Wells

  2,646  $51.9886   12/2/2023 

David Wells

  2,653  $51.8314   1/2/2024 

David Wells

  3,969  $57.7686   2/3/2024 

David Wells

  3,598  $63.6557   3/3/2024 

David Wells

  4,396  $52.0986   4/1/2024 

David Wells

  4,767  $48.0743   5/1/2024 

David Wells

  3,801  $60.2943   6/2/2024 

David Wells

  3,388  $67.5857   7/1/2024 

David Wells

  3,773  $60.7714   8/1/2024 

David Wells

  3,367  $68.0857   9/2/2024 

David Wells

  3,654  $62.6857   10/1/2024 

David Wells

  4,130  $55.4871   11/3/2024 

David Wells

  4,690  $48.8300   12/1/2024 

David Wells

  4,599  $49.8486   1/2/2025 

David Wells

  5,537  $63.0100   2/2/2025 

David Wells

  5,082  $68.6071   3/2/2025 

David Wells

  5,915  $59.0171   4/1/2025 

David Wells

  4,382  $79.5757   5/1/2025 

David Wells

  3,920  $89.0029   6/1/2025 

David Wells

  3,731  $93.6357   7/1/2025 

David Wells

  3,101  $112.5600   8/3/2025 

David Wells

  3,298  $105.7900   9/1/2025 

David Wells

  3,293  $105.9800   10/1/2025 

David Wells

  3,241  $107.6400   11/2/2025 

David Wells

  2,784  $125.3700   12/1/2025 

David Wells

  3,173  $109.9600   1/4/2026 

David Wells

  3,986  $94.0900   2/1/2026 

David Wells

  3,814  $98.3000   3/1/2026 

David Wells

  3,548  $105.7000   4/1/2026 

David Wells

  4,028  $93.1100   5/2/2026 

David Wells

  3,694  $101.5100   6/1/2026 

62


  Option Awards 

Name

 Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options:
Exercisable
  Option
Exercise Price
($)
  Option
Expiration Date
 

David Wells

  3,880  $96.6700   7/1/2026 

David Wells

  3,973  $94.3700   8/1/2026 

David Wells

  3,851  $97.3800   9/1/2026 

David Wells

  3,654  $102.6300   10/3/2026 

David Wells

  3,041  $123.3000   11/1/2026 

David Wells

  3,199  $117.2200   12/1/2026 

David Wells

  2,942  $127.4900   1/3/2027 

David Wells

  2,826  $140.7800   2/1/2027 

David Wells

  2,790  $142.6500   3/1/2027 

David Wells

  2,708  $146.9200   4/3/2027 

David Wells

  2,562  $155.3500   5/1/2027 

David Wells

  2,441  $162.9900   6/1/2027 

David Wells

  2,722  $146.1700   7/3/2027 

David Wells

  2,186  $182.0300   8/1/2027 

David Wells

  2,277  $174.7400   9/1/2027 

David Wells

  2,248  $177.0100   10/2/2027 

David Wells

  2,010  $198.0000   11/1/2027 

David Wells

  2,130  $186.8200   12/1/2027 

63

2021 PROXY STATEMENT    59


Options Exercises

 Option Awards

Name

Number of

Securities Underlying

Unexercised Options:

Exercisable (#)

Option
Exercise Price
($)

Option

Expiration Date

Ted Sarandos

 9,723 289.29 9/3/2029
 10,433 269.58 10/1/2029
 9,806 286.81 11/1/2029
 9,073 309.99 12/2/2029
 8,527 329.81 1/2/2030
 8,525 358.00 2/3/2030
 8,010 381.05 3/2/2030
 8,383 364.08 4/1/2030
 7,350 415.27 5/1/2030
 7,166 425.92 6/1/2030
 6,284 485.64 7/1/2030
 6,121 498.62 8/3/2030
 5,484 556.55 9/1/2030
 5,786 527.51 10/1/2030
 6,304 484.12 11/2/2030
 6,049 504.58 12/1/2030

Spencer Neumann

 1,308 339.85 2/1/2029
 2,916 357.32 3/1/2029
 2,838 366.96 4/1/2029
 2,750 378.81 5/1/2029
 3,095 336.63 6/3/2029
 2,781 374.60 7/1/2029
 3,260 319.50 8/1/2029
 3,601 289.29 9/3/2029
 3,864 269.58 10/1/2029
 3,632 286.81 11/1/2029
 3,361 309.99 12/2/2029
 3,158 329.81 1/2/2030
 3,201 358.00 2/3/2030
 3,007 381.05 3/2/2030
 3,147 364.08 4/1/2030
 2,759 415.27 5/1/2030
 2,690 425.92 6/1/2030
 2,360 485.64 7/1/2030
 2,298 498.62 8/3/2030
 2,058 556.55 9/1/2030
 2,173 527.51 10/1/2030
 2,367 484.12 11/2/2030
 2,270 504.58 12/1/2030

Greg Peters

 6,941 98.30 3/1/2026
 6,455 105.70 4/1/2026
 7,329 93.11 5/2/2026
 6,721 101.51 6/1/2026
 7,058 96.67 7/1/2026
 7,230 94.37 8/1/2026
 7,007 97.38 9/1/2026

LOGO

 

60        LOGO


 Option Awards

Name

Number of

Securities Underlying

Unexercised Options:

Exercisable (#)

Option
Exercise Price
($)

Option

Expiration Date

Greg Peters

 6,648 102.63 10/3/2026
 5,533 123.30 11/1/2026
 5,821 117.22 12/1/2026
 5,352 127.49 1/3/2027
 4,846 140.78 2/1/2027
 4,783 142.65 3/1/2027
 4,644 146.92 4/3/2027
 4,392 155.35 5/1/2027
 4,186 162.99 6/1/2027
 4,668 146.17 7/3/2027
 3,891 182.03 8/1/2027
 4,054 174.74 9/1/2027
 4,001 177.01 10/2/2027
 3,578 198.00 11/1/2027
 3,791 186.82 12/1/2027
 3,523 201.07 1/2/2028
 5,187 265.07 2/1/2028
 4,735 290.39 3/1/2028
 4,906 280.29 4/2/2028
 4,389 313.30 5/1/2028
 3,820 359.93 6/1/2028
 3,453 398.18 7/2/2028
 4,063 338.38 8/1/2028
 3,782 363.60 9/4/2028
 3,605 381.43 10/1/2028
 4,332 317.38 11/1/2028
 4,737 290.30 12/3/2028
 5,137 267.66 1/2/2029
 4,168 339.85 2/1/2029
 3,965 357.32 3/1/2029
 3,861 366.96 4/1/2029
 3,739 378.81 5/1/2029
 4,209 336.63 6/3/2029
 3,782 374.60 7/1/2029
 4,434 319.50 8/1/2029
 4,897 289.29 9/3/2029
 5,255 269.58 10/1/2029
 4,939 286.81 11/1/2029
 4,570 309.99 12/2/2029
 4,296 329.81 1/2/2030
 4,015 358.00 2/3/2030
 3,772 381.05 3/2/2030
 3,949 364.08 4/1/2030
 3,461 415.27 5/1/2030
 3,375 425.92 6/1/2030
 2,960 485.64 7/1/2030

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT    61


 Option Awards

Name

Number of

Securities Underlying

Unexercised Options:

Exercisable (#)

Option
Exercise Price
($)

Option

Expiration Date

Greg Peters

 2,883 498.62 8/3/2030
 2,583 556.55 9/1/2030
 2,725 527.51 10/1/2030
 2,969 484.12 11/2/2030
 2,849 504.58 12/1/2030

David Hyman

 6,272 49.85 1/2/2025
 3,962 63.01 2/2/2025
 3,647 68.61 3/2/2025
 4,235 59.02 4/1/2025
 3,143 79.58 5/1/2025
 2,807 89.00 6/1/2025
 2,667 93.64 7/1/2025
 2,221 112.56 8/3/2025
 2,363 105.79 9/1/2025
 2,359 105.98 10/1/2025
 2,322 107.64 11/2/2025
 1,994 125.37 12/1/2025
 2,274 109.96 1/4/2026
 4,439 94.09 2/1/2026
 4,249 98.30 3/1/2026
 3,952 105.70 4/1/2026
 4,487 93.11 5/2/2026
 4,115 101.51 6/1/2026
 4,321 96.67 7/1/2026
 4,426 94.37 8/1/2026
 4,290 97.38 9/1/2026
 4,070 102.63 10/3/2026
 3,387 123.30 11/1/2026
 3,564 117.22 12/1/2026
 3,276 127.49 1/3/2027
 1,798 140.78 2/1/2027
 1,775 142.65 3/1/2027
 1,722 146.92 4/3/2027
 1,630 155.35 5/1/2027
 1,553 162.99 6/1/2027
 1,732 146.17 7/3/2027
 1,390 182.03 8/1/2027
 1,449 174.74 9/1/2027
 1,430 177.01 10/2/2027
 1,278 198.00 11/1/2027
 1,355 186.82 12/1/2027
 1,259 201.07 1/2/2028
 2,574 265.07 2/1/2028
 2,349 290.39 3/1/2028
 2,435 280.29 4/2/2028
 2,177 313.30 5/1/2028

LOGO

62        LOGO


 Option Awards

Name

Number of

Securities Underlying

Unexercised Options:

Exercisable (#)

Option
Exercise Price
($)

Option

Expiration Date

David Hyman

 1,896 359.93 6/1/2028
 1,713 398.18 7/2/2028
 2,017 338.38 8/1/2028
 1,876 363.60 9/4/2028
 1,789 381.43 10/1/2028
 2,150 317.38 11/1/2028
 2,350 290.30 12/3/2028
 2,549 267.66 1/2/2029
 2,360 339.85 2/1/2029
 2,245 357.32 3/1/2029
 2,186 366.96 4/1/2029
 2,117 378.81 5/1/2029
 2,383 336.63 6/3/2029
 2,141 374.60 7/1/2029
 2,511 319.50 8/1/2029
 2,772 289.29 9/3/2029
 2,976 269.58 10/1/2029
 2,796 286.81 11/1/2029
 2,587 309.99 12/2/2029
 2,432 329.81 1/2/2030
 2,299 358.00 2/3/2030
 2,160 381.05 3/2/2030
 2,260 364.08 4/1/2030
 1,981 415.27 5/1/2030
 1,932 425.92 6/1/2030
 1,695 485.64 7/1/2030
 1,650 498.62 8/3/2030
 1,479 556.55 9/1/2030
 1,560 527.51 10/1/2030
 1,700 484.12 11/2/2030
 1,631 504.58 12/1/2030

Rachel Whetstone

 20 290.30 12/3/2028
 137 267.66 1/2/2029
 214 339.85 2/1/2029
 204 357.32 3/1/2029
 199 366.96 4/1/2029
 192 378.81 5/1/2029
 217 336.63 6/3/2029
 195 374.60 7/1/2029
 228 319.50 8/1/2029
 252 289.29 9/3/2029
 271 269.58 10/1/2029
 254 286.81 11/1/2029
 235 309.99 12/2/2029
 221 329.81 1/2/2030
 262 358.00 2/3/2030

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT    63


 Option Awards

Name

Number of

Securities Underlying

Unexercised Options:

Exercisable (#)

Option
Exercise Price
($)

Option

Expiration Date

Rachel Whetstone

 246 381.05 3/2/2030
 257 364.08 4/1/2030
 226 415.27 5/1/2030
 220 425.92 6/1/2030
 193 485.64 7/1/2030
 188 498.62 8/3/2030
 169 556.55 9/1/2030
 177 527.51 10/1/2030
 194 484.12 11/2/2030
 186 504.58 12/1/2030

OPTION EXERCISES

The following table sets forth information concerning each exercise of stock options during 20172020 for each of the Named Executive Officers on an aggregated basis.

 

 Option Awards Option Awards

Name

 Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
 Value Realized
on Exercise
($) (1)
 

Number of Shares

Acquired on Exercise
(#)

Value Realized

on Exercise

($)(1)

Reed Hastings

 1,098,692  $177,973,897  1,327,634 612,125,269

Neil Hunt

 240,000  37,461,936 

Ted Sarandos

 105,372 30,045,923

Spencer Neumann

  

Greg Peters

 37,986 15,038,592

David Hyman

 82,404  12,012,545  26,754 11,968,543

Greg Peters

 56,875  5,832,084 

Ted Sarandos

 168,035  20,503,173 

David Wells

 8,000  1,329,553 

Rachel Whetstone

  

(1)

Dollar value realized on exercise equals the difference between the closing price on the date of exercise less the exercise price of the option and does not necessarily reflect the sales price of the shares or if a sale was made.

Potential Payments upon Termination orPOTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR Change-in-CHANGE-IN-CONTROL

Control

The Named Executive Officers are beneficiaries of the Company’s Amended and Restated Executiveour Severance and Retention Incentive Plan, as described in more detail above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The information below reflects the estimated value of the compensation to be paid by the Companyus to each of the Named Executive Officers in the event of termination or a change in control under the terms of the Amended and Restated Executive Severance and Retention Incentive Plan. The amounts shown below assume that termination or change in control was effective as of December 31, 20172020 and is based on 20182021 allocatable compensation, amounts, which went into effect prior to the end of ourthe 2020 fiscal year. The actual amounts that would be paid can only be determined at the time of the actual triggering event. The right to receive a severance benefit terminates upon a change in control transaction, so that the beneficiaries of the plan are not entitled to both a change in control benefit and a severance benefit. Further, in connection with his departure from Netflix, Mr. Hunt entered into Netflix’s standard form of release agreement with Netflix which included customary confidentiality and release provisions and received a lump sum cash payment equal to $6,457,500.

 

Name

 Severance
Benefit
 Change in
Control
Benefit
 

Severance

Benefit

($)(1)

Change in

Control

Benefit

($)(2)

Reed Hastings

 $21,000,000  $28,000,000  25,987,500 34,650,000

Ted Sarandos

 25,987,500 34,650,000

Spencer Neumann

 8,662,500 11,550,000

Greg Peters

 14,175,000 18,900,000

David Hyman

 4,125,000  $5,500,000  7,087,500 9,450,000

Greg Peters

 9,000,000  $12,000,000 

Ted Sarandos

 18,750,000  $25,000,000 

David Wells

 3,750,000  $5,000,000 

Rachel Whetstone

 3,937,500 5,250,000

 

64LOGO

64        LOGO


(1)

The amounts in this column correspond to lump sum payments in cash that are equal to nine months of allocatable compensation. The amounts in this column would be payable upon a termination of employment (other than for cause, death, or permanent disability), so long as the Named Executive Officer signs a waiver and release of claims and an agreement not to disparage us, our directors or officers in a form reasonably satisfactory to us. The right to receive a severance benefit terminates upon a change in control transaction, so that the Named Executive Officers are not entitled to both a change in control benefit and a severance benefit.

(2)

The amounts in this column correspond to lump sum payments in cash that are equal to twelve months of allocatable compensation for the Named Executive Officer as of December 31, 2020. These are single-trigger payments that would be made upon a change in control, provided that the Named Executive Officer had not previously received severance under the Severance Plan.

Pay Ratio Disclosure

PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, the Company iswe are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of the Company’sour employees and the annual total compensation of Mr.our Co-Chief Executive Officers, Messrs. Hastings the CEO.and Sarandos. The pay ratio included in this information is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K.

As disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table, the 20172020 annual total compensation as determined under Item 402 of RegulationS-K was $43,226,024 for the CEO was $24,377,499.Mr. Hastings and $39,318,251 for Mr. Sarandos. The 20172020 annual total compensation as determined under Item 402 of RegulationS-K for theour median employee was $183,304.$219,577. Based on the foregoing, the Company’sour estimate of the ratio of the CEO’sour Co-Chief Executive Officers’ annual total compensation to theour median employee’s annual total compensation for fiscal year 20172020 is 133197 to 1.1, in the case of Mr. Hastings, and 179 to 1, in the case of Mr. Sarandos.1 Given the different methodologies that various public companies will use to determine an estimate of their pay ratios, the estimated ratio reported above should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies.

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments, and estimates that werewe used were as follows:

The Company determined that, as of December 31, 2017, the global employee population consisted of 4,855 employees. The Company annualized the compensation of all full-time and part-time employees who were not employed for all of 2017.

The CompanyWe selected December 31, 2017,2020, which is within the last three months of 2017,2020, as the date upon which the Companywe would identify the “median employee”.

employee.” We also used December 31 as our measuring date in 2019. Consistent with the summary executive compensation table, the CompanySummary Compensation Table, we examined total annual compensation for all employees (excluding Messrs. Hastings and Sarandos), which included: base salary, incentive compensation plan payments, option awards consisting of stock options, and other compensation such as 401(k) matching contributions.

We annualized the compensation of all full-time and part-time employees who were not employed by us for all of 2020. For employees outside the United States, the Companywe converted their compensation to U.S. dollars using the applicable average exchange rate for 2017.2020.

1

While the 2020 allocatable compensation for Messrs. Hastings and Sarandos were identical, the total compensation amount determined under Item 402 of Regulation S-K and resulting pay ratios differ due to the accounting valuation attributable to their stock option grants.

 

65


Compensation of Directors

Since 2015, none of the Company’s directors receive cash for services they provide as directors or members of Board committees but may be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses for attending Board and Board committee meetings. Eachnon-employee director receives stock options pursuant to the Director Equity Compensation Plan. The Director Equity Compensation Plan provides for a monthly grant of stock options to eachnon-employee director of the Company in consideration for services provided to the Company and subject to the terms and conditions of the Company’s 2011 Stock Plan.

The actual number of options granted each month to each of the Company’s directors is determined by the following formula: $25,000 / ([fair market value on the date of grant] x 0.40). Each monthly grant is made on the first trading day of the month, is fully vested upon grant and is exercisable at a strike price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of the Company’snon-employee directors during 2017.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT    65


Proposal 4

Stockholder Proposal

“Proposal 4 - Political Disclosures”

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY

RECOMMENDS THAT THE

STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “AGAINST”

PROPOSAL FOUR.

LOGO

LOGO


In accordance with SEC rules, we have set forth below a stockholder proposal, along with the supporting statement of the stockholder proponent, for which we and our Board accept no responsibility. The stockholder proposal is required to be voted upon at our Annual Meeting only if properly presented at our Annual Meeting. As explained below, our Board unanimously recommends that you vote “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal.

Myra K. Young, 9295 Yorkship Court, Elk Grove, CA 95758, the beneficial owner of no less than 100 shares of the Company’s common stock on the date the proposal was submitted, has notified the Company of her intent to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting.

Resolved: Shareholders of Netflix Inc (“Company”) hereby request that our Company provide a report, updated semiannually, disclosing the Company’s:

1.

Policies and procedures for making, with corporate funds or assets, contributions and expenditures (direct or indirect) to (a) participate or intervene in any campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office, or (b) influence the general public, or any segment thereof, with respect to an election or referendum.

2.

Monetary and non-monetary contributions and expenditures (direct and indirect) used in the manner described in section 1 above, including:

a.

The identity of the recipient as well as the amount paid to each; and

b.

The title(s) of the person(s) in the Company responsible for decision-making.

The report shall be presented to the board of directors or relevant board committee and posted on the Company’s website within 12 months from the date of the annual meeting. This proposal does not encompass lobbying spending.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

As long-term shareholders, we support transparency and accountability in corporate electoral spending. This includes any activity considered intervention in a political campaign under the Internal Revenue Code, such as direct and indirect contributions to political candidates, parties, or organizations, and independent expenditures or electioneering communications on behalf of federal, state, or local candidates.

Disclosure is in the best interest of the company and its shareholders. The Supreme Court recognized this in its 2010 Citizens United decision, which said, “[D]isclosure permits citizens and shareholders to react to the speech of corporate entities in a proper way. This transparency enables the electorate to make informed decisions and give proper weight to different speakers and messages.”

Relying on available data does not provide a complete picture of the Company’s electoral spending. For example, payments to trade associations that may be used for election-related activities are undisclosed and unknown. This proposal asks Netflix to disclose all of its electoral spending, including payments to trade associations and other tax-exempt organizations, which may be used for electoral purposes. This would bring our Company in line with a growing number of leading companies in the 2020 CPA-Zicklin Index.1

Proposals on this topic at Alliant Energy, Macy’s, and Cognizant Technology Solutions passed last in 2019, despite board opposition. In 2020, shareholders of Activation Blizzard, Centene Corporation, J.B. Hunt Transport Services, and Western Union have also passed similar proposals. The Company’s Board and shareholders need comprehensive disclosure to fully evaluate the use of corporate assets in elections. We urge your support for this critical governance reform.

Consider also that our Company maintains a classified board, plurality vote standard for uncontested directors, supermajority requirements to change bylaws, and does not allow shareholders to act by written consent. This, despite the fact that a majority of shares voted to change each of these provisions, sometimes more than once.

Increase Long-Term Shareholder Value

Vote for Political Disclosures—Proposal 4

LOGO

1

https://politicalaccountability.net/hifi/files/2020-CPA-Zicklin-Index.pdf

LOGO

Names

 Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)2021 PROXY STATEMENT    
  67


NETFLIX OPPOSING STATEMENT

The Board has considered the stockholder proposal and, for the reasons described below, believes that the proposal is not in the best interests of Netflix and our stockholders.

This stockholder proposal is nearly identical to a proposal presented last year and that failed to receive a majority of votes cast. Political contributions are already publicly disclosed. Indeed, U.S. federal and all 50 state election laws require either the contributor or the recipient campaign or committee to publicly file reports disclosing such contributions. Those disclosures are aggregated by a number of groups and are available and easily searchable on public websites. Therefore, we question the benefit of reporting our political contributions in the proposed manner, as it would be duplicative of existing disclosures.

As is noted in the supporting statement, the report requested by the stockholder proposal would specifically include trade association or nonprofit payments that could be used for electoral purposes. We would note that the trade associations Netflix joins for various business-related reasons may also take political or policy positions we do not share, and that are not directly attributable to the membership dues we pay. It can also be difficult for us to assess exactly how our contributions to such organizations could be used, which could make it difficult to comply with this proposal.

While the Board opposes this specific proposal, it acknowledges the interest in greater transparency regarding corporate political contributions. Accordingly, the Board will further evaluate what disclosures are appropriate for the Company to provide regarding political contributions.

For the foregoing reasons, the Board unanimously believes that this proposal is not in the best interests of Netflix or our stockholders, and recommends that you vote “AGAINST” Proposal Four.

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast is required to approve the stockholder proposal. The proposal is precatory and accordingly, is not binding on the Board or the Company.

Netflix Recommendation

LOGO

The Board unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote “Option AwardsAGAINST
” Proposal Four.

LOGO

68        LOGO


($)Proposal 5

Stockholder Proposal

“Proposal 5 - Simple Majority Vote”

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY

RECOMMENDS THAT THE

STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “AGAINST”

PROPOSAL FIVE.

LOGO

LOGO


In accordance with SEC rules, we have set forth below a stockholder proposal, along with the supporting statement of the stockholder proponent, for which we and our Board accept no responsibility. The stockholder proposal is required to be voted upon at our Annual Meeting only if properly presented at our Annual Meeting. As explained below, our Board unanimously recommends that you vote “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal.

John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Ave., No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA, 90278, the beneficial owner of 100 shares of the Company’s common stock on the date the proposal was submitted, has notified the Company of his intent to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting.

RESOLVED, Shareholders request that our board take each step necessary so that each voting requirement in our charter and bylaws (that is explicit or implicit due to default to state law) that calls for a greater than simple majority vote be eliminated, and replaced by a requirement for a majority of the votes cast for and against applicable proposals, or a simple majority in compliance with applicable laws. If necessary this means the closest standard to a majority of the votes cast for and against such proposals consistent with applicable laws.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Shareholders are willing to pay a premium for shares of companies that have excellent corporate governance. Supermajority voting requirements have been found to be one of 6 entrenching mechanisms that are negatively related to company performance according to “What Matters in Corporate Governance” by Lucien Bebchuk, Alma Cohen and Allen Ferrell of the Harvard Law School. Supermajority requirements are used to block initiatives supported by most shareowners but opposed by a status quo management.

This proposal topic won from 74% to 88% support at Weyerhaeuser, Alcoa, Waste Management, Goldman Sachs, FirstEnergy, McGraw-Hill and Macy’s. These votes would have been higher than 74% to 88% if more shareholders had access to independent proxy voting advice. The proponents of these proposals included Ray T. Chevedden and William Steiner.

Currently a 2%-minority can frustrate the will of our 66%-shareholder majority in an election with 68% of shares casting ballots. In other words a 2%-minority could have the power to prevent shareholders from modernizing the governance of our company. This can be particularly important during periods of management underperformance and/or an economic downturn. Currently the role of shareholders is downsized because management can simply ignore an overwhelming 66%-vote of shareholders.

This proposal won more than 80% support 4-times at Netflix since 2013:

2019- 88%, 2016- 82%, 2015 - 80%, 2013 -81%

Apparently NFLX shareholders are not pleased with our directors sitting on their hands in regard to this proposal topic in spite of these enormous shareholder votes.

54% of NFLX shares rejected Jay Hoag, who chaired the NFLX Governance Committee, in 2020. Based on this 54% rejection shareholders could consider Mr. Hoag undesirable for reelection to the Board of Electronic Arts, Peloton Interactive, TripAdvisor and Zillow Group if they own stocks in these companies. Reed Hastings and Mathias Dopfner were each rejected by 33% of shares in 2020. If these directors join the Boards of any public company, shareholders who own stock in those companies could consider them undesirable directors.

38% of shares rejected management pay in 2020. Unfortunately Mr. Timothy Haley, chair of the management pay committee, is untouchable by a NFLX shareholder vote until 2022. If Mr. Haley stands for reelection at 2U, Inc. and Zuroa in 2021 shareholders in those companies could consider Mr. Haley an undesirable director.

Please vote yes:

Simple Majority Vote-Proposal 5

LOGO

LOGO

70        LOGO


NETFLIX OPPOSING STATEMENT

The Board has considered the stockholder proposal and, for the reasons described below, believes that the proposal is not in the best interests of Netflix and our stockholders.

Although our company has been around for more than 20 years, we operate in an extremely dynamic business environment. The global media landscape is undergoing rapid change, much of which we have been pioneering. The competitive landscape in which we operate is also rapidly changing. We face growing competition from companies that have launched similar streaming services and we are increasing our content development. We expect to see substantial shifts in market dynamics over the coming years, and we need to maintain flexibility to execute our long-term strategic initiatives.

A simple majority vote requirement already applies to most corporate matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. We believe that the supermajority we have in place is appropriate to increase stability in our operations, while still being set low enough for stockholders to have a voice on issues where there is strong consensus.

This proposal has been presented for stockholders most recently in 2020 and received a majority of votes cast. The Board has weighed the voting results as part of a regular and ongoing examination of our governance structure. We are also aware that many stockholders, including ours, are supportive of a simple majority standard. The Board continues to believe that the current governance structure, including our supermajority standard, is appropriate for this point in our evolution. There is a desire to have some flexibility to implement our long-term plan, and we believe the supermajority standard is important to providing this needed flexibility. This provision ensures that fundamental changes are broadly supported by stockholders, and we continue to believe that it is in the best interest of the Company and our stockholders.

For the foregoing reasons, the Board unanimously believes that this proposal is not in the best interests of Netflix or our stockholders, and recommends that you vote “AGAINST” Proposal Five.

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of the majority of the Votes Cast is required to approve the stockholder proposal. The proposal is precatory and accordingly, is not binding on the Board or the Company.

Netflix Recommendation

LOGO

The Board unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote “AGAINST” Proposal Five.

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT      Total
($)71
 


Richard N. BartonProposal 6

Stockholder Proposal

“Stockholder Proposal to
Improve the Executive
Compensation Philosophy”

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY

RECOMMENDS THAT THE

STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “AGAINST”

PROPOSAL SIX.

LOGO

LOGO


In accordance with SEC rules, we have set forth below a stockholder proposal, along with the supporting statement of the stockholder proponent, for which we and our Board accept no responsibility. The stockholder proposal is required to be voted upon at our Annual Meeting only if properly presented at our Annual Meeting. As explained below, our Board unanimously recommends that you vote “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal.

Jing Zhao, 1745 Copperleaf Ct., Concord, CA 94519, the beneficial owner of 8 shares of the Company’s common stock on the date the proposal was submitted, has notified the Company of his intent to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting.

Resolved: stockholders recommend that Netflix, Inc. improve the executive compensation philosophy to include CEO pay ratio and other factors.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act directed the SEC to amend Item 402 of Regulation S-K to require each company to disclose the annual total compensation of the CEO, the median of the annual total compensation of all employees (except the CEO), and the ratio of these two amounts (CEO pay ratio). Netflix’s CEO pay ratio was 133:1 in 2017 (2018 Proxy Statement p. 65), 178:1 in 2018 (2019 Proxy Statement p. 47), and 190:1 in 2019 (2020 Proxy Statement p. 70). Since the median of the annual total compensation cannot jump, the rising ratio is due to the CEO compensation jump from $24,377,499 in 2017 to $36,080,417 in 2018 (48% increase), to $38,577,129 in 2019 (Ibid. p.49).

The section “Determining Executive Compensation Magnitude” lists some philosophical points of executive compensation (Ibid. pages 39-40) without any consideration of social and economic factors, such as the CEO pay ratio.

There is no rational methodology or program to determine the executive compensation. For example, Twitter’s CEO pay ratio is less than 0.001 in 2018 and in 2019, Amazon’s CEO pay ratio is 58:1 in 2018 and in 2019. JCPenney’s alarming CEO pay ratio 1294:1 in 2018 is one cause to its bankruptcy. The executive compensations of big Japanese and European companies are much less than big American companies.

As Warren Buffett stated, “There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.” (“In Class Warfare, Guess Which Class Is Winning”, New York Times Nov. 26, 2006.) America’s ballooning executive compensation is neither responsible for the society nor sustainable for the economy, especially under the current social and economical crisis. Reducing the CEO pay ratio should be included to the philosophy of executive compensation. The Compensation Committee has the flexibility to include other social and economic factors.

NETFLIX OPPOSING STATEMENT

The Board has considered the stockholder proposal and, for the reasons described below, believes that the proposal is not in the best interests of Netflix and our stockholders.

The proposal is vague and unclear and therefore would be difficult to implement. The proposal fails to explain how the CEO pay ratio and “other factors” should be considered in improving our executive compensation philosophy. It is difficult to determine what actions would be required to change our current executive compensation philosophy to implement the proposal. The proposal also does not specify the “other factors” that should be considered in our compensation philosophy.

Moreover, CEO pay ratios vary widely across companies as different companies may have different employment and compensation practices. The SEC has stated that the purpose of CEO pay ratio disclosures is not to facilitate

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT      73


comparisons among registrants and that precise conformity or comparability of the pay ratio across companies is not necessarily achievable given the variety of factors that could cause the ratio to differ, companies may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their pay ratios. For example, the flexibility of our employees to allocate their compensation to stock options rather than cash makes it difficult to properly evaluate our overall compensation through the use of one metric, such as CEO pay ratio. As a result, the utility of CEO pay ratio as a comparative metric at Netflix and industry-wide is limited.

This proposal appears premised on the erroneous assertion that, “[t]here is no rational methodology or program to determine the executive compensation.” This is simply not true. As described in the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above, our compensation program and philosophy are thoughtfully designed and applied. We already consider a number of factors that apply to both executives and the majority of our employees alike. We aim to pay all employees at the top of their personal market and provide highly competitive compensation packages, which enables us to attract and retain the most talented employees from around the globe. The compensation program is designed to be simple, transparent, and to create a long-term alignment with stockholders’ interests.

Our Compensation Committee evaluates our compensation practices on an ongoing basis to determine whether they are appropriate to attract, retain and reward outstanding performers. Our compensation practices also are tailored to account for the specific needs and responsibilities of the particular position as well as the performance and unique qualifications of the individual employee, rather than by seniority or Netflix’s overall performance. We believe this helps us attract and retain the most talented employees from around the globe to drive innovation, creativity, growth and long-term value for our stockholders. The proposal would interfere with this carefully designed compensation program, which we believe is not only effective but integral to our success.

In 2020, we conducted a pay equity analysis and adopted practices to ensure that employees from underrepresented groups are not being underpaid relative to others doing the same or similar work. We also practice “open compensation,” which means the top leaders (director-level and above) at the Company can see how much any employee is paid. This encourages open discussions about pay disparities. We aim to rectify any pay gaps that we find through these approaches.

In summary, our compensation program and philosophy are thoughtfully designed and already consider a number of factors in setting compensation. The vague proposal to include the CEO pay-ratio and “other factors” in our compensation philosophy is unnecessary and would interfere with the ability of the Compensation Committee to optimally design our compensation program in a manner that it believes is in the best interest of the Company and our stockholders.

For the foregoing reasons, the Board unanimously believes that this proposal is not in the best interests of Netflix or our stockholders, and recommends that you vote “AGAINST” Proposal Six.

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of the majority of the Votes Cast is required to approve the stockholder proposal. The proposal is precatory and accordingly, is not binding on the Board or the Company.

Netflix Recommendation

LOGO

The Board unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote “AGAINST” Proposal Six.

LOGO

74        LOGO     


LOGO

OTHER INFORMATION                     


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information known to us with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 8, 2021 by (i) each stockholder that we know is the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock, (ii) each director and nominee for director, (iii) each Named Executive Officer, and (iv) all executive officers and directors as a group. We have relied upon information provided to us by our directors and Named Executive Officers and copies of documents sent to us that have been filed with the SEC by others for purposes of determining the number of shares each person beneficially owns. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and generally includes those persons who have voting or investment power with respect to the securities. Except as otherwise indicated, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock beneficially owned by them. Shares of our common stock subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 8, 2021 are also deemed outstanding for purposes of calculating the percentage ownership of that person, and if applicable, the percentage ownership of the executive officers and directors as a group, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each stockholder listed in the table below is c/o Netflix, Inc., 100 Winchester Circle, Los Gatos, CA 95032.

Name and Address

Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
Percent of
Class

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(1)

100 Vanguard Blvd

Malvern, PA 19355

 33,200,737 7.49%

Capital Research Global Investors(2)

333 South Hope Street

Los Angeles, CA 90071

 30,232,937 6.82%

BlackRock, Inc.(3)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

 28,731,448 6.48%

Reed Hastings(4)

 7,998,031 1.79%

Jay C. Hoag(5)

250 Middlefield Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

 2,624,183 *

Ted Sarandos(6)

 563,134 *

Greg Peters(7)

 286,036 *

David Hyman(8)

 221,563 *

Spencer Neumann(9)

 73,474 *

Richard N. Barton(10)

 49,134 *

Leslie Kilgore(11)

 46,901 *

Timothy M. Haley(12)

c/o Redpoint Ventures

2969 Woodside Road

Woodside, CA 94062

 37,826 *

Bradford L. Smith(13)

 30,371 *

Ann Mather(14)

 16,866 *

Anne M. Sweeney(15)

 8,705 *

Rachel Whetstone(16)

 6,227 *

Mathias Döpfner(17)

 5,143 *

Rodolphe Belmer(18)

 4,543 *

Strive Masiyiwa(19)

 464 *

All directors and executive officers as a group (18 persons)(20)

 11,989,268 2.68%

LOGO

$335,791 (1)
76     335,791 (2)

A. George (Skip) Battle

    LOGO
     335,791 (1)335,791 (3)

Timothy M. Haley

335,791 (1)335,791(4)

Jay C. Hoag

335,791(1)335,791(5)

Leslie Kilgore

335,791(1)335,791(6)

Ann Mather

335,791 (1)335,791(7)

Bradford L. Smith

335,791(1)335,791(8)

Anne M. Sweeney

335,791(1)335,791(9)

Grant Date  Fair Value 

1/3/2017

  $28,471 

2/1/2017

   28,488 

3/1/2017

   28,476 

4/3/2017

   27,168 

5/1/2017

   27,108 

6/1/2017

   27,097 

7/3/2017

   27,471 

8/1/2017

   27,416 

9/1/2017

   27,469 

10/2/2017

   28,876 

11/1/2017

   28,915 

12/1/2017

   28,836 

(1)Option awards reflect the monthly grant of stock options to eachnon-employee director on the dates and at the aggregate grant date fair values, as shown below.
(2)Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Barton at December 31, 2017 was 64,781.
(3)Aggregate number of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Battle at December 31, 2017 was 112,007.

66


(4)*Aggregate number

Less than 1% of option awardsthe Company’s outstanding held by Mr. Haley at December 31, 2017 was 64,702.shares of common stock.

(5)1.Aggregate number

As of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Hoag at December 31, 2017 was 57,863.2020, based on information provided by The Vanguard Group, Inc. in the Schedule 13G/A filed February 10, 2021. Of the shares beneficially owned, The Vanguard Group, Inc. reported that it has sole dispositive power with respect to 31,246,463 shares, shared dispositive power with respect to 1,954,274 shares, shared voting power with respect to 758,570 shares, and sole voting power with respect to zero shares.

(6)2.Aggregate number

As of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Kilgore at December 31, 2017 was 23,115.2020, based on information provided by Capital Research Global Investors in the Schedule 13G/A filed February 16, 2021. Of the shares beneficially owned, Capital Research Global Investors reported that it has sole dispositive power with respect to all the shares and sole voting power with respect to 30,224,074 shares.

(7)3.Aggregate number

As of option awards outstanding held by Ms. Mather at December 31, 2017 was 35,750.2020, based on information provided by BlackRock, Inc. in the Schedule 13G/A filed January 29, 2021. Of the shares beneficially owned, BlackRock, Inc. reported that it has sole dispositive power with respect to all of the shares and sole voting power with respect to 24,895,490 shares.

(8)4.Aggregate number

Includes options to purchase 3,075,639 shares. Mr. Hastings is a trustee of option awards outstanding held by Mr. Smith at December 31, 2017 was 16,882.the Hastings-Quillin Family Trust, which is the holder of 4,922,392 of the Company’s shares.

(9)5.Aggregate number of option awards outstanding

Includes (i) 703,825 common shares that are directly held by Ms. Sweeney at December 31, 2017 was 16,882.TCV VII, L.P. (“TCV VII”), (ii) 365,509 common shares that are directly held by TCV VII (A), L.P. (“TCV VII (A)”), (iii) 6,086 common shares that are directly held by TCV Member Fund, L.P. (“Member Fund”), (iv) 640,434 common shares that are directly held by Orange Investor, L.P. (“Orange Investor”), (v) 172,704 common shares that are directly held by Orange Investor (A), L.P. (“Orange Investor (A)”), (vi) 39,777 common shares that are directly held by Orange Investor (B), L.P. (“Orange Investor (B)”), (vii) 47,085 common shares that are directly held by Orange (MF) Investor, L.P. (“Orange Investor (MF)”), (viii) options to purchase 31,049 common shares held by Jay C. Hoag, (ix) 479,398 common shares held by the Hoag Family Trust U/A Dtd 8/2/94 (the “Hoag Family Trust”), and (x) 138,316 common shares held by Hamilton Investments Limited Partnership (“Hamilton Investments”).

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Jay C. Hoag and six other individuals (the “Class A Directors of Management VII”) are Class A Directors of Technology Crossover Management VII, Ltd. (“Management VII”) and limited partners of Technology Crossover Management VII, L.P. (“TCM VII”) and Member Fund. Management VII is the general partner of TCM VII, which is the general partner of TCV VII and TCV VII (A). Management VII is also a general partner of Member Fund. The Class A Directors of Management VII and TCM VII may be deemed to beneficially own the shares held by TCV VII, TCV VII (A) and Member Fund, but each disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of their pecuniary interest therein.

Mr. Hoag and five other individuals (the “Class A Directors of Management VIII”) are Class A Directors of Technology Crossover Management VIII, Ltd. (“Management VIII”) and limited partners of Technology Crossover Management VIII, L.P. (“TCM VIII”). Management VIII is the sole general partner of TCM VIII, which in turn is the sole general partner of TCV VIII, L.P., which in turn is the sole member of Orange Investor GP, LLC (“Orange GP”), which in turn is the sole general partner of Orange Investor, Orange (A) Investor, Orange (B) Investor, and Orange (MF) Investor. The Class A Directors of Management VIII and TCM VIII may be deemed to beneficially own the shares held by Orange Investor, Orange (A) Investor, Orange (B) Investor, and Orange (MF) Investor but each disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of their pecuniary interest therein. The shares held by Orange Investor, Orange (A) Investor, Orange (B) Investor, and Orange (MF) Investor are also pledged as collateral for a third party debt facility.

Mr. Hoag has the sole power to dispose and direct the disposition of the options and any shares issuable upon exercise of the options, and the sole power to direct the vote of the shares of common stock to be received upon exercise of the options. However, with respect to the options, Mr. Hoag has transferred to TCV VII Management, L.L.C. (“TCV VII Management”) and TCV VIII Management, L.L.C. (“TCV VIII Management”) 100% of the pecuniary interest in such options and any shares to be issued upon exercise of such options. Mr. Hoag is a member of TCV VII Management and TCV VIII Management but disclaims beneficial ownership of such options and any shares to be received upon exercise of such options except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

Mr. Hoag is a trustee of the Hoag Family Trust and may be deemed to have the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of the shares held by the Hoag Family Trust. Mr. Hoag disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

Mr. Hoag is the sole general partner and a limited partner of Hamilton Investments and may be deemed to have the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of the shares held by Hamilton Investments. Mr. Hoag disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

6.

Includes options to purchase 563,134 shares.

7.

Includes options to purchase 272,946 shares.

8.

Includes options to purchase 189,953 shares.

9.

Includes options to purchase 73,474 shares.

10.

Includes options to purchase 31,876 shares. Mr. Barton is a trustee of the Barton Family Foundation, which is the holder of 10,000 of the Company’s shares.

11.

Includes options to purchase 11,705 shares.

12.

Includes options to purchase 37,826 shares.

13.

Includes options to purchase 23,872 shares.

14.

Includes options to purchase 16,866 shares.

15.

Includes options to purchase 8,705 shares.

16.

Includes options to purchase 5,912 shares.

17.

Includes options to purchase 5,118 shares.

18.

Includes options to purchase 4,543 shares.

19.

Includes options to purchase 464 shares.

20.

Includes, without duplication, the shares and options listed in footnotes (4) through (19) above.

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our ordinary shares to file reports of their beneficial ownership and changes in ownership (Forms 3, 4 and 5, and any amendment thereto) with the SEC.

Based solely on a review of forms filed in the SEC’s EDGAR database and written representations from executive officers and directors, we believe that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, all filing requirements were satisfied on a timely basis, except that, due to an administrative error: (A) a late Form 4 was filed for each of Richard Barton, Rodolphe Belmer, Mathias Döpfner, Timothy Haley, Reed Hastings, David Hyman, Leslie Kilgore, Ann Mather, Jessica Neal, Spencer Neumann, Greg Peters, Susan Rice, Ted Sarandos, Brad Smith, Anne Sweeney and Rachel Whetstone on September 4, 2020, with respect to stock options granted on September 1, 2020 and (B) a late Form 4 was filed for Mr. Barton on September 4, 2020 with respect to transactions that occurred September 1, 2020.

 

LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT    77


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table summarizes the Company’sour equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2017.2020. There were no equity compensation plans or arrangements not approved by security holders.

 

  Number of Securities to
be Issued

Upon Exercise of
Outstanding

Options, Warrants and
Rights
  Weighted-
Average Exercise
Price of Outstanding
Options,

Warrants and Rights
  Number of Securities Remaining
Available for Future Issuance
Under Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
 

Plan category

 (a)  (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation plans or arrangements approved by security holders  21,647,350 (1)  $61.13   30,239,962 (2) 

Plan Category

Number of
Securities to
be Issued
Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants,
and Rights

(a)

Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants,
and Rights

(b)

Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future
Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans
(Excluding
Securities
Reflected in
Column (a))

(c)

Equity compensation plans or arrangements approved by security holders:

2002 Plan(1)

 416,418 21.26 

2011 Plan(2)

 17,446,523 158.02 

2020 Plan

 813,869 508.30 21,702,085

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

   

Total

 18,676,810(3)  170.23 21,702,085

(1)(1)

Our Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Plan (the “2002 Plan”) terminated in 2012, and no new awards may be issued thereunder. The outstanding options under the 2002 Plan are described in this row.

(2)

No new awards may be issued under the Netflix, Inc. 2011 Stock Plan (the “2011 Plan”) after June 4, 2020. The outstanding options under the 2011 Plan are described in this row.

(3)

Weighted average life is 5.975.55 years.

(2)Includes (i) 19,500,047 shares of the Company’s common stock reserved under its 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), as amended, for future issuance, and (ii) 10,739,915 shares of the Company’s common stock reserved under its 2011 Stock Plan. In 2010, the Company suspended payroll contributions to the ESPP and ended purchases of shares by employees. The Company currently does not expect to resume ESPP contributions or purchases for the foreseeable future.

Compensation Risk

The Company’s compensation policies fornon-executive salaried employees are the same as those outlined for its Named Executive Officers, except that only the Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the Performance Bonus Plan. Given the design of our compensation structure, as detailed in the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we do not believe that our compensation policies and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

67


Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for its directors, officers and other employees. A copy of the Code of Ethics is available on the Company’s Investor Relations website athttp://ir.netflix.com/governance.cfm. Any waivers of the Code of Ethics will be posted at that website.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of the Company’s common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the SEC rules to furnish the Company with copies of all Forms 3, 4 and 5 they file.

To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, during fiscal year 2017 all of the Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to the Company’s officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders were followed in a timely manner.

68


REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Audit Committee engages and supervises the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. Management has the primary responsibility for the preparation of financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in the Company’s annual report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 with management, including a discussion of the quality of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments made by management and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Audit Committee reviewed with Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, who is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, its judgments as to the quality of the Company’s accounting principles and the other matters required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, including the matters required by Auditing Standard No. 1301,Communications with Audit Committees, issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with EY its independence from management and the Company, including the written disclosures and the letter regarding its independence as required by PCAOB Rule 3526,Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence.

The Audit Committee also reviewed the fees paid to EY during the year ended December 31, 2017 for audit andnon-audit services, which fees are described under the heading “Principal Accountant Fees and Services.” The Audit Committee has determined that the rendering of allnon-audit services by EY were compatible with maintaining its independence.

The Audit Committee discussed with EY the overall scope and plans for its audit. The Audit Committee met with EY, with and without management present, to discuss the results of its examinations, its evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the annual report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

Richard N. Barton

Leslie Kilgore

Ann Mather

69


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Agreements with Directors and Executive Officers

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its directors and executive officers. These agreements require the Company to indemnify such individuals, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, for certain liabilities to which they may become subject as a result of their affiliation with the Company.

Procedures for Approval of Related Party Transactions

The Company has a written policy concerning the review and approval of related party transactions. Potential related party transactions are identified through an internal review process that includes a review of payments made in connection with transactions in which related persons may have had a direct or indirect material interest. Those transactions that are determined to be related party transactions under Item 404 of RegulationS-K issued by the SEC are submitted for review by the Audit Committee for approval and to conduct aconflicts-of-interest analysis. The individual identified as the “related party” may not participate in any review or analysis of the related party transaction.

Mr. Hastings beneficially owns two aircraft which are leased to Netflix by him under time-sharing agreements for Netflix business related travel by Mr. Hastings and other Netflix employees. Under the terms of the time-sharing agreements, Netflix provides payment to Mr. Hastings for such travel based on the aggregate incremental cost of each specific flight pursuant to applicable FAA regulations. In 2017, Netflix reimbursed Mr. Hastings $759,164 under these time-sharing agreements.

70


STOCKHOLDERS SHARING AN ADDRESS

Stockholders sharing an address with another stockholder may receive only one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials at that address unless they have provided contrary instructions. Any such stockholder who wishes to receive a separate Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials now or in the future may write or call Broadridge to request a separate copy from:

Householding Department

Broadridge

51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717

(800) 542-10611-866-540-7095

Broadridge will promptly, upon written or oral request, deliver a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or if requested, a separate copy of its annual report or this Proxy Statement to any stockholder at a shared address to which only a single copy was delivered.

Similarly, stockholders sharing an address with another stockholder who have received multiple copies of the Company’s Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials may write or call the above address and phone number to request delivery of a single copy in the future.

LOGO

78        LOGO


OTHER MATTERS

The Board knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the accompanying proxy intend to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment.

By order of the Board of Directors

 

LOGOLOGO

David Hyman

General CounselChief Legal Officer and Secretary

April 23, 20182021

Los Gatos, California

 

71LOGO

2021 PROXY STATEMENT    79


LOGO


LOGO


 

NETFLIX, INC.

100 WINCHESTER CIRCLE

LOS GATOS, CA 95032

 

VOTE BY INTERNET

BeforeTheMeeting- Go towww.proxyvote.com

 

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 8:59 p.m. Pacific Time on June 5, 2018.2, 2021. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

 

During The MeetingDuringTheMeeting- Go tonflx.onlineshareholdermeeting.comwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/nflx2021

 

You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.

 

VOTE BY PHONE -1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 8:59 p.m. Pacific Time on June 5, 2018.2, 2021. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

 

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

 

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

E46841-P06577D39612-P51438                 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

— — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — ��� — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — —

    DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 

 

NETFLIX, INC.

            
 
 

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals:

 

       
 

1.  To elect four Class I directors to hold office until the 20212024
Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

   

         
 

       Nominees:

  For       Withhold          
 

1a. Richard N. Barton

        

The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST the following proposals:

   For    Against    Abstain  
 

1b. Rodolphe Belmer

        4.  

Stockholder proposal to allow holders of an aggregate of 15% of outstanding common stock to call special shareholder meeting,entitled, “Proposal 4 – Political Disclosures,” if properly presented at the meeting.

 

            
 

1c. Bradford L. Smith

        5.  

Stockholder proposal regarding proxy access bylaw for director nominees by stockholders,entitled, “Proposal 5 – Simple Majority Vote,” if properly presented at the meeting.

 

            
 

1d. Anne M. Sweeney

        6.  

Stockholder proposal regarding clawback policy,entitled, “Stockholder Proposal to Improve the Executive Compensation Philosophy,” if properly presented at the meeting.

 

            
   For    Against    Abstain7.

Stockholder proposal regarding shareholder right to act by written consent, if properly presented at the meeting.

    
 

2.  To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018.2021.

          8.  Stockholder proposal regarding simple majority vote, if properly presented at the meeting.      
 

3.  Advisory approval of the Company’s executive officer compensation.

          9.  Stockholder proposal to amend Sections 2.8 and 3.3 of the bylaws to provide for the election of directors in uncontested elections by a majority vote of shares voted, if properly presented at the meeting.      
Mark box at right if an address change or comment has been noted on this card.
            
 This proxy should be marked, dated and signed by the stockholder or stockholders exactly as the stockholder’s or stockholders’ names appearname(s) appear(s) hereon, and returned promptly in the enclosed envelope. Persons signing in a fiduciary or representative capacity should so indicate. If shares are held by joint tenants, as community property or otherwise by more than one person, all should sign.

         
             
                            
                            
 Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]  Date    Signature (Joint Owners)   Date     
             


 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.

 

 

— — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — —

— — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — —

E46842-P06577D39613-P51438

 

 

FORM OF PROXY

NETFLIX, INC.

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

JUNE 6, 20183, 2021

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned stockholder of Netflix, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement, each dated April 23, 2018,2021, and hereby appoints Reed HastingsDavid Hyman and David Wells,Spencer Neumann, and each of them, with full power of substitution, as proxy or proxies to vote all shares of the Company’s common stock of the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Netflix, Inc. to be held on June 6, 2018,3, 2021, and at any adjournments thereof, upon the proposals set forth in this proxy and described in the Proxy Statement, and in their discretion with respect to such other matters as may be properly brought before the meeting or any adjournments thereof.

If this proxy is properly executed and returned, this proxy will be voted for the specifications made on the reverse side or if no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR the nominees for Class I directors set forth on the reverse side (item 1), FOR items 2 and 3, and AGAINST items 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9,6, and in the discretion of the proxies on all other matters as may be properly brought before the meeting or any adjournments thereof.

Either of such proxies or substitutes shall have and may exercise all of the powers of said proxies hereunder.

 

Address Changes/Comments:

 

(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

Continued and to be signed on reverse side